Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[The_Impress]

Meh, I feel as though however, if we're penalizing users for being annoying and "spreading a bad mood", dozens of users can get bans.

I think a month long is fine given the warnings he's received

 

[The_Impress]

He also said this

And also to be fair, he was sorta ganged up on there, if you read the thread.

 

[Armorchompy]

I definitely think a month is too generous, personally.

 

[Arceus0x]

I think that an ongoing "Intelligence sections corrections" wiki management forum thread might be our least bad solution for this problem, so decisions are not made unilaterally in lack of better options.

Sorry for replying here without a report but, was this ever made? I know that non-moderator members with no reports can't post here but this is something i am very interested in...So uhh...I'm here to report a missing thread?

 

[Antvasima]

I definitely think a month is too generous, personally.

Yes, me as well.

 

[Antvasima]

Sorry for replying here without a report but, was this ever made? I know that non-moderator members with no reports can't post here but this is something i am very interested in...So uhh...I'm here to report a missing thread?

I have placed it in my VSB to-do list text file, but haven't found the time and focus to create it yet.

 

[Sir_Ovens]

KING is annoying and incomprehensible but I don't think he's aware of his own faults. While I do think a ban is appropriate, I do not think it should be for as long as 6 months.

If he is wilfully ignorant of his warnings and is deliberately being an absolute troll on purpose, then yeah, toss him into the fire.

 

[Planck69]

A month seems appropriate to me.

 

[Antvasima]

Given the severity and vulgarity of some of his statements, and that he has ignored at least one previous staff warning, I think that 2 months is better in that case.

 

[InfiniteDay]

Should we ping KING so that they can explain themselves?

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I suppose 2 months is fine long for XKing, and same deal with Fandom_0

 

[The_Impress]

Should we ping KING so that they can explain themselves?

We did. The very first report message.

 

[Armorchompy]

Should we ping KING so that they can explain themselves?

I tagged them in the initial post. Maybe we should give them like a day to try to explain themselves before banning.

 

[XXKINGXX69]

I'll respond in like 12 hours I have to work

 

[Armorchompy]

Someone vandalized DMC Nero's page.

 

[Antvasima]

He did not seem malicious, so I gave him a warning:

Manojkkmar

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I'll respond in like 12 hours I have to work

Take your time to defend yourself

 

[Lugh_Tuathe_Dé]

Someone messed with Shin Reglia's Profile

 

[Lugh_Tuathe_Dé]

I reverted the edits

 

[Arceus0x]

I would like to report @XXKINGXX69 for the following reasons:

• Commonly insults people as he's losing a debate, sometimes even claiming that his opponent knows nothing about the verse in question or that literally everyone in a debate but him is unreliable (because they disagreed with him), this after explicitly targeting certain users in the same thread. Most extreme example of this is literally reporting someone for disagreeing with his CRTafter losing a debate.
  • Sir Ovens has warned him about this behavior, so it cannot be assumed he's unaware that he's being annoying/unpleasant in the newer examples.
  • Speaking of being warned, replying to criticism with "your mom" jokes is something he was also warned about, yet keeps doing.
• Speaking of insults, here's a good one, once again, prompted by KING losing a debate.
• Claims a character has a Low 2-C feat, then goes back on it, claiming it to be a joke, then makes a similar claim again but then goes back on it again, claiming he just heard of it, which is the most blatant trolling I've ever seen.
  • Afterwards, threatens to make a 3-A profile for the verse anyway despite having lost the debate.
  • Note that he has claimed characters are certain tiers then gone back on it claiming it to be a joke on other occasions too. Here's another example.
• Upon one of his threads being rejected and locked, he immediately makes it again without even acknowledging the reasons it was rejected.
• Makes incredibly extraordinary claims in a thread and constantly refuses to bring up additional proof or scans when requested to by like, five people, most of them staff.
• In fact, he makes a lot of threads without bringing up any scans. Or evidence at all, really.
• Crashes a random, peaceful conversation about Sentry comics by saying, completely unprompted, that "Sentry's ass and Batman is better".
• Stonewalls debates pretty often.
• Insults Confluctor and Marvel fans, which I think was meant to be a joke but really falls flat all things considered, this being another example of making pseudo-jokey insults after losing a debate. Here's a similar one.
  • Generally has an issue with making very unfunny jokes during debates. Obviously some levity during Vs Debates and even CRTs is perfectly fine but again, this constantly puts an halt to discussions without any benefit and is often a little unpleasant or insulting, to the point that he's been warned for it.
• He also has a fixation with asking for scans about the most random stuff, including things that literally cannot have scans, even just personal opinions or interpretations of statements. I think this is his idea of a joke, at least sometimes, but again, it's very annoying, pointless trolling and just halts a debate to a screeching halt. Sometimes, the scans have even been posted already.
  • As a reminder, here's another example of him making weird claims without providing a hint of evidence, and here's another of him making a claim and then admitting he doesn't actually know the character in question.

I will say though being a bad comedian isn't exactly breaking any rules.

 

[Armorchompy]

That's true, if it was just that I wouldn't report, it's just that a lot of the "jokes" are pretty abrasive or downright insulting, coupled with the rest I think that's report-worthy.

