• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
17,454

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hi, i found a feat in T2 book that i think upgrades plasma weapons in Terminator franchise, what do you think about it?

    In the future war between man and machine, SKYNET's endoskeleton forces wield deadly weapons designed to efficiently terminate human resistance fighters. One of the most effective is the 40-Watt Phased Plasma Rifle, which fires superheated hydrogen compresseed to a plasma state. A pilot laser in the weapon vaporizes a path through the atmosphere to the target a microsecond before the actual bolt is produced. The plasma bolt then follows the laser beam to the target at a velocity in excess of 8500 meters per second. The weapon is capable of a rate of fire superior to the common resistance weaponry, with minimal risk of overheating or weapon shutdown. Armor is easily penetrated by the super hot plasma bolt which can burn its way through more than a quarter-meter of case-hardened steel.Striking an organic target with the plasma bolt will almost certainly result in fatality, including the possibility of explosion or neatly cauterized amputation. A near miss can inflict third degree burns, and 'splash damage' can be as devastating as a traditional granade blast
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    What novel is it from? Because there's multiple T2 novels.
    Gasper
    Gasper
    I confused this quote with something else, the quote is actually from official medal box of the plasma weapon. Sorry about that.

    But in T3 novel on page 22 it says this about Skynet's processing power speed if you're interested:

    Skynet's AI was an absolute marvel of human-machine science and engineering. First stumbled upon by Cyberdyne's Miles Bennet Dyson the computer's main central processing units used Quantum Effects chips. Until then computers were powered by chips composed of millions of transistors. Computing the old way was done using the binary system—ones and zeroes, ons and offs. With the QE brain in which 10^54 computations could be made each second, quadrillions of switching positions were possible, many of them simultaneously at each quantum level. All of this happened down around the Planck length—theoretically the smallest measurement possible—so infinitesimally small that superstrings were the major league players; strange ten dimensional building blocks that were more than one thousand billion billion times smaller than a single proton in the nucleus of a hydrogen atom.
    Sorry bother you, can you give your input here?

    Can I have a moment of your time?
    Good night little brother!


    I don't want to ruin your night, but could you evaluate this?
    I'd like you to take a look at this upgrade please.
    Sorry for bothering you but could you give me your opinion in this thread i made please?

    XxZetsuxX
    XxZetsuxX
    Oh wait, I already sended one before, I forgot o.o
    You said that there is a difference in power between destroying a Low 1-C structure and infinite Low 1-C structures, right? Correct me if I'm wrong.

    If I'm right, I saw others on the staff saying that there is no difference in power between x character who destroyed one or infinite Low 1-C structures.

    Do you think a topic about this respect should be made to put something concrete into this?
    • Like
    Reactions: Huesito88
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    If I'm right, I saw others on the staff saying that there is no difference in power between x character who destroyed one or infinite Low 1-C structures.
    Well, they'd be wrong ad our own Tiering System says
    Characters or objects that are capable of significantly affecting,[1] creating, and/or destroying an area of space qualitatively larger than an infinitely-sized 3-dimensional space. Common fictional examples of spaces representing such sizes are space-time continuums (the entire past, present and future of 3-dimensional space) of a universal scale. However, it can be more generally fulfilled by any 4-dimensional space that is either:

    There's a difference tiering wise between a universal space and a infinite space. In addition a multiverse of a higher tier would be better than a baseline of that tier for the same reason 2-A is better than Low 2-C.
    Do you think a topic about this respect should be made to put something concrete into this?
    A topic doesn't do anything system wise. It's only purpose would be for like, VS debates I guess.
    Phsccarvalho
    Phsccarvalho
    I did a Q&A about this, could you go there and give your opinions?
    Sorry for distributing. Can I get your input here? It would be appreciated 🙏
    Are two universes (4D) parallel to each other and need a 5D space to contain them? And the reason why?
    Wikisource
    Wikisource
    So it will still be considered a 5th axis according to the standard even though it does not qualify for Low-1C ?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Yeah. Since the 5th dimensional axis has to be of a certain size to get Low 1-C. And a 2-A structure isn't enough for that.
    Wikisource
    Wikisource
    Last question, is it considered 5D even though it's not actually enough for Low 1-C? I just want to clarify whether it is really considered 5D or simply 4D but larger than usual.
    Sorry to bother you, but if you have time, can you look at this?
    You are wrong here: https://vsbattles.com/threads/why-not-sailor-moon-tier-one-the-last-time.160600/post-6171749

    King Endymion says: The spacetime key will allow you to find your way back to sailor pluto from any point in time and space.

    Key word, find your way back from. Meaning that if you use the key at any point in space and time, you will travel to pluto.

    Then Endymion says in the next line: "Say a prayer to the key and travel through time." He does not say travel through space and time.

