• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact AKM sama if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.

Content Revision Promotion Thread

RoTt35

RoTt35

3,883
3,703
RoTt35 said:
Game of Thrones: Wights rework, WW additions and Dragons upgrade
Priority: 1 (Stats (Abilities, AP, speed, dura) upgrades and additions for almost every character of the verse)
Verse: Game of Thrones
Description: The CRT proposes to upgrade several stats (Tier, abilities, speed) of the dragons, considerably upgrade the AP and range with magic of the Night King, upgrade the equipment (weapons and armor) of all the characters to 9-B, add new abilities to certain characters, etc.
Click to expand...
Bumping this since the CRT evolved into something much more extensive and important that affects and upgrades almost all the characters of the verse
 
Gewsbumpz_dude

Gewsbumpz_dude

Username Only
3,393
742
Priority: 2

Verse: Goosebumps

Description: Big-ish Goosebumps CRT that adds;
1. New key for Slappy, said key being for a giant transformation with a 9-A feat. His last key might scale to it.
2. Add a new feat to Slappy's profile that comes with an accepted calc, to add onto the list of 9-C feats for the dude.
3. Slappy scaling to mummies since he scales to Mr. Wood, who scales to the strongest/"daddy" of all mummies. This one isn't really important, just their for tier consistency.
4. Update the statistics of four profiles that are affiliated with Slappy, to match his current stats.

Note: The verse is dead and I'm pretty much the only full-on supporter. So help from anyone will be appreciated.
 
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara

Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara

She/Her
6,433
6,340
Fireld

Fireld

2,014
2,987
Priority: 2

Verse: Sonic the Hedgehog(Games)

Description: Sonic Black-Blue CTR

Mostly additional proof to powers/stats already in the pages, a few powers suggested to be added/removed and a new key for Classic Sonic.
 
FantaRin_The_First

FantaRin_The_First

Username Only
3,363
1,803
Makai641001

Makai641001

He/Him
3,763
3,292
Priority 4

Verse: Four Knights of The Apocalypse/NNT (Here)

Description: Lots of hax abilities for multiple characters most have already been accepted but we need quick inputs asap (we don’t want it to slow down since other threads are coming)
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Majinere566

Majinere566

4,128
3,714
Makai said:
Priority 4

Verse: Four Knights of The Apocalypse/NNT

Description: Lots of hax abilities for multiple characters most have already been accepted but we need quick inputs asap (we don’t want it to slow down since other threads are coming)
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
No link?
 
Makai641001

Makai641001

He/Him
3,763
3,292
Priority: 1

Verse: NNT/FKOTA

Description: We need some input Here
the Sandbox contains some hax from Here too since we forgot to add them Mitch And ByAsura already agreed to my thread but since the Sandbox is in an other thread we need new inputs
 
GoldenScorpions

GoldenScorpions

He/Him
2,853
1,073
Priority: 1 (Affects the entire verse and the unique physiology of its characters)
Verse: Shakugan no Shana
Description: Reviewing and validating abilities to apply them to the characters of the entire verse (including Conceptual and Causality Manipulation, Existence Erasure, and Non-Existent Physiology)
Note: The objective is to evaluate if scans, justifications and wording of the abilities make sense, and if the abilities are valid to be used
 
Ikhvagracia

Ikhvagracia

He/Him
82
38
following
Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...
following
 
Ikhvagracia

Ikhvagracia

He/Him
82
38
Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...

Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...

Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...
Priority: 2
Verse: Strike The Blood
Description: Attack Potency Upgrade
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Shmooply
  • Locked
Why don't Content Moderators hold the same voting power?
Replies
26
Views
726
Deagonx
Deagonx
ImmortalDread
  • Locked
Adding 48 hours grace to rejected CRTs
Replies
17
Views
818
Crabwhale
Crabwhale
AKM sama
A Super Moderator Promotion
Replies
66
Views
2K
Agnaa
Agnaa
ImmortalDread
  • Locked
Staff Discussion rules
2
Replies
109
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Flashlight237
  • Locked
CRTs Done Easier
2
Replies
107
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima

Connect with us

VS Battles Wiki Forum

The main purpose of this forum is to discuss how to properly index the statistics of characters from a wide variety of different fictional franchises.

What's new

Forum statistics

Threads
146,560
Messages
5,642,527
Members
13,752
Latest member
Zamzadam

Share this page

Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
  • Width
  • Queries
    12
  • Time
    0.4671s
  • Memory
    8.95MB
Top