• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact AKM sama if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Agnaa
Reaction score
7,474

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Excuse me, sorry to interrupt your time...
    So I have made a blog calculation, I have also posted it on the evaluation forum, and have asked one of the staff to correct the calculation. However, until now no one has corrected it, so, if you have free time, please correct my calculation
    Yo, Agnaa. I need some calc-ing advice regarding this calc of mine. No need to approve or look at it. I just need you to answer a question. You see: calc features a tree and an explosion, but can't see the full height of either the tree or explosion due to weird camera angle, the only person who raised an issue with this is a person called @TheRustyOne.

    However, I repeatedly asked KLOL if this is an issue but received no confirmations 3+ times, and a person named @Chariot190 has stated that "the amount of tree cut off, and the amount of explosion cut off, should be about the same. Though that still doesn't mean it's perfect pixel scaling given how pixel scaling works, but it shouldn't be THAT far off from the true yield."

    Can you tell me what I should do, Agnaa?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    You might be able to scale off the tree trunk's width, if that's a known value.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    I'm back to ask another question because I regard you as extremely reliable on matters like this. In regards to feats that aren't shown directly but are directly stated and visual confirmation of it happening, is there no need to calc it? To explain my reason for asking this, basically, I have a character that directly stated that they moved shipping containers/trailers and the camera pans out to show several shipping containers/trailers stacked atop of each other - there is also a statement that this character did it all by themselves and with no help. Essentially, this is a decent LS feat.

    So... is there no need to calc this feat, and just assume the low-ball weight of a shipping container/trailer and call it a day?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    You could do that. It'd technically still be a calculation, just a really simple one.
    Been calcing something from a book that was adopted into a tv show, and have a question to ask. Basically, I have a feat in the book that was in the show and was exactly the same but showed the general timeframe on how long the feat took. The feat in the book doesn't have a timeframe for how long it took, so can I use the timeframe from the tv show?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    That's sorta something that's up to experts in the verse, but it's probably allowed.

    It may not be allowed if the show seriously diverges from the book in a fuckton of ways, if there's multiple adaptations and you're cherrypicking one that has the best timeframe, or if there's some other weirdness that makes it non-canon.

    But 99% of the time it'd be okay as long as the feat's the same.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Thank you. The tv show shouldn't have any of the issues that you presented, so no worries.

    Although, I do have one more question... it regards the feat itself. Basically, the person in question punched another person 2-to-3 kilometers away, the distance was expressed in an internal monologue that was cut from the tv show but should still apply... Getting to the point, I just need to apply the kinetic energy formula, 0.5*(weight)*(speed)^2, right?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Hi! So, in the matchs addition thread is there a incognito as if Guts vs Yoriichi would be valide to be added in the profiles considering there was a misunderstood regarding the Berserk Armor

    I personally don't think that this was the main point of debate or that it would change the opinion of anyone regarding the result, but i would very much appreciate you opinion regarding this
    Hey, hey, fanta here! Agnaa, I need you to look at this calc. It isn't mine, but another person, however, it features calcs that support a calc of mine in the verse that will be very helpful in proving my calc isn't an outliner. If you have any issue with the calc, I could contact the creator and ask them to fix the issue.

    Hello Agnaa, this is a 9-A calc not only useful for the Platinum Sperm and Golden Sperm multipliers (which you pointed out needs a new value as the Jet Nice Guy calc was incorrect) but also for the featless Demon Level threats and A class heroes in One Punch Man since the Sky Folk Tiger level 8-B scaling is now invalid.