    When you use the key you will travel through through time to pluto from any point in space and time.
    Iamunanimousinthat
    Iamunanimousinthat
    No that's wrong. They do not use the time key to leave the area or to travel through time. They only use it to take them to bring them to Sailor Pluto. Once they are in the corridor, it's Sailor Pluto who sends them through time.
    Iamunanimousinthat
    Iamunanimousinthat
    In the future, Sailor Moon uses the key and it brings her to Pluto.
    In the past, they use the key also and it brings them to Pluto as well.
    Another supporting fact is that when the key was used, it was directly called a time warp.

    As King Endymion says, they key brings them to Pluto via time travel no matter where they are in time or space. In both scenes, the characters say a prayer and the key takes them to Pluto.
    Iamunanimousinthat
    Iamunanimousinthat
    Hey! Just checking to see if you saw that I edited the last response. I added a scan that directly calls the usage of the time key as “initiating a time warp”.
    Hello! Can you please check this out!


    Can I make 1 post to ask a question in this thread?
    It's mostly regarding the time travel part and instances for branching timelines if branches become independent. but instead of time travel it's more on rewrite and erasure that somehow despite erasing the entirety including the past the other independent branch isn't affected in any way. I will be posting imagery to convey the questions as well
    When I said "They were talking about editing the profiles." I meant You were talking about editing the profiles (and them possibly getting reverted because of pending staff discussions being the reason why you disagreed on applying the upgrades right now).
    I wasn't trying to play 8D chess,I just wanted to inform the people there about what was happening in the staff thread but just worded it poorly.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Oh by the chess move comment I meant you wanted to respond to me about a staff thread without needing approval.

    I got what your intention was after reading some of the previous comments so no worries.
    Sorry for bothering you Can I get permission to comment on this crt


    thread has been made.
    Sorry to bother you, but if you have time, could you give section 5.1 of my blog a glance?
    Hi can you look at this pls

    sorry to bother you, but from this thread, i don't exactly know how to write the explanation for the blog, would you mind give me some ideas, references example, tbh, it is confusing, thank you very much, it is for DBH/XV anyway
    • Like
    Reactions: Khanhba01
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I'd include DT's quote
    Depends on context, but possibly yes. Although that hinges on the word time travel.

    Like, fundamentally you could say that you have one timeline that spans multiversal space. In the beginning, that space is empty. Then you rewrite the past so that 3 universes already existed in the space (which is the same as creating 3 timelines). So you rewrite the timeline of the multiversal space.
    Then you do the same again to add 5 more.

    Technically, you could say you only spawned several more multiverse spanning timelines. Like, now a empty multiverse spanning timeline, a multiverse spanning timeline with 3 universes and a multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes exist. The total number of timelines is only 11.
    If you are able to travel between multiverse spanning timelines, you would also be able to switch back from the multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes to the one without any universes/timelines.

    However, if you do that specifically via time travel, then that could be a good indicator that you are actually dealing with an additional time dimension. Because that indicates that the progression of the creation of timelines is done within a (presumably continuous) flow of time and that time wouldn't be that of the regular past where those universes always existed.
    And the the FAQ page

    Q: How do temporal dimensions impact on tiering?​

    A: The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinite points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

    This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two temporal dimensions (instead of just one) comprises a higher temporal axis that spans regular temporal dimensions that the entirety of 4-dimensional spacetimes, or equivalents to it are serviced by (This is similar to how the time dimension in a 4-dimensional spacetime continuum spans uncountably infinite 3-dimensional snapshots of the universe), qualifying it for Low 1-C. Unless fiction shows otherwise, a different multiversal temporal dimension spanning universes that themselves have their own time dimensions as well (not the same multiversal time dimension that services many Universes and is shared by them), or even a single universe with two active temporal dimensions, qualifies. The same applies to three or more temporal dimensions.
    Then since you know the verse better than I do, just give the following justifications:
    • The timelines are separate from one another. In other words its not a branching timeline but a bunch of separate timelines
    • When time travelling you make your own specific timeline rather than branching out a previous timeline
    • Showcase that if one timeline is erased another timeline is unaffected
    Then with the above say "Since Dragon Ball fulfills the above standards, each overarching timeline should be considered to have a different temporal dimension. Which would fit the criteria for a Low 1-C Hyper Timeline" or something like that.
    Hi Qawsedf, you've been actively involved in this thread.

    A different thread has now been opened for Ben10 and one of its foundations is still the same, 5-D space beyond.

    But there weren't enough votes, so I'm going to ask you to open this up again , because Space Beyond's downgrade from 5-D will also affect the new upgrade thread
    Hello, good morning from Brazil!
    Don't know who else to call, can you take a look on this thread? The discussion became very circular
    Hello

    Cab you check this thread, please?

    Uh, can u give your input on this thread?
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top