- 32,835
- 38,111
Add this to the list too. It's high time someone took action against him.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 11,807
- 7,371
@Hellbeast There's been a rule change to not allow non-staff to comment anymore on RVR unless they're directly involved in the report, fyi, to avoid clutter
@DaReaperMan and you already know this.
@DaReaperMan and you already know this.
- 43,104
- 37,244
This post, I even noted in my response post its what you were reported for.
If you read the post making the report in the first place you'd see I am involved. The post I posted above is addressed to me and is involved in the report.
- 32,835
- 38,111
Yeah, I can definitely attest to this, since I've seen some of those revisions at hand having plans for more.
- 31,633
- 34,652
Yeah, I was the one who warned him on the 4-B DC Comics thread, and it seems that he has been extremely problematic and occasionally rude while also expressing ego. I do agree that some action must be taken but what do you propose ArmorChompy?
- 16,171
- 12,705
I don't believe it's my place to make suggestions since I made the report. I don't disagree with a 6 months suggestion personally but again it's not up to me.
- 16,000
- 6,005
This will be my last comment.
It’s very strange that he suggests the SMT CRT (amongst others) only got through because it was a “clusterfuck”. The verse had been dead for upwards of three years, in-spite of the copious amounts of information that went:
It took upwards of a year to fix the entire verse, and a large Harvard essay was made to rectify this, not because we wanted to bypass some user comprehension radar, but because the verse was in a sorry state. This isn’t much different from other verses right now. There are constant DC CRTs to fix YEARS old outdated profiles, all because there’s so much information to delve into.
Some of us don’t have the time or energy to pump out constant feats & blogs every day, and sit and argue over fictional stats. You shouldn’t demean others effort for attempting to make the wiki a more updated place.
It’s very strange that he suggests the SMT CRT (amongst others) only got through because it was a “clusterfuck”. The verse had been dead for upwards of three years, in-spite of the copious amounts of information that went:
- unnoticed
- misinterpreted
- not contextualized
It took upwards of a year to fix the entire verse, and a large Harvard essay was made to rectify this, not because we wanted to bypass some user comprehension radar, but because the verse was in a sorry state. This isn’t much different from other verses right now. There are constant DC CRTs to fix YEARS old outdated profiles, all because there’s so much information to delve into.
Some of us don’t have the time or energy to pump out constant feats & blogs every day, and sit and argue over fictional stats. You shouldn’t demean others effort for attempting to make the wiki a more updated place.
- 31,633
- 34,652
Fair, I think 6 months sounds like a good amount of time, or at least 3. But what do other staff members propose?
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #12,729
Well, since his last ban was for 1 month, 3 months seems like a reasonable escalation, and 6 months seems a bit too harsh, but it depends on what other staff members here think as well.
- 10,066
- 5,309
Due to the previous behavior I've seen from KING, as well as the stunts he has pulled in this current offense, 3 months sounds like a reasonable extension.
He must learn to watch what he says, because without the inflictions of speech, everything he says can be taken out of context and be seen as offensive. Nobody can tell what he's saying is a joke, and he must learn how to express himself without causing friction with people who don't know what his implications are.
He must learn to watch what he says, because without the inflictions of speech, everything he says can be taken out of context and be seen as offensive. Nobody can tell what he's saying is a joke, and he must learn how to express himself without causing friction with people who don't know what his implications are.
- 13,329
- 21,297
sees myself mentioned and quoted in these linked posts
Holy shit it’s me!
I disagree. Given the repeated nature of these things and how he’s been warned for this on top of the already present 1 month ban, a 6 month ban is fair. I’m not opposed to 3 months if that’s what the majority decides, but that’s my take
- 15,554
- 16,173
Wouldn’t him admitting to using scummy tactics to get CRTs accepted warrant something like that?
- 13,329
- 21,297
Okay, yeah I believe so. Admitting that you make long CRT OPs just because people will be less inclined to read through it all and disagree is a scummy move
thetechmaster36
He/Him- 1,831
- 1,752
This user added Immeasurable Speed to Ultradimension Neptune's profile. I've reverted the changes.
