This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The particular number of light elements involved does interest me - how tens of thousands were involved in the original feat, and the sun can maintain luminosity with several hundreds removed - but I'm not sure if this enables us to deduce anything more than we know at present.
Unfortunately, I...
Apologies if this seems pedantic, but - the last sentence interests me. 'The majority of the light elements had expired, having completed their...'. What does the next section after this scan say?
Can you provide a scan for the last one? The scans in the OP end with the monsters 'crumbling into liquid form', so I don't know what the text says for the last part.
At this stage, I'm not content with a possibly rating. I can acknowledge intuitions as much as I would like, but I still don't believe this justification meets the standard of being 'reliable to a notable, but mild' degree as established for possibly ratings on the Attack Potency page. It's just...
I've read through the posts made on the topic since my last evaluation.
My stance has ultimately not changed, though I am pleased that the open questions I expressed were thoroughly explained. I believe Agnaa's post here most clearly summarises the underlying issue I have with the arguments...
I have had much less time than usual for the past couple of months due to IRL obligations, hence Mizuki's stated trouble. However, I do try to make time to evaluate CRTs that have been delayed for an unusually long time or need a tie-breaker to proceed, especially so if other staff are not...
I was originally going to write a fairly long response, but I don't think a lot of what I could say is really necessary or beneficial to the discussion. Mainly, I just think this part needs to be stressed here, as I'm not completely sure the implications of it have been understood through the...
I would like to make (hopefully) a final post about this matter.
I acknowledged in a previous post, roughly 11 hours ago now, that conduct on this thread was becoming increasingly problematic, and that it is in all of our best interests that this issue is nipped in the bud and that further...
A note regarding the recent posts - let's stick to the facts of the matter, please. We have all seen threads like these go sideways when we get caught up over intentions and the people over the arguments. I don't think any of us wants this to be 'that thread over a minor ability change that...
I cannot give input immediately, but hopefully some time in the next 24 hours will suffice?
(I thought you had pinged me for a different SAO thread when I saw the title. Somehow 1-A SAO didn't sound immediately suspicious.)
I would need to review the GoW lore - and particularly, looking at the novel for myself may be useful in this regard - to say for sure how the Moirai's alterations of fate work. However, off of what I already know, this seems tenuous.
The very reason there are three sisters of fate instead of...
I have been asked to provide input here.
Importantly, I feel I should acknowledge this issue, since it was a clear point of confusion earlier in the discussion.
'Burden of proof' is not a difficult thing to discern - when you have a situation where multiple conclusions are possible, and you...
I have blocked Mehmet paşa gönlüm 4fkjd's main site account. I cannot tell if they have a forum account, however. The username doesn't bring up any matches.
I would think this warrants just instigating a perma-ban and being done with it. Clearly not someone who wants to engage with the site in any beneficial way.
I'll handle it myself if at least one other moderator or admin would find this verdict acceptable.
Is anyone in contact with Topaz who can attest to her emotional state since making the comment? A verdict can be reached either way, but I think it is a relevant extenuating factor. The comment was not acceptable by any standard, but I believe it was also a product of a lapse of judgement at a...
I have been asked to provide input here.
At present, I agree with Agnaa's assessment. It's perfectly within reason that a statement along the lines of "the sun lost its light" - or more precisely in this case, "Solus on the western horizon lost all of its light" - could just refer to the light...
I cannot attend to it immediately, but if you would be content with an evaluation much later today (about 16 hours from now), I would be happy to hear a summary of the main points so I can offer my input.
I've read through the recent posts on the topic, starting from Ultima's summary of the proposal and counterarguments.
In the end, I am content with the tier 0 suggestion, though I share IdiosyncraticLawyer's general feelings on the topic. I don't think this revision is so much a fixing of...
If there is nothing in particular to indicate any shared function between those attacks other than coming from Ei's Gnosis, then I'd say assuming they have the same speed is an inappropriate assumption.
I see the concern here.
Given that the form of the attack is explicitly different than Ei's Lightning, operating as a beam rather than a lightning strike, I would be cautious about saying it shares the same speed. However, perhaps more context on the way that the attacks produced by Ei's Gnosis...
I'm concerned that Ei's Electro attacks would almost certainly not qualify to be considered real lightning, especially so in the linked scene. It's explicitly supernatural in nature, it does not operate as cloud-to-ground lightning, it is directly controlled in its direction and target rather...
I see. You have permission from me to send a reply to the thread. Be sure to note in your reply that you received permission from me to comment.
If you need to make further comments past this point, you will have to ask another administrator/bureaucrat, as I will be unavailable for the next few...
Can you be more precise? For a non-staff member to comment on a Staff Only thread, it is expected that their input will be novel and valuable to the conclusion of the thread. I need to know what you're intending to say to judge this.
A reminder that this is a Staff Discussion thread. Please request permission from a moderator, administrator, or bureaucrat to comment here.
For full clarification - I approve the creation of this thread and give permission to the thread creator to comment on it.
I'm content with the suggestions. I slightly prefer Agnaa's suggestion, as I could imagine the added practical example being helpful for determining what meets the criteria for Extradimensional in future revisions. But I'm willing to support either if others find Ant's suggestion more agreeable.
We've recently demoted @TheUnshakableOne from her position as a translation helper and banned her for 4 months due to various bits of evidence that point towards her not actually knowing Japanese, and simply using machine translation, on at least one occasion seemingly with intent to...
Milly_Rocking_Bandit has requested for this thread to be closed, due to the discussion detracting from the original intention of the thread as a notice for upcoming revisions. I will be closing this shortly. Any concerns may be directed to my message wall.
This is deceitful and ill-intentioned conduct, and we've been clear in the past about the important role of trust in the importance of managing the site. However, considering that they have not received a ban for this type of conduct in the past, and that the nature of the offense has a limited...
I support this. I prefer 'Notable Matchups', because it ties in with the phrasing of 'Notable Victories/Losses' in a way that looks natural. However, I'd support the change either way.
So the 'underground' is a void, the peak of the Trevor Tower is beyond the underground in such a way that is inaccessible from the rest of the void, and Edison 'exists' on the peak? Barring that this series sounds like it has a strange concept of what 'nonexistent' means, I'm content with...
Thank you for your patience - I am aware you've pinged me multiple times for this, I just haven't had the time for an evaluation.
Owing to not being aware of the series, I can only evaluate what's provided in the scans. But it looks reasonable. My main qualm is that the 'defining what is and is...