- 31,630
- 34,647
I think banning them for 3 to 6 months was what Fandom staff usually does for deliberately violating the Fandom's TOS policy on slur words based on what Antvasima said a while back when Dragomer did the same thing.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,322
I think that Kepekley was banned for 2 months by Fandom for quoting another member that used the n-word.
Anyway, as far as I understand, certain African-Americans use the n-word ending with "a" as an internal slang term between themselves, whereas many others find it offensive in that context as well, and it does not seem to have been used as an insult here, so maybe a 1 or 2 months block would be sufficient, given the lack of previously caused problems from this member?
Anyway, as far as I understand, certain African-Americans use the n-word ending with "a" as an internal slang term between themselves, whereas many others find it offensive in that context as well, and it does not seem to have been used as an insult here, so maybe a 1 or 2 months block would be sufficient, given the lack of previously caused problems from this member?
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,323
Also, this is technically a vulgar death threat, although likely used in an insincere, if meanspirited, manner. A temporary block seems in order here as well.
I would appreciate further staff input regarding both of the above issues.
- 11,807
- 7,371
Meh I mean we don't know Kardashev's race, and it's a blatant bypass regardless since we literally don't allow the message to be posted.
DDM's suggestion for us echoing FANDOM's policies seem accurate
- 31,574
- 28,024
I agree with DDM. There is no need for that kind of language on here.
- 11,807
- 7,371
Yeah
- 31,574
- 28,024
I agree to 3 months.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,329
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,639
- 2,831
I'm fine with that.
MrKerf
He/Him- 2,101
- 842
So, clarification needed. If it is used as a slang word, with no malicious intent, would a person get banned/warned, etc?
- 31,574
- 28,024
Yes, they'd get banned. Just don't use the word.
- 7,869
- 2,806
Yeah, it's fine
- 31,630
- 34,647
Just a recap, what happened was that TimmyQuivy was the main observer among Fandom staff at the time. And he actually banned Kepekley permanently. But when he got replaced with a different fandom staff; the other fandom staff member agreed that that was far too extreme and reduced it to 2 months. PaChi was also once permabanned by Timmy just for testing the script, but when shared the details, it was reduced for like a week or two but told us to inform the community to avoid attempting to test the script.
Now back to the main topic, it's not so much for using the word and he may not have been using it for malicious intentions such as racial context, but he still attempted to bypass a filter that 100% was in his face which is a blatant ignorance issue. And for that, a short ban as a precaution before other Fandom staff may give one that could potentially be too harsh is necessary. So 3 months for the slur word filter bypass is good to me as I said.
- 18,922
- 13,942
Trafalgar Law
Trafalgar D. Water Law is the captain of the Heart Pirates and one of the eleven pirates dubbed with the moniker "Supernova". He's a very laid-back person, and while his speech is very polite, he has no problem with taking mocking jabs at people or giving them the middle finger. Law ate the...
vsbattles.fandom.com
No CRT
- 31,574
- 28,024
Trafalgar Law
Trafalgar D. Water Law is the captain of the Heart Pirates and one of the eleven pirates dubbed with the moniker "Supernova". He's a very laid-back person, and while his speech is very polite, he has no problem with taking mocking jabs at people or giving them the middle finger. Law ate the...
No CRT
Taken care of it.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,342
Also, about this...
- 31,574
- 28,024
Temporary block seems fine to me. What do you think the length should be @Antvasima
AceOfSpaces3709
He/Him- 1,886
- 878
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,639
- 2,831
Banned the user who made it and deleted the page, it was nothing but gibberish.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,346
I am not sure. Would 1 month be appropriate?
- 31,574
- 28,024
Sure. Sounds fine.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,348
Thank you, but please remember to enable the IP-blocking feature in the future.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,349
Okay. What should the ban justification text say?
- 16,171
- 12,705
I would like to report @XXKINGXX69 for the following reasons:
- Commonly insults people as he's losing a debate, sometimes even claiming that his opponent knows nothing about the verse in question or that literally everyone in a debate but him is unreliable (because they disagreed with him), this after explicitly targeting certain users in the same thread. Most extreme example of this is literally reporting someone for disagreeing with his CRT after losing a debate.
- Sir Ovens has warned him about this behavior, so it cannot be assumed he's unaware that he's being annoying/unpleasant in the newer examples.
- Speaking of being warned, replying to criticism with "your mom" jokes is something he was also warned about, yet keeps doing.
- Speaking of insults, here's a good one, once again, prompted by KING losing a debate.
- Claims a character has a Low 2-C feat, then goes back on it, claiming it to be a joke, then makes a similar claim again but then goes back on it again, claiming he just heard of it, which is the most blatant trolling I've ever seen.
- Afterwards, threatens to make a 3-A profile for the verse anyway despite having lost the debate.
- Note that he has claimed characters are certain tiers then gone back on it claiming it to be a joke on other occasions too. Here's another example.
- Upon one of his threads being rejected and locked, he immediately makes it again without even acknowledging the reasons it was rejected.
- Makes incredibly extraordinary claims in a thread and constantly refuses to bring up additional proof or scans when requested to by like, five people, most of them staff.
- In fact, he makes a lot of threads without bringing up any scans. Or evidence at all, really.
- Crashes a random, peaceful conversation about Sentry comics by saying, completely unprompted, that "Sentry's ass and Batman is better".
- Stonewalls debates pretty often.
- Insults Confluctor and Marvel fans, which I think was meant to be a joke but really falls flat all things considered, this being another example of making pseudo-jokey insults after losing a debate. Here's a similar one.
- Generally has an issue with making very unfunny jokes during debates. Obviously some levity during Vs Debates and even CRTs is perfectly fine but again, this constantly puts an halt to discussions without any benefit and is often a little unpleasant or insulting, to the point that he's been warned for it.
- He also has a fixation with asking for scans about the most random stuff, including things that literally cannot have scans, even just personal opinions or interpretations of statements. I think this is his idea of a joke, at least sometimes, but again, it's very annoying, pointless trolling and just halts a debate to a screeching halt. Sometimes, the scans have even been posted already.
- As a reminder, here's another example of him making weird claims without providing a hint of evidence, and here's another of him making a claim and then admitting he doesn't actually know the character in question.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,352
Also, we still have to deal with this.
- 16,171
- 12,705
I don't think it's for me to say since I'm the one making the report
- 11,141
- 14,169
His behavior has always been kinda bad. Several small things do pile up to become big. He needs to clean up his act. A month or two should be fine for now and we can see where it goes from there imo.
- 3,128
- 1,714
Have they been mentioned here before?
- 16,171
- 12,705
They have received warnings, not sure if specifically here.
Edit: KING has been officially warned here already.
Edit: KING has been officially warned here already.
- 168,514
- 77,227
- Thread starter
- #11,359
Hmm. He seems to be spreading a general bad mood in this community. I think that an at least 6 months long ban may be necessary.
- 43,093
- 37,229
Honestly, it is rare someone is so bad I actuall straight up avoid debates with them, but King is there with his stonewalling and insults honestly
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Featured
- Locked