    The monster was defeated by Snek, the lowest ranked A class hero so it fits the bill of "average A class hero that a single Black Sperm cell can defeat" and the rest of the A class should be superior or comparable to him. The monster is also a Tiger level threat so featless Demon levels would upscale from it

    Would you mind evaluating it? Kulf Boba, the author of the calc, gave me permission to ask for evaluations for this calc. Thank you for your time.
    Oi Agaga, are you perhaps knowledge about our piercing energy rules regarding bullets? I have heard that you need durability far higher than the energy the bullet carries due to surface stuff. So following situation: Character A uses rubber bullets with a custom gun, based on a exosting model. Said gun and rubber bullet can cleanly shoot through car doors, like a normal gun could. Now Character B gets shot at with said weapon, but does not take any life threatening damage and looks generally unharmed (No penetration through the bullet, no blood drawn). Would that yield anything higher than the kinetic energy of the bullet?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    We allowed it briefly in 2 verses ~4 years ago, but we decided to stop using it. We only use surface area to nerf feats (characters not tanking the full surface area of explosions), not to buff feats (no-selling attacks with small surface areas compared to their body).
    Do you dislike using quotes? What are reasons? I can't find one since the notification remain same tbh
    Dread
    Dread
    You can edit both and write in both source editing if you know how BB code works. For example, I am struggling with HR line, so I need to switch to BB code to make my threads look better (take an example of Acc type 5 thread). Unsure what you do you mean, but controlling where the quote begins or ends can work in BB code, at least for me. Btw, I think I understand now, you see “undo/redo” signs? The bracket is BB code source editor.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Oh shit, I never noticed that lmao. I'll get to using that then. Thanks.

    I tried looking in the "more options" menus but couldn't find it, and didn't think that button would do anything useful.
    Dread
    Dread
    HAHAHAHHA, then I helped your future with this. Imao, I am using it constantly, so anything you want, you can ask me. I am an expert (solved tons of issues with bb code XD)
    Sorry to bother, but since you are knowledgeable with various things and I believe to have saw you sometimes in threads regarding higher d stuff I wanted to solve a question I have.

    Sending someone to a higher dimensional realm mean that said bfr is stronger/more potent than a bfr that send someone to a three dimensional place? The dimensionality of the destination really affect the potency of the bfr or just the range of it? Have saw different opinions regarding this so I would like to solve this doubt.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    idk
    Expectro2000xxx
    Expectro2000xxx
    I see, no problem then, will try asking another staff to see.
    Hey, hey, fanta here! Ready to throw you two questions at once!

    First off, since I have seen that you are a Medaka Box Supporter... Any idea on where the 8-B Rating for Medaka Box chars come from? Am just confused on why they are 8-Bs, tbh.

    Secondly. remember the user blog that contains three calcs that you refused to look at it... I just wanna ask. in your opinion, should I just split it up to three different user blogs or should I keep them where they are?
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here. Just want to say that I made the edits to my user blog that you told me to do. Now, the result are 9-A, which is a bit saddening but results are results (even if the characters in whom this user blog might apply to are already 8-C Tier and my og intent was to upgrade them to a higher tier, kek). I also found a cloud feat as I was looking for the stat sheet for a Glasgow, calc'ed it, and found that it might be applicable to characters' physical stats, so yay, I suppose-lucky me, kek.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Really I'd expect it to be 9-B with how thin those doors are.

    If you asked whether it'd be an upgrade on 8-C I'd have told you it definitely wouldn't have been.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Kek, true true.

    Thanks for your help, tho.
    Hello Agnaa

    Since you're one of the knowledgeable member of the Medaka Box verse, and a calculation group member, can you give your input regarding this thread please?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I absolutely can.
    Hey, hey, Fanta here. It's that time of the day again, Agnna. Less of a help for calc but more asking for calc advice.

    Basically, I have something I want pixel scaled for attack potency purposes.

    However, it is impossible to get one of the dimensions (width) to find out its volume in its shot, however, there is another shot that showcases a good shot of the thing I want pixel scaled - and has a thing with a known height that can help pixel scale - so it is possible I can use this image to get the dimensions, thus, its volume or no and I have to make do with the first shot even if I can't find that thing's width?
    Hey, hey, fanta here! It is time for moi to ask for your help in looking into my calc and telling me of the errors/approving it.


    Three calcs in one user blog - thankfully, each calc only has one result each. The first two calcs are the ones that I talked about you extensively about in the past few days. And the last one is just a simple ground explosion calc. Truthfully, you can just look at one, and I can find other CGM to ask (read: bug) about this.

