Yeah, idk our site's standards on them, idk how to argue them, but if they accept stuff like this they're flawed imo, yet I don't have the interest in revising them.People doing stuff in fictional timeless voids happen all the time. Otherwise, any depiction of a timeless void in fiction would be people standing still.
That's not the only way to do things, they could concretely establish the characters as having infinite speed, relevant plot devices can be non-spatio-temporal, an order of causality can be established without time. But still, it's all either really high-effort and constraining, or it's flawed in some way.
Overpowered bullshit that's still interesting to readers is difficult to write in a non-contradictory way, that's why most fiction's weak. The solution to that isn't letting every piece of fiction that tries in. That's why so few verses are tier 0 despite trying to portray omnipotence.