-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 3,120
- 1,693
I'm just gonna say 6 months. The fact that they later claimmed they don't care has me thinking they need something that'll stick or sting.
Perma if they do something else.
Perma if they do something else.
- 15,339
- 22,148
Slurs of any kind in any context are an insta-ban afaik
- 10,758
- 6,491
I'm fine with a warning btw
- 10,758
- 6,491
In Fandom's eyes. This forum doesn't need to be as strict and ignore all context
- 15,339
- 22,148
In a similar situation that occurred fairly recent I was told the exact opposite, and that we have a precedent for considering slurs ban worthy regardless of severity.
Not that I agree with Fandom's strictness but if we have a precendent it's only fair to stick to it.
- 11,556
- 10,673
I disagree with this notion. Obviously, context should matter when judging the situation. I am not sure how anyone could argue otherwise.
- 10,758
- 6,491
If there's disagreement with the staff themselves we will probably have to work it out somewhere else. The report thread is not the place for deciding the standards
- 10,758
- 6,491
If there's an official standard written down somewhere I will be willing to implement that
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
Apologies for interrupting, but I think this post was advocating for just a ban without specified timings, rather than a permanent ban so the precedent doesn’t suggest permanent ban w/out context, just a ban w/out context, with context deciding on the specifics of timings
at least that’s what I gathered from the message at the time
- 15,339
- 22,148
Yeah, I already agreed that permanent is too much. Now we're discussing if it's ban worthy or just a warning.
- 9,629
- 8,663
How's this even ban worthy? This term is used to refer to a group of people or fans of any franchise, not an actual slur per se.
And he is not even insulting anyone. He should get warning to not use it as it can be interpreted as an insult against some people.
Last edited:
- 15,411
- 15,766
He did get a warning, and proceeded to reply to said warning with this. That would warrant more, wouldn’t it?
- 3,120
- 1,693
The last half of that word is a derogetory term for Homosexuality.
Last edited:
- 9,488
- 10,851
Sorry for butting in, but that suffix/slang literally originates from tripcodes/oldschool imageboards where people constantly call eachothers slurs all the time. I fail to see how this isn't derogatory or homophobic.
- 9,629
- 8,663
I know that pretty well, but the term has been bastardized so much is used like I stated previously, especially if it's after x group or franchise.
That's why I doubt @UltimateDarkGod666 was trying to use it that way.
- 9,629
- 8,663
I think he was joking, and should be allowed to defend himself or apologize is he was indeed trolling (which would be hypocritical with his previous comment).
Last edited:
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,998
This user vandalized Killua's page. I've reverted the edits
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,998
- 11,250
- 19,727
I've reverted the edits from Gon's profile as well, tho imo it doesn't seems vandalism but an inexperienced user, I think instructions and warning would be fine.
- 11,250
- 19,727
Well, it seems that Ant already gave him instructions previously and he still, so i think he should be banned
GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,998
The dude is vandalizing Kurapika's page even after Dereck reverted the edits.
- 19,151
- 6,446
Blocked.
Another staff can change the length of their ban if they decide to.
Another staff can change the length of their ban if they decide to.
- 167,680
- 76,259
- Thread starter
- #12,786
Thank you. However, he seemed to be a clueless newbie who did not mean any harm, going by the nature of his edits, so I think that a 3 months block should probably be enough.
Last edited:
- 167,680
- 76,259
- Thread starter
- #12,787
Since he did not seem to use the f-word as a slur towards a specific person or sexual identity, but rather as generalised rude slang, I suppose that we should take the context into account, but he also seemed rather rude and unreasonable in general in the OPM discussion thread, and opposed Andytrenom's official staff reprimand, so I suppose that a month long warning block is probably a good idea at least.
- 15,339
- 22,148
That solution sounds fine to me.
- 167,680
- 76,259
- Thread starter
- #12,789
Okay. Would you be willing to handle the issue, @Andytrenom ?
Also, what about this, @Celestial_Pegasus ?
- 19,151
- 6,446
3 months is fine with me.
- 10,758
- 6,491
Alright
- 10,758
- 6,491
I suppose I should ban him in the wiki too?
- 167,680
- 76,259
- Thread starter
- #12,795
Yes, that is best. Thank you for helping out.
- 31,372
- 34,119
That's not really block worthy offense, but it's a dick move to spoil a big movie/game/series before it's released to the public. I would remove some posts if one can send me links to post(s) in question.
- 8,177
- 1,376
Well I was asking if I can block someone. Like not see their posts and stuff
Similar threads