    Also to explain: first calc is about a superweapon(s) that consistently one-shot people, second calc is about the physical stats of people in the verse, and the third calc relates to the weapons that the character in the verse hold and use... Yes, I am going to use this in a CRT, if you are wondering.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I am going to have to reject your request.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Tis fine, thank you for your quick reply, tho!
    Yo, am I allowed to comment on the staff only thread for acausality type 5 for warhammer specifically?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Sure, I remember you being knowledgeable and reasonable. Thanks for asking.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Okay actually that turned out to be kinda useless, DaReaperMan already posted that scan. Consider deleting that post, I guess?
    Blackcurrant91
    Hey, hey, fanta here. I am 'bout to show ya something, it is a picture of a hole. I need your opinion about its shape. A good friend of mind told me to use rectangular volume for it -
    and I can do that, I have another frame of the same shot that shows a person passing through the hole to pixel scale from, and the picture you see now is something I picked out in order to help you judge the best shape, thus, I wanna hear your opinion about this. Also, to say it now, this is about the last calc-related thing you should hear from me for awhile, don't want to bother you more than I already have about calc stuff.

    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Wait, is the hole you're calculating just the one in the door, or is it including everything behind it?
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Just the one in the door.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    V. Frag, imo. But you can just list multiple ends and whoever evaluates it will pick one.
    About Acausality 5 having nobody who qualifies...

    Warhammer Acausality 5 is probably still fine, they've got feats of being unaffected by even Irregular flows of Causality and the only things that interact with anything from the warp in either 40K, AoS, or Fantasy, are magical/enchanted weapons or straight magic. Kinda like a NEP 2 being socking another NEP 2 being, it's using the exact same stuff they're made of in the first place on them
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    idk, you can bring that up in the thread tho.
    I agree with your reasoning and disagreement on that topic. It seems rather punishing person where there the rule itself allowed him.
    I struggled to debate on it because it seems for me incon (with old rules).
    Dread
    Dread
    Don't you see the reasoning behind the topic ban is unfair itself? The staff is still debating on who will win.
    The Vs. thread itself is not against wiki rules. I won't talk anymore there. But I simply want to know which rule he violated.
    This is all, and I believe transparency in judgment is best. Involving his old past violations (he mentioned he only did this one, and the old previous are 2 years old) is a bad argument to begin with because those old violations are already dealt with.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    If you don't know all the reasons that Goku vs Saul would be unworkable (Goku being able to nuke Saul from 4km away as soon as the match starts, dearth of information on Goku's motivations and no way to stall for time to discover them, Goku being able to power up and speed blitz, Saul's convincing taking time that he doesn't have, Saul's convincing having worked in limited situations and still resulted in bodily harm coming to the people involved to the extent of probably being ruled an incap loss, Saul's convincing having numerous anti-feats), despite knowing one of the verses involved well, then you can't really be trusted to make reasonable matches involving that verse.
    • Like
    Reactions: Dread
    Dread
    Dread
    Understandable. I won't comment anymore.
    Hello, hello.

    I saw the notifications on two of my calc blogs. Thanks for the notifs, but is the other method in those blogs okay
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    It's much closer, but not quite. The main substantive thing, is that I'd use the density of flame (0.3 kg/m^3) instead of the density of air. And I use veeery slightly different values for temperature change and heat capacity, but those would barely change the results at all. You can see this calc for an example.
    Hey, hey, fanta here, and I require your help... not input on my calcs, but I need your knowledge (again).


    Do you know the possible correct shape for this? I can't make heads or tails of it.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    What do you need the middle value for?

    But it would be 0.13 + ((0.2-0.13)/2), or 0.165
    Guutszz
    Guutszz
    hmm I'm arguing with my friend actually. And, is this different from the average formula in mathematics?
    Example: (0.2+0.3+0.4 ........ 0.11+0.12+0.13) Then divided by how many data there are?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    The conventional average formula doesn't really work for infinite sets; there's an infinite amount of values between 0.2 and 0.13

    But there's many ways to reach the answer I described. (0.2+0.13)/2 also reaches the same answer for all endpoints.