 

[Antvasima]

Someone messed with Shin Reglia's Profile

I reverted the edits

I gave them a warning message:

Ayime.voldigoad

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Bernkastelll]

I gave them a warning message:

Ayime.voldigoad

vsbattles.fandom.com

Maou Gakuin pages should be Locked, there is always someone messing up with it

 

[Antvasima]

It would cause more problems than it solves to lock them all. Regular members would become unable to correct spelling errors in them, for example, and I and other staff members patrol the recent changes.

 

[Arceus0x]

It would cause more problems than it solves to lock them all. Regular members would become unable to correct spelling errors in them, for example, and I and other staff members patrol the recent changes.

I disagree. I understand your concerns but Maou Gaukin is the most vandalized verse besides dragon ball and OPM. We should keep it under lock and key til its necessary to upgrade them again in which case we could chose a designated time to open and close them.

 

[XXKINGXX69]

I never personally attacked someone in most of them (except for Ultima which I got warned for and Confluctor once). And do you really think minor jokes like that are serious? Or me making fun of a fictional character?

Almost everyone here has done it before multiple times, even disrupting CRTs like that with repeated arguments

Makes incredibly extraordinary claims in a thread and constantly refuses to bring up additional proof or scans when requested to by like, five people, most of them staff.

If you read the thread, you'll realise that me and Swerzye were the only one who sent scans for claims, and most people were disregarding my arguments, so if you think I should be punished for this, then Confluctor and jibz should be too (not that I want them to)

Upon one of his threads being rejected and locked, he immediately makes it again without even acknowledging the reasons it was rejected.

That was my fault for ignoring what Armorchompy said in the first post

And I do realise that what I said to Qawsedf that time was insulting. Same with Ultima, and when I accused Confluctor of not reading comics because I was annoyed at what he said, or when I told Arceus0x to stop scaling a verse because I disagreed with him (I don't know why you didn't bring that up). Those are completely my fault

 

[Antvasima]

I disagree. I understand your concerns but Maou Gaukin is the most vandalized verse besides dragon ball and OPM. We should keep it under lock and key til its necessary to upgrade them again in which case we could chose a designated time to open and close them.

I haven't noticed widespread vandalism to several of these pages. I think that we have locked Anos' profile page though.

 

[Dereck03]

I haven't noticed widespread vandalism to several of these pages. I think that we have locked Anos' profile page though.

The most vandaliced are always locked tho... I think we should lock Graham's page

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so.

 

[LordGinSama]

Reporting the user LivinMeme for showing trollish behavior and downright blatant slander and instigating drama here.

 

[The_Axiom_of_Virgo]

Reporting the user LivinMeme for showing trollish behavior and downright blatant slander and instigating drama here.

As someone who quietly observed that train wreck of a CRT, it pretty much derailed into nonsense banter and arguments that went nowhere eventually leading to heated/insulting comments.

The thread is getting closed anyway with a newer more refined CRT on the way in the foreseeable future but I do believe that the unnecessary drama should've been nipped in the bud sooner if not outright prevented tbh.

That's my takeaway from that situation, I'll comment no futher about it and just hope for a satisfactory yet fair outcome in the end.

 

[Aguywhodoesthings]

This fellow who changed Venom's gender to gay and changed his statistics
not only did he no capitalize it but gay isn't even a gender

 

[LordGinSama]

Reporting the user LivinMeme for showing trollish behavior and downright blatant slander and instigating drama here.

^

 

[Antvasima]

This fellow who changed Venom's gender to gay and changed his statistics
not only did he no capitalize it but gay isn't even a gender

I blocked him.

 

[Antvasima]

Reporting the user LivinMeme for showing trollish behavior and downright blatant slander and instigating drama here.

As someone who quietly observed that train wreck of a CRT, it pretty much derailed into nonsense banter and arguments that went nowhere eventually leading to heated/insulting comments.

The thread is getting closed anyway with a newer more refined CRT on the way in the foreseeable future but I do believe that the unnecessary drama should've been nipped in the bud sooner if not outright prevented tbh.

That's my takeaway from that situation, I'll comment no futher about it and just hope for a satisfactory yet fair outcome in the end.

I would appreciate evaluations by other staff members here.

@Livinmeme has not been a problem in the past as far as I recall though.

 

[Livinmeme]

Yeah i derailed the thread but i stopped, and i wasnt the one who insulted in the debate??? gin called me "4 grader reader understanding" and that i didnt go to school several times

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I do not have time to read the entire thread, but I agree with Axiom where it's one of those situations where multiple parties appear to be at fault. I though until an organized analysis is made that, we should refrain from passing judgement to anyone. Either another staff member could take a look, or I can check after my work shift.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out, Medeus.

When checking through the thread, Livinmeme simply seemed to have behaved in a somewhat obnoxious manner, not done anything bannable, and others provoked them as well.

 

[The_Impress]

I think best thing to do is tag all offenders and give them all non-official warnings to improve their behaviour

 

[Livinmeme]

I only acted like that because i on heavy emotional problems on my Real life so i prommise to never do that again