• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

Well that's cause all the GOW fans are apart of a single collective group while there's still some here that aren't for Dbz and will go rouge cause they have there own thoughts
I am my own being!

darth-vader-rebels.gif
 
A brand new account came to my blog to drop some wonderful feedback ("DB caps at multi🤓")

IMG_7232.jpg


Sigh... I wake up this morning and spend hours dealing with a debunk from the Q&A threads, and at this point, I need to update my blogs in response to at least 1 other debunk I've received already off-site. At the very least, I'll have loads of entertainment in the coming days/weeks.
 
A brand new account came to my blog to drop some wonderful feedback ("DB caps at multi🤓")

IMG_7232.jpg


Sigh... I wake up this morning and spend hours dealing with a debunk from the Q&A threads, and at this point, I need to update my blogs in response to at least 1 other debunk I've received already off-site. At the very least, I'll have loads of entertainment in the coming days/weeks.
Hey we are gonna make bulletproof low 1-C. Also Prof your profile is doing stuff to me...Also also 3k posts. What a waste of time.
 
A brand new account came to my blog to drop some wonderful feedback ("DB caps at multi🤓")

IMG_7232.jpg


Sigh... I wake up this morning and spend hours dealing with a debunk from the Q&A threads, and at this point, I need to update my blogs in response to at least 1 other debunk I've received already off-site. At the very least, I'll have loads of entertainment in the coming days/weeks.
Low 1-C DB has a passive aura of "shit got serious"
 
Jaekor raised an interesting point in the Zamasu upgrade thread. Why would Future Zeno erase the entire timeline if that also means erasing the Grand Priest and the angels? Even in the manga, Grand Priest prepares to withdraw the Angels before Zeno could start erasing the lower 8 universes. There is the argument that maybe the Angel Realm (Or Zeno Realm) is outside of the Hypertimeline but that doesn't really work since Time Travel also duplicates Zeno and the Angels.

Either Zeno just erased the timeline because the Grand Priest wasn't there to reason with him or Zamasu really was merged with the timeline itself. It's very OOC for him to erase Angels along with an entire timeline.
 
i'm pretty sure because he was ticked off
We've heard of him getting angry before and he limited the destruction to six universes. And we don't really know if that included the angels for those universes as the surviving angels could just be in the Angel Realm.

I don't know. Just seems hard to believe that he'd erase the Grand Priest, every Angel and his attendants when he could have just erased Universe 7 and moved on with his life. Even in the context of the ToP, him erasing 'everything' (if a selfish wish were made) was in regards to the macrocosms. Not the Angels or Grand Priest.
 
A brand new account came to my blog to drop some wonderful feedback ("DB caps at multi🤓")

IMG_7232.jpg


Sigh... I wake up this morning and spend hours dealing with a debunk from the Q&A threads, and at this point, I need to update my blogs in response to at least 1 other debunk I've received already off-site. At the very least, I'll have loads of entertainment in the coming days/weeks.
There's no point to entertaining this if it's not in a CRT
 
Jaekor raised an interesting point in the Zamasu upgrade thread. Why would Future Zeno erase the entire timeline if that also means erasing the Grand Priest and the angels? Even in the manga, Grand Priest prepares to withdraw the Angels before Zeno could start erasing the lower 8 universes. There is the argument that maybe the Angel Realm (Or Zeno Realm) is outside of the Hypertimeline but that doesn't really work since Time Travel also duplicates Zeno and the Angels.

Either Zeno just erased the timeline because the Grand Priest wasn't there to reason with him or Zamasu really was merged with the timeline itself. It's very OOC for him to erase Angels along with an entire timeline.
I actually think they didn't think that far....
 
But then the Dragonball page seems to fit more with what happened and with the manga https://en.dragon-ball-official.com/news/01_900.html
What happens in the manga means jack all when discussing what happened in the anime.
Erase is depicted as a blast that actively consumes Infinite Zamasu beginning from Zen-Oh, and the Time Ring disappears.
Never in the anime.
Also the universe is used to mean the cosmos sometimes. Pretty clear cut case of bad wording.
You're right, my bad.
The exact dialogue is "宇宙ごと", or "uchū-goto", which means "every universe".
 
30th anniversary timeline includes Goku and Chi-Chi's wedding adventure, the Garlic Jr. Saga, Vegeta's Super Saiyan training in the Gravity Machine, Goku and Piccolo's driving test, and Goku meeting Grand Kai and participating in the Other World Tournament among manga chronology.
 
Oh! That means you'll have seen:
 
A brand new account came to my blog to drop some wonderful feedback ("DB caps at multi🤓")

IMG_7232.jpg


Sigh... I wake up this morning and spend hours dealing with a debunk from the Q&A threads, and at this point, I need to update my blogs in response to at least 1 other debunk I've received already off-site. At the very least, I'll have loads of entertainment in the coming days/weeks.

I disagree

I disagree
 
Back
Top