• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DarkGrath
Reaction score
5,786

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Feel free to contact me anytime for help! I may be busy with IRL obligations from time to time, but I will endeavour to be available when I am needed.
    859680447395135498.gif
    Sry to disturb , but would u mind checking my crt , plz 🙏

    Need some input here if possible.

    Please Rate
    Do you mind checking my response out when you have time?
    Dinozxd
    Dinozxd
    Ah, that's a relief. Thanks for trying to solve this problem equally and respecting us.
    Dinozxd
    Dinozxd
    Hey Grath. My apoligies for disturbing you once again. Dereck gave his approval about the Fear Inducement and Limited Durability Negation stuff but he still disagrees with the Paralysis Inducement which you have your approval on. Do you mind stopping by once again and re-evaluate that? It would be greatly appreciated.
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    I'll take a look.

    can this thread be reopen?
    1. it didnt even reach the disagreement limit to be closed and
    2. I had a grandtotal of 10 minutes to create a counterargument before closure, which is not enough
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    Out of respect to your case, I've decided to take a thorough look through the thread, including the scene in which the feat occurs and your arguments regarding it.

    Nothing about this is tier 1. Even if we take the scene itself as valid canonicity, filing a bug report to ask the developer to make a new ending is manifestly just a 4th wall break. We don't scale characters off of scenes like this, and this was clearly established on the thread itself. Unless you have genuinely novel input to provide regarding the feat, I would suggest this topic is dropped.
    BasedNecoScaler69
    BasedNecoScaler69
    DarkGrath
    Out of respect to your case, I've decided to take a thorough look through the thread, including the scene in which the feat occurs and your arguments regarding it.

    Nothing about this is tier 1. Even if we take the scene itself as valid canonicity, filing a bug report to ask the developer to make a new ending is manifestly just a 4th wall break. We don't scale characters off of scenes like this, and this was clearly established on the thread itself. Unless you have genuinely novel input to provide regarding the feat, I would suggest this topic is dropped.
    valid concern, except there is no developer-like character in Ciel-sensei. Neco arc says "I" have to get this patched stat. Developers can file their own bug reports that they encounter to fix later. Ciel even says if you want to make a choice that leans towards arcueid, thats fine, but i cant guarantee what happens to the town afterward. Neco instantly goes to try and choose arcueid, implying no gap of time at all.
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    With all due respect, my message wall is not a debate platform. My investigation of the thread, the sources, and the arguments for and against the change were not done with the intention to continue this debate here - it was to express the fact that I will not be reopening the thread, as it was closed for manifestly valid reasons.

    If you believe that there is genuinely more to discuss, and that there are novel arguments which were not made on the original thread, you are allowed to make a new thread to express these arguments. Making multiple threads on the same refuted topic can constitute a rule violation, but this is almost exclusively enforced in cases of users essentially quoting their last arguments verbatim - if you have new information to provide that wasn't on the original thread, no trouble of this sort should occur.
    Umm, i told him about his unban report and he said he can do conversation if we do a gc, like u me and you here my
    discord :- twilight_op

    Plz send me req so that I can add u to gc ?
    If u can do this it would be great help
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    Understood. I have sent you a friend request on Discord.
    Hi hi,

    may I have permission to repost what was deleted in the TR deletion thread
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    Yes, you may. Do be sure to note that I gave you permission to avoid further confusion.
    You are a good person who seems nice, although you think I'm a sockpuppet I hope you keep up what you're doing, best person on this wiki by far, Idc if I'm banned if all the staff agree but I just wanted to remind you that you're a great person who is reasonable and that you should keep up the good work.

    can you take a look?
    Hı can you take a look ?


    Sorry for distributing. Can I get your input in this thread. Appreciated 🙏.
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    It's generally easier to get a thread looked at sooner if there is less to evaluate. A large wall of text is not only something that can take a while to evaluate, but someone who is asked to evaluate it would be more likely to put it on the backlog to deal with shorter threads first.

    That being said, there's no obligation to change anything at this point.
    TheDarkTriadz
    TheDarkTriadz
    You're a hero 🙏
    TheDarkTriadz
    TheDarkTriadz
    Hey, replied to your reply, take your time replying, just wanted to tell you, sorry
    Could you take a look at this
    My apologies to everyone who has been waiting on responses to threads. I have recently been attending to university exams, and so I have not had the time for usual moderation duties. My studies have now concluded, so I will now be going through and responding to any requests that still need to be attended to.
    Hello.
    Could you sign off on this thread please?

    Hello, can you take a look at this when you are free?


    Can you please look at my Viego scale and comment?
    Would u mind giving me your input on my smol crt
    🙏
    Hello.
    Can I get your input here please?
    Hi Dark, can you give your input in this very important thread, please? Thanks!
    Apex_Predator_GX
    DarkGrath
    DarkGrath
    I apologise for my delayed response. I have seen your messages - I'm just incredibly occupied with important life matters at the moment, and haven't had the time to respond. I promise I will make the time to respond to your thread soon.
    Apex_Predator_GX
    Apex_Predator_GX
    No worries, I understand.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top