This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Does resisting Conceptual Attack grant Conceptual Manipulation resistance?
Say, a Character A claim his Flame is conceptual in nature (for the sake of the question, we accept it at face value) and character B unaffected by this conceptual Flame.
Do character B got conceptual manipulation...
I would like to know, how the wiki treats characters who are conceptual, perfect and immutable beings. More specifically if a work works with the house of ideas. Is there any difference between a conceptual being of this caliber and others?
According to Akita Toriyama a question ki is a concept, would that give conceptual manipulation to ki users or something like that?
Where does he quote
Source: https://www.kanzenshuu.com/translations/seg-story-volume-truth-about-dragon-ball/
If accepted, I want it to be added as conceptual...
so, I have two question
question 1
there's verse A that has causality and conceptual causality user, it's explained that conceptual causality user will always be better than normal causality user
then there's this verse B, there's mention of causality user, but there's no mention of...
If you have an attack which is stated to attack on a conceptual level and it has 0 feats, do you just assume it can kill a human with no resistance to conceptual manipulation because you would bypass durability
Sup. I wasn't on this wiki for like 2 years so idk if things got changed or not so I have few questions
Type 2 Acausality vs Precognition: If you have Type 2 acausality and you'll fight against someone with Precognition, what do they see when they see? Say you're gonna kill them in this fight...
Hello, I would like to ask some questions related to conceptual manipulation.
1- Erasing someone conceptually, fits what kind of concept (ex: type 1,2,3)
2- If a character who has the ability to erase a type 1 concept, would he also have the ability to erase someone conceptually? Or will it...
Basically, if a character can manipulate the concept of something that is already accepted as a concept, would we even accept that? Would it grant a higher degree of CM, or something else?
Hello, the question below:
1. What type of concept is the concept of one's identity (Individual Existence)? Is it type 2 or 3?
2. What type of concept is the concept of Fate and Law?
3. For example, "Character A has a conceptual system embedded into their existence. This system is stated in...
Character B transcends all laws and concepts of the world, including concept of existence and non existence, and causality. Character A has a power that strips character B of this transcendence and forces him to obey the laws and concepts of the world. What iz this power of character A?
Just want to add more ability for order
Order is meta-fate and providence of the world. Also order see the whole world just as theater performance, every phenomenom and event in the world is control by order, when event is end and disappear order will create the new and keep the world in...
Is it possible to get immunity to conceptual manipulation in a similar fashion to immunity to soul manip.
To have immunity to soul manip the character has to lack a soul, in this case the character lacks the concept that makes up their very existence.
Is that enough to qualify?
Type 1 Conceptual Manipulation is defined as:
However, it includes two different definitions, which would imply different things for series that involve this type.
The first definition is "Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern." It requires that these...
So we start with fire dew.
Fire dew is the fundamental principle of order, and the order of silver sea it self. So because order is concept and law, fire dew should also concept and law but in deeper level, because it is fundamental of order. More proof fire dew is concept, fire dew is...
So here's an idea.
Character A is capable of manipulating the type 1 concept of time/causality/whatnot.
Would this be enough to interact with a type 5 acausal? As far as I can see, the reason why we don't treat type 1 conceptual manipulation as bypassing type 5 acausality is due to the way the...
So, I have a question here.
1. Can 'AE type 1 of Type 2 Concept' be affected by Information Manipulation Type 2?
2. Can 'AE type 1 of Type 2 Information' be affected by Plot Manipulation?
3. Can 'AE type 1 of the Plot' be affected by Conceptual Manipulation Type 2?
This condition is where the...
Because I recently finished upgrading character to get transdual. I thought some questions about it
1. If Transduality 2 transcended all duality, its mean it would have acausality type 5 and NEP nature type 2 in it??
2. Is Transduality 2 have immunity to all fundamental aspect of reality...
If a character removed a concept from a space, everything in that space that abides by that concept would be destroyed, since the concept doesn't exist. would a character unaffected by the destruction of the concept, be above the concept itself?
I'm planning on making a crt so I wanted to ask:
Existing before existence, creating the systems/laws/concepts that shape your reality and being conceptless.
What powers/abilities/resistances would this give?
Like the title of this thread i got some weird and probably dumb question
Okay, so character A has conceptual level life manipulation and it's capable of making armies with said ability, while character B is capable of killing said army with its death manipulation and it is capable of doing so...
If in a verse every existing being has souls, including abstract beings of type 1 concepts, does that mean that souls are also a type 1 concept?
And if this is correct, would manipulating souls in this verse be considered conceptual manipulation as well?
Haven't read type 3 concept section for a long time so there are old changes that I'm not aware of
1. Why regenerating from destruction of type 3 concept is not high godly regeneration?Personal concept is still something that makes up and governs one