This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact AKM sama if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need your help!
We need Patreon donations of at least 250 Euros per month for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive "Supporter", "Super Supporter", or "Ultra Supporter" badges that remove all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
which in these feats distances should be used for calculations?
There are staff who say using the upper one for better accuracy, while others say using the lower one for low-balling results.
In my opinion, the second panel gets farther away due to the impact or some kind of vibration when firing the gun, so it's a little further apart.
What do you think?
Would you explain to this user about Omega Zero/ Zero´s body soul resistance? He is bringing that Biometals should have souls and I think that Zero´s body lacks one for being more akin to a Reploid, I saw you as a supporter of the Megaman franchise and if you want to help to clarify this, I would be grateful
Hello, sorry to bother but could you give a look to thistwo calcs? The first was done with the help of KLOL506 so in principle should be correct, is about a character throwing a tank, the second was me trying to use how KLOL506 showed me to calc the force and ke to calculate the charge of something compared with a triceratops.
I was told to get the opinion of another calc group member for this explosion calc.
To summarize-
In the calc, as the origin/center of the explosion is on/in the ground, and width-wise it goes way off panel, I'm using the distance the explosion reaches above the ground as the radius, although I'm told that I should use the width of the explosion that's within the panel, even though the explosion visibly reaches farther than that.
So I asked the opinion of another calc group member, who said "For explosions, you're generally supposed to use the width of the explosion and not the height, yes. But if you can prove that the explosion's effects reach a horizontal distance of comparable magnitude to the vertical, then it should be fine."
When I showed the rest of the scene and asked if it was enough proof that the explosion's horizontal size is similar in magnitude to it's vertical, they said "Not really sure myself TBH. I guess you could ask more calc members?", and so now I am. Your input would be appreciated
Howdy, sorry to bother! I've had this feat (Untitled Goose Game; The Goose destroys a stone tower; 0:04) submitted in the Calc Request thread for over a year, have bumped it about three times, but to no avail. Would you be able to check it out, and perhaps calc it?
And while I'm here, I was also hoping to see if it would be possible to calc Kris jumping halfway across their bathroom (2:57) lol, might get them a little bit higher to 10-B.
Hello, I hope you are having a nice day. There's something I want to ask you about black hole success. It's a black hole-like technique, and that's the statement in the data book. The super-gravity force swallows all creation!! This is exactly how it is mentioned, and in its own series it absorbs space, ninjutsu, earth and air, and is very similar in appearance to a real black hole.
Hey man, i'd just like to thank you for your work and for your help with calc evaluation and such. Just wanted to let you know that i appreciate it a lot.
just to let you know regarding the stickmin revision thread i made
i made sure to put the correct one in the article. cause the second example. i ended up putting the joy buzzer scene not the hack the door scene. (in the article it's the correct one)
Technically, these blogs have been partially evaluated, but I would like several other CGM opinions as I've given my arguments as to why I think several of the calculations that were rejected are actually viable. I think I give good points, and would like to see if the CGM would actually consider the ones that were seemingly rejected by another CGM that I don't want to pester too much.