- 7,869
- 2,806
Actually, that looks less like an admittance of guilt and more of an accusation that the verses in question have done that
- 31,633
- 34,652
Blocked.
This is the second time they did that despite being warned by Dereck, so a block is in order.
I think 3 months is fine for now.
- 31,633
- 34,652
- 11,386
- 19,974
Thanks.
- 16,171
- 12,705
I think 3 months is fine for king
Jamesthetaker
He/Him- 6,789
- 1,869
This user made a huge abilities change to this profile without any CRT.
He claim to "do it for fun".
He claim to "do it for fun".
- 17,628
- 13,163
i undid the changes but everyone can see the revision history, the person in question should be perma banned
- 11,386
- 19,974
The same user has vandalized the profile again claiming to "do it for fun". I've reverted the edits.
- 31,633
- 34,652
From what I vaguely recall, it was derailing threads and persisted despite multiple warnings and self-admitted to shady tactics to get characters/verses revised.
Yes, I permabanned him. Making giant vandalisms and admitting to do it for fun is definition of blatant vandalism/trolling.
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #12,747
Okay. Are you willing to apply it here and in our wiki?
Thank you for helping out.
- 31,633
- 34,652
Yes, I have done so.
Gewsbumpz_dude
Any/All- 3,659
- 881
I would like to point out that this user applied a CRT that was never accepted.
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,639
- 2,831
@Frieza_force_soldier_100 Please do not apply changes like that even if it may be accepted in the future because they need to be fully accepted beforehand, it sets a bad precedent and only serves to set back our desire to maintain the site's quality if people can just make important changes freely without them being verified or validated.
This is a warning.
This is a warning.
Last edited:
- 168,514
- 77,231
- Thread starter
- #12,752
I agree with the warning.
So should we undo the following revision then?
vsbattles.fandom.com
So should we undo the following revision then?
King Jellyjam (Goosebumps)
King Jellyjam was the main antagonist of the thirty-third Goosebumps book, The Horror at Camp Jellyjam. While not discussed in the original book, a bonus feature at the end of the Classic Goosebumps reprint says that King Jellyjam was accidentally created when a camper left a cup of gelatin in a...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 4,451
- 1,950
Yeah, the changes weren't accepted yet and Agnaa brought up a new point and proposal that seems like it's going to go through. So, for now, that should be removed.I agree with the warning.
So should we undo the following revision then?
King Jellyjam (Goosebumps)
King Jellyjam was the main antagonist of the thirty-third Goosebumps book, The Horror at Camp Jellyjam. While not discussed in the original book, a bonus feature at the end of the Classic Goosebumps reprint says that King Jellyjam was accidentally created when a camper left a cup of gelatin in a...
- 10,758
- 6,491
Just a notification that this user used a slur
I will post the screenshot when I have access to Imgur
I have given him a warning, but notifying it here for future reference
I will post the screenshot when I have access to Imgur
I have given him a warning, but notifying it here for future reference
- 15,554
- 16,173
I’ll just add that they said this after being warned.
- 15,591
- 22,892
A perma ban is warranted I suppose.
- 11,730
- 11,082
I don't think a permaban is necessary for a one-time offense, especially considering it wasn't used in a derogatory manner. And I think that statement afterward may be sarcasm or a joke, obviously, that doesn't excuse it, but I don't think it's permaban worthy.
Edit: NO WHY IS THIS MY 5,000th MESSAGE.
Edit: NO WHY IS THIS MY 5,000th MESSAGE.
- 15,591
- 22,892
Nevermind then, thought that was how we went about slurs. How long do you propose?
- 3,128
- 1,714
Might help if what was said could be posted/clarified. Can't find it myself.
- 10,758
- 6,491
I can't log in to Imgur. Mav has a screenshot though
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Featured
- Locked
