Bro why my thread get closed??
I not using agreement of staff, i just ask him about ability, when i ask him i not even include verse or anything i just ask him about the ability, so why i must give context when i not ask about verse???
I not using agreement of staff, i just ask him about ability, when i ask him i not even include verse or anything i just ask him about the ability, so why i must give context when i not ask about verse???

We do have this statement.
“
•Avalon: The Everdistant Utopia
The matching “scabbard” of the holy sword Excalibur. The wielder does not age, and injuries will also quickly heal.
After invoking its true name, Avalon dissipates as tiny particles into the air, and shields the wielder from all interference. No damage can be done to the wielder when a state of absolute defence is initiated. Even interference from the parallel world based on the Second Magic will be blocked. An “absolute defence” that can even repel the assault of True Magic, it is a True Magic in itself. No one can harm the tranquil King that stands in the land of Avalon.
When Avalon was unleashed, not even the King of Heroes could harm Saber.”
As this is backed up by the feat of Avalon blocking Ea at what seems to being at full power.
There is no reason for Gil to explicitly hold back against Saber when she deployed Excalibur against Ea.