• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
17,454

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I will like to comment on this thread, if you do not mind.
    Can I get permission to make a post here?

    • Like
    Reactions: LuffyRuffy46307
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    To avoid clutter I would ask that if you're both on the same side of the debate to work together to make a singular large comment, rather than two separate comments that would cover the same idea.

    But yeah you two can make (up to) three comments if you feel like you can add to the debate..
    BasedNecoScaler69
    BasedNecoScaler69
    My bad, didnt see the fact it was a staff discussion, i got linked to it over discord and it just went straight to the post.
    Can i recieve permission to comment? Also, restore my earlier comment with the images.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    If I restore your post it will count as one of your three comments.

    But sure. Though like with the other two I would suggest to take your time with posting.
    Howdy, I'm Lemon, Lemon the Lemon and... wrong verse, any way feel free to ignore this mensage but there is a verse on the wiki full of bad profiles and me and the other supporters of the verse made a radical decision that need aproval and action of staff to happen, would You do this for this verse who always come back? Yes, It's FNAF
    Hey Qawsed, my thread is lacking staff input...
    Hey, could you please check out this thread?
    I know you probably aren't a supporter but at the same time I'd like your honest opinion
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I can't give permanent participation approval rules wise:
    • Only staff members with evaluation rights can authorize regular members to participate in Staff Discussion threads. Thread Moderators are able to grant permission for a single post at a time, whereas administrators can give permission for up to three. Bureaucrats are the only staff members that are allowed to give indefinite posting rights for a particular staff thread. If a staff member with evaluation rights determines that a regular member has misused their granted privileges, these can be removed.
    But if you want to make (up to) three comments go ahead I guess.
    🙏
    Quick question: can a CRT be accepted from 3 staff agrees, 1 neutral, and 1 disagree?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    If it comes to an impass it can. Though the three staff agreements probably should be reissued after whatever debate happened is finished.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    What's your comment?
    TheShape03
    TheShape03
    I'll just leave a comment with the scans/arguments I have on the subject of Space Beyond and the Timestream (summarized), then I'll leave the rest in the hands of the staff because I heard the standards for Low 1-C are different now. No need for me to comment on the thread, I could send the summarized arguments to you here, then if you think that qualifies for Low 1-C then you could comment on it yourself on the thread.

    The commentary is basically evidence that there are infinite universes in Space Beyond, and evidence that universes are infinite in size with infinite dimensions. Space Beyond is larger than those infinite 2-A structures, and within the Timestream, Space Beyond and everything else as something infinitesimal.

    I'm not sure if that currently means any of those structures are Low 1-C but I think it's worth a try.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I think you should be good to comment then.
    859680447395135498.gif

    Sry to disturb , but would u mind checking my crt , plz 🙏
    Could you restore my comment, if you checked the very top of the message you would see i'm already authorized to post inside that thread.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    You have permission, but based on mod's comment it was deleted because you responded to stuff Ultima already responded to.

    I can restore it if you want, but that's why it was deleted in the first place.
    BasedNecoScaler69
    BasedNecoScaler69
    Ah, it seems like I got ninjad by ultima while writing it.
    If you feel like its relevant enough, you can restore it
    Hello. Could you help give input in this CRT please?
    Hello. Could you help give input in this CRT please?
    Could you take a look?

    Oh look, a series nobody knows! Can you please comment?
    Hello dear mod. If you have a single minute or two to spare, I need your rough stance on something regarding the tiering system standards that's been subject to controversy recently.
    So there's been a lot of discussion regarding the standards for higher additional/higher dimensions. Through these two statements from DDT and Ultima, it was established that overarching timelines aren't automatically Low 1-C because spatiotemporal separation doesn't inherently introduce new axes/dimensions of time, and a single time dimension can service a construction of a timeline encompassing a multiverse. With all the debate over technicalities of when overarching timelines could qualify for Low 1-C, I have to summarize my concerns into a simple yes/no question.
    Are overarching timelines Low 1-C when there is confirmation for the lesser timelines it encompasses harboring their own time dimensions/axes?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Timelines are only Low 1-C if you can prove that there's an Aleph-1/Power Set of Aleph-0 number of them as detailed on the FAQ page

    Q: How do cardinal numbers relate to tiering?​

    A: Firstly, it should be highlighted that asking about the tier of a cardinal number is effectively a meaningless question when the quantity which it is denoting is not specified in the question as well, and makes as much sense as asking "What tier is the number 8?"

    Let's take the smallest infinite cardinal (aleph-0, or ℵ0, the cardinality of countably infinite sets) as an example in this case: A set comprised of a countably infinite number of 0-dimensional points is itself a 0-dimensional space under the usual notions of dimensionality, being thus still infinitely small. Meanwhile, a countably infinite number of planets is High 3-A, a countably infinite number of universes 2-A, and countably infinite dimensions High 1-B.

    We then move on to the power set of ℵ0, P(ℵ0), which is an uncountably infinite quantity and represents the set of all the ways in which you can arrange the elements of a set whose cardinality is the former, and is also equal to the size of the set of all real numbers. In terms of points, one can say that everything from 1-dimensional space to (countably) infinite-dimensional space falls under it, as all of these spaces have the same number of elements (coordinates, in this case), in spite of each being infinitely larger than the preceding one by the intuitive notions of size that we regularly utilize (Area, Volume, etc)

    On the other hand, an P(ℵ0) number of universes is Low 1-C, and a similar number of spatial dimensions/layers of reality is Low 1-A

    However, the same does not necessarily apply when approaching sets of higher cardinalities than this (Such as P(P(ℵ0)), the power set of the power set of aleph-0), as they would be strictly bigger than all of the spaces mentioned above, by all rigorous notions of size, regardless of what their elements are. From this point and onwards, all such sets are Low 1-A at minimum.

    Do note, however, that these infinities must specifically refer to elements that physically exist within a verse's cosmology. Them existing as in-universe mathematical concepts is not sufficient for anything to scale to them, unless there is a direct comparision that allows scaling to be made.
    ProfectusInfinity
    ProfectusInfinity
    Thanks for responding. I’m not talking about a multiverse with uncountably infinitely many timelines, I’m talking about higher time dimensions.

    Q: How do temporal dimensions impact on tiering?
    A: The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinite points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

    This structure can then be generalized to any amounts of dimensions, and is also the reason destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). So, for example, a spacetime continuum comprising two temporal dimensions (Instead of just one) would have an additional time direction whose "snapshots" correspond to the whole of a 4-dimensional spacetime, and so on and so forth.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    The application is the same. To get Low 1-C you need to prove that the temporal dimensions (which are presumed to be 4-D) equate to a Power Set of an Aleph-0 or work on a higher dimensional standard.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top