• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Content Revision Promotion Thread

Priority 4

Verse: Four Knights of The Apocalypse/NNT (Here)

Description: Lots of hax abilities for multiple characters most have already been accepted but we need quick inputs asap (we don’t want it to slow down since other threads are coming)
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Makai said:
Priority 4

Verse: Four Knights of The Apocalypse/NNT

Description: Lots of hax abilities for multiple characters most have already been accepted but we need quick inputs asap (we don’t want it to slow down since other threads are coming)
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
No link?
 
Priority: 1

Verse: NNT/FKOTA

Description: We need some input Here
the Sandbox contains some hax from Here too since we forgot to add them Mitch And ByAsura already agreed to my thread but since the Sandbox is in an other thread we need new inputs
 
Priority: 1 (Affects the entire verse and the unique physiology of its characters)
Verse: Shakugan no Shana
Description: Reviewing and validating abilities to apply them to the characters of the entire verse (including Conceptual and Causality Manipulation, Existence Erasure, and Non-Existent Physiology)
Note: The objective is to evaluate if scans, justifications and wording of the abilities make sense, and if the abilities are valid to be used
 
following
Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...
following
 
Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...

Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...

Antvasima said:
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


Click to expand...
Priority: 2
Verse: Strike The Blood
Description: Attack Potency Upgrade
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Wokistan
Distortion Detective cleanup
Replies
23
Views
1K
MysticBrawler
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
32 33 34
Replies
1K
Views
99K
Elizhaa
Elizhaa
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Planck69
  • Locked
Touhou Thread Rule Removal
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Planck69
Planck69
Back
Top