- 1,744
- 1,165
She's 4-5 years older than me..... that's quite a surprise.She is 24 years old and should be mature enough about shit. Instead she’s the most immature user I’ve seen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She's 4-5 years older than me..... that's quite a surprise.She is 24 years old and should be mature enough about shit. Instead she’s the most immature user I’ve seen.
She said 1996 or 1997. I’m literally 17 and more mature than her.... anyways I think she shouldn’t actually be perm banned, probably just 6 monthsShe's 4-5 years older than me..... that's quite a surprise.
Fine with me.Is 6 months fine with Medeus and other staff members here?
It's listed in Blackbeard's edit history
Hold up there mate, 6 months is definitely being much too generous. If she had a sockpuppet due to the original one getting banned then a permanent ban seems to be in order. Especially if said user is doing nothing to help out the wiki, and instead are just being toxic, by intentionally attempting to instigate flame wars between fandom's, spreading various slanderous lies. (If you check out the wall Discussions between her and Dragon the user said I went around calling people on Discord ********, which I've never done. I don't even know this person, and I don't share any servers with them either.)Is 6 months fine with Medeus and other staff members here?
Undid one of his editsUm... I think this speaks for itself
Strict warning telling him not to be a ********.
sorry lolCan you stop clogging RVR? We get your point lol.
Long messages are very appropriate for explaining stances in this thread. It's not clogging, and if anything, this comment further clogs this up with unnecessary comments.Can you stop clogging RVR? We get your point lol.
The comment itself was completely unnecessary, and the situation didn't need any explaining. It was simple and clear, a guy said some bad shit, let's deal with it. It did not require a long message like that.Long messages are very appropriate for explaining stances in this thread. It's not clogging, and if anything, this comment further clogs this up with unnecessary comments.
If the person wants their name on the supporters section, it's perfectly fine to add them.not sure if this breaks any rules but i need reassurance before i do this
im adding someone to the supporters list to a verse because they say its locked for them
does that break any rules?
I gave him a strict warning and pinged him on the thread.
Well, as our rules say regarding this issue, members should preferably only add themselves if they are willing to help out with content revision threads in this forum.If the person wants their name on the supporters section, it's perfectly fine to add them.
Thank you for helping out.I gave him a strict warning and pinged him on the thread.
I've undone the changes.
He did it againI've undone the changes.
I've banned them for a month, for repeatedly vandalizing the page.This user keeps vandalizing Maple's pageLuigiman200
vsbattles.fandom.com