Can you review this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reading the OP, means reading all the proposed evidence, I know that there are many staffs who simply agree sometimes just skim reading, but I am not one of them as I take my evaluation role very seriously and it shows in the amount of people daily asking for my evaluation. It is not an evasive answer as for me, my answer was very concrete, and I myself clarified having read the blog in this thread, same information + scans. I hope this clarifies that I did read everything that was proposed.This was after having been repeatedly questioned on whether you had read the blog, giving an evasive answer each time. Being directly asked on how much of the evidence you had read, including whether you had read the blog, and stating the clear list of what you had read (without the blog being included in your list) is an admission that, at that point in time, you had not read the blog. The actively evasive phrasing does not change this fact.
Here I do not agree, I am not perfect, but when you have those 2 questioning the validation of my votes every time is annoying, I gave many advices to stop, because not only to me, but to the votes of maverick and dalesan. And maybe you know this but I used to be just a Content Moderator and even then I was asked for a lot of evaluations on a daily basis and I did it and still had too many people questioning and invalidating my vote until I hit rock bottom here and decided to stop giving evaluations, so I get a thorn every time someone tries to invalidate my vote with nonsense excuses and obviously I will never insult them or anything, I will simply ask them to stop because it is annoying.I believe it is a necessity for our wiki to function to its best capacity that staff members with evaluation rights give content revision threads adequate consideration, and I do not believe adequacy was demonstrated here.
Very well, then. Evidently, this was a misunderstanding. I apologise for any needless stress.I myself clarified having read the blog in this thread, same information + scans. I hope this clarifies that I did read everything that was proposed.
valid concern, except there is no developer-like character in Ciel-sensei. Neco arc says "I" have to get this patched stat. Developers can file their own bug reports that they encounter to fix later. Ciel even says if you want to make a choice that leans towards arcueid, thats fine, but i cant guarantee what happens to the town afterward. Neco instantly goes to try and choose arcueid, implying no gap of time at all.DarkGrath
Out of respect to your case, I've decided to take a thorough look through the thread, including the scene in which the feat occurs and your arguments regarding it.
Nothing about this is tier 1. Even if we take the scene itself as valid canonicity, filing a bug report to ask the developer to make a new ending is manifestly just a 4th wall break. We don't scale characters off of scenes like this, and this was clearly established on the thread itself. Unless you have genuinely novel input to provide regarding the feat, I would suggest this topic is dropped.
The main purpose of this forum is to discuss how to properly index the statistics of characters from a wide variety of different fictional franchises.