    And intuitively, you could imagine it working the same way as the ordinary average formula. If you add each of the numbers on either side of the extreme, the average of that pair would cancel out to the midpoint. That gets done for every single number in the infinite set.
    Hey, hey, fanta here. Small question... How do you find the cubic meter (m^3) value to find the volume for humanoid-shaped things? Genuinely curious, and wonder if you know or is just really simple - like I just need to find a meter to cubic meter converter online or smth.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, it's Fanta again, and I wish to inform you of what I did with the information you gave me, well... It's dumb, but, basically, I used the height of a giant mecha (6.94m) and ^3 times it in order to get a volume of 334.3m - afterwards, I used the fact that the mecha was composed out of tungsten and multiplied the volume value I got by the V.Frag Value of Tungsten [1412.5 J/cc].

    ... To make it more quicker to understand, here's the formula I used.

    334.3 m^3 * 1412.5 J/cc = 472198750000 joules, or 112.86 Tons.

    Is there anything wrong with this formula itself, and if so, could you tell me?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Main concern I could have is that giant mechas wouldn't usually be completely solid, like the human body is, so you'd need to reduce that number based on how hollow the mech seems.

    If it seems to be 20% air, you'd multiply it by 0.8, if it seems to be 50% air, multiply by 0.5, etc.

    Also, could be a bit strange to assume tungsten for literally the entire thing, including cables and all of that. V. Frag may or may not be accurate. Etc.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    True, true. Hm... There is a cockpit area, so maybe 0.8 to 0.5 might be fine. Idk. Never done something like this before.

    And I know, but tungsten is the only confirmed material, so can't really guess. And I am assuming V.Frag cuz it explicitly shows very small shards of metal flying onwards after they explode, could settle for Frag, tho.
    Hey, hey, fanta here!

    Agnaa, could you check if I do the numbers right in this calc? It is the thing that I asked for your help for, y'know, the big hole. I literally just want to know if I did the math right, and didn't screw up somewhere.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I ran the numbers for one of the triangles, and you applied it perfectly.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Thanks, mate! From here on, won't be bothering ya about this calc. Got everything I wanted answered, answered! And now I wait for other CGM to check out my calc and get their two cents 'bout it.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    No problem buddy.
    azontr
    azontr
    Alright, thanks!
    Drite77
    Drite77
    Heeeey, sorry for bringing this up here since Fandom is a bitch and won't notify us

    The reason why I don't think I should double the result is because they have 2 arms. When one arm punches, the other is in standby, and when they retrieve their arm, the other punches at the same time.

    They weren't punching with one hand or don't have 2 arms
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    idk if that really matters. Their total movement is 398-400 arm lengths, even if it was done with two limbs.

    You can ask another calc group member, but I think doubling would be ideal. If they say otherwise, then I'll fold. I am relatively new to this, after all.
    Hey, hey, I got a question to ask.

    Would it be okay for me to make a user blog that features 3 different calcs from the same show in one user blog? Kinda wanted to make three different user blogs but figured that would be too troublesome and tiresome for CGMs.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I'm not sure what destruction values we give for asphalt.

    Using the shapes I drew, I'd do area of a triangle (green triangle 1) + area of a triangle (green triangle 2) + area of an ellipsis (green circle) - area of an ellipsis (yellow circle), and then multiply all of that by the depth. If the crater has an uneven depth, it would be really difficult to account for because of the weird doughnut + triangular indent it's got going on.

    I'd say just a depth of 5.7m for seeming taller than the robots. I wouldn't bother pixel-scaling.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    I'll figure out the destruction values for asphalt later... Probably settle for just cement or just rocks to make it simpler.

    Thank you for your help. See you later, I suppose.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, I am in the finishing touches of my calc - and am going to actually put it in a user blog soon, but want to get something clear first.

    When you said do the area of the shapes and multipy them by the depth do you mean smth like this - example: 7m (base of a triangle times 4m (height of a triangle) times 5.7m (the depth of 5.7m that you mentioned I should use) to get their cubic centimeter / cubic meter?

    Also, once I get all of the cubic centimeter / cubic meter for all of the shapes, do I add them up altogether and then multiply them by the pulverization value of concrete and/or rock?

