Rule Revision Regarding Banned Users and Proxies.

[Mr. Bambu]

Yes but as anyone who has done data management can tell you, getting the opinions of larger group of people lessens the overall bias regardless of what type of group it is. The staff are human after all, personal bias is a given. There would be a point where we would indeed have to trust imperfectly trust people but we have not that reached that point as of yet.



That could work but has issues of it rather slow or just never resolving like a CRT can. Through my nigh 6 years of the wiki I have seen the personal biases of many users on this sight influence their own choices which has happened to regular and staff users alike. I am capable naming examples but I am not sure if this thread is the right place for that.


I am again willing to reduce it to 3 staff approvals. I personally never had an issue getting over 3 before in my own CRT threads but that is at the end of the day my own perspective. 3 would have to be the minimum however any lower and the risks stated above take affect.


I see, Method 1 can be easily rewritten to do this as it also is about strictly banning proxying as a whole. So it would only require some changes before fulfilling your ideal scenario.

The philosophy of data management applies to very large groups of people, we don't have the luxury of dealing with those.

It probably isn't, but I don't doubt it.

Respectfully, I'm not willing to have it be 3. 2 is fine if we keep the rule as you present it in that option.

Correct. Method One is flawed currently but would match that ideal with some tweaking.