Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Agnaa]

I find these new segments quoted by Bambu less rule-violatey than the parts quoted by Grath in the last report. And even those I struggle to consider a violation (closest I get would be "you know damn well what they mean, let's not pretend otherwise" for alleging the other interlocutor is deliberately lying, and "Because of people like you apparently" for making stat disagreement a personal matter). The hypocrisy is lame, but doesn't make it a violation imo.

In general, I don't view calling an argument bad (as calling something a strawman is), to be an insult or a particularly concerning allegation. I don't want to chill the ability of users to engage with arguments.

 

[GarrixianXD]

Reporting @Ped2018's behaviour here:

https://vsbattles.com/threads/devil-may-cry-a-lore-revision.175933/post-6945812

 

[Agnaa]

Reporting @Ped2018's behaviour here:

https://vsbattles.com/threads/devil-may-cry-a-lore-revision.175933/post-6945812

I, personally, saw those posts as a mild infraction. Not one that I really care about, so I was happy to leave it with just Glassman's informal warning.

But I understand if others want to do something more.

 

[Dereck03]

The most I could see was bit of tantrum on Ped's part, so I'm fine with Glassman's informal warning.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Reporting @Ped2018's behaviour here:

https://vsbattles.com/threads/devil-may-cry-a-lore-revision.175933/post-6945812

That's absolutely worthy of a warning. It's literally three responses of just the middle finger emote in a row.

 

[Ped2018]

It was two, actually, i deleted the quoted one because it seemed too personal and then made the "third one".

 

[Mr. Bambu]

It was two, actually, i deleted the quoted one because it seemed too personal and then made the "third one".

That's still three, but duly noted. Still worthy of a formal warning, can't exactly be allowing that to supplant discussion.