    Just making sure since I haven't done a calc like this before.
    Could you open up the Doctor Doom page for just a sec?

    I just want to remove the justification of Doom "destroying Doombots almost comparable to him", since that statement means nothing in scaling and just seems so weird.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Doctor Doom's getting changed real soon, iirc. You should ask in this thread about it.
    Eseseso
    Eseseso
    The thread already did their change and relocked the page, but I'll re ask
    @Agnaa Do you know if this is a galaxy or universe, or some shiz like that?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    The terrible quality makes it too hard to tell.

    Pinging me does nothing btw. Only staff members give notifications by pinging, and I already get notifications for posts on my wall.
    JTGamer96
    JTGamer96
    I don't suppose you can calculate it, can you?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Nope.

    If you still want me to eyeball from that video, it looks more like a protostar/proto-solar system. Maybe less because of the relative sizes of the characters/spaceships.

    But I could be missing some details that indicate it's a galaxy/universe in the low quality.
    Hello, I would appreciate if you could evaluate this calc. Thanks in advance
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I will not be evaluating that calc.
    RoTt35
    RoTt35
    Np, thanks anyways
    Ello, simple question if you don't mind, but if we have a statement about a character shaking an entire forest, but the forest size wasn't mentioned, what can I do to calc it? Or is it just unquantifiable?
    Hi there, may I ask a question about lifting strength?

    If there were characters A and B with comparable AP but B had superior lifting strength, then would B be able to crush A with LS with ease?
    Suuuuuup, I don't know if you didn't get a notification (Because I didn't) of the evaluation here but:
    He gave the scan for the 3/4s of a month and it checks out.
    The ship doesn't really have any description itself. Prob could change the speed to a 1800s ship instead of a modern day one if needed
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I left the question in the calc's comments, but I'll repost here.

    Can you post where you got that formula from? I don't recognize it. And using another formula I've seen accepted in other calcs, I got a result about 3.53x lower. So either you're using the formula incorrectly, or one of these calcs needs to be updated.
    Drite77
    Drite77
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Oh, airburst vs ground, doh. Yeah that's fine.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I'm glad that I don't have to because I won't :3
    Arnoldstone18
    Arnoldstone18
    41ee9620-7454-49a5-a080-e7467b8efad0.png


    Understandable 🫠
    Hey, got a calc you could do for me if u can. I'm struggling to figure out what to use and how to calc it really given the type of reaction speed.
    0091-013.png

    0091-014.png


    The projectiles are all moving at mach 3 and the guy reacting is 6ft. and the sword is is moving, he's not swinging it to react to them, that sword just fast.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I don't understand what the hell's going on here. How do know the projectiles are moving at mach 3?
    Arkenis
    Arkenis
    They're stated to in previous chapter.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    It would be best to link that statement as well when asking for the calc to be made, but idk how to calc that, sorry.
    Hey, hey, would it be possible for you to look this calc? ... The first one, to be exact. It is simply a calc that calc a giant's size and GPE to get its AP - it (and the lesser calc) serves as the foundation for an entire verse, but I really just need somebody to see if I fudge smth up with the giant calc.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I'm putting calc evals off for a minute. I might get to it eventually, but you should prolly ask someone else.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Thank you for taking the time to reply, Agn. Will do what you said.
    Hey Agnaa, I'm not sure if you're knowledgable in Pythagoras theorem, but this calc could really use some corrections using that formula.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    The length of the side opposite the right angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the square of the other two sides.
    Hello, and terribly sorry for the both on this, going around to try to get some input.

    I have a fairly important CRT for the verse Puzzle and Dragons, however due to its niche nature it can be really hard to get input on these.

    If you can give your thoughts, it would be greatly apricated, but if not I 100% understand. Either way, thank you so much.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I cannot, sorry m8.
    XitSign
    XitSign
    Totally understandable, thank you for getting back to me!
    Hi, did a calc to some friends about the size of a giant bear and his GPE, when you have free time can you take a look? Based on the comments I did two mistakes but corrected them so I would like confirmation if now is fine.
    Expectro2000xxx
    Expectro2000xxx
    Sorry to bother again, but someone in the comments had a problem with the pixel scaling so in the end I used another image that he posted to pixelscale, so if you could look again at the calc to see if the pixel scaling is fine? The math itself is the same as previously so that part should be good.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Evaluated.
    Expectro2000xxx
    Expectro2000xxx
    Thank once again.
    Hey sorry if I'm disturbing but can you check this calc out? I need it for an urgent revision. Thanks in advance

    Ello! Could you check this calc please? Honestly had no idea what to do, and if using assumptions like that are not allowed. The feat is an important one, but not sure if the method I used for the calc is allowed.
    Rikimarox2
    Rikimarox2
    Ah I'm not sure I understand what to do, do I just use something like this:

    Radius = 50 meters, with the height of 20-30 meters instead of taking the mountain's entire volume? Did you mean I should take like, 0.05% or 0.004% of the volume of the mountain and be done with it?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Naw you'd use either 20m or 50m as the height, derive the radius from that (can be done using the pixel scaling on the mountain/island level requirements page) and use that to get volume.

    Could be another number too if calc group finds it suitable. People might wanna do it the other way and get a certain radius (maybe 100m), derive a height from that through the pixel-scaling, and get volume from that.
    Rikimarox2
    Rikimarox2
    Aha I think I understand. I've redone the calc with the edit, so when you have time, I'd appreciate it if you could check it out. (Let's hope I did it the right way)
    Sorry to bother as soon you become a calc member, but when you have time could you take a quick look to this calculation? Is pretty simple, just calculate the mass of a sphere of water with a stated diameter.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I love an easy calc.
    Expectro2000xxx
    Expectro2000xxx
    And I love you helpful members, thanks for the evaluation.
    • Like
    Reactions: Agnaa
    Howdy mate just wanted to ask if you know what the rolling coefficient between stone and dirt is Smoke needs it for a Slippin Jimmy calculation
    CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
    CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
    Nvm agnaa Saul PUSHED the piece of stone a full PUSH no rolling because Saul (Slippin Jimmy) is a chad B)
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I do not know.
    CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
    CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
    Alr .w. Doesn’t matter for what I’ve already mentioned uvu
    Hi there, I have noticed this thread about Creepypasta and Slenderman-derived work.

    As someone who once followed the Slender Mythos, can I get permission to comment on it?
    Jamesthetaker
    Jamesthetaker
    As someone who once followed the Slender Mythos, I would say that the Marble Hornets, TribeTwelve/EverymanHYBRID, or most Slender-inspired ARGs in general aren't just fanfic.

    The original story of Slenderman was just a story written by Victor Surge and the SomethingAwful Paranormal Thread between 2009 and 2010. The Marble Hornets were the first series to conceptualize the idea of the Slenderman we all know today. They basically create their own version of Slenderman and expand it in their own way.

    Most of the following ARGs were actually inspired by Marble Hornets instead of the original story, and as their story goes on, they turn Slenderman into a rather different being to fit the plot.

    In TribeTwelve, it was a higher being that controlled the world through mortal puppets. In EverymanHYBRID, Slenderman only appeared for the first arcs, and his role became less relevant and the story eventually switched to something else. In DarkHarvest00, it was an eldritch creature worshiped by a cult.

    One thing to be noted is that most of these works above don't refer to the entity as Slenderman (except for EverymanHYBRID): The Administrator, The Operator, Gorr 'Rylaehotep, etc. It's a way that the producer is trying to make their character as distinct from Slenderman as possible.

    Now, the problem here is how the Slender Mythos page is indexed on the wiki. It's basically a composite page that covers every appearance of Slenderman ever, which is a fault because most of them aren't canon to each other or anything. I do remember that EverymanHYBRID and TribeTwelve once had a crossover, but none to other stories/games on the main page.

    I cannot say much about The Creepypasta Collection, but I don't think grouping it with any of the works above is fair because they are each their own story and should have their own separate page.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    That seems good to post!
    Jamesthetaker
    Jamesthetaker
    Thank you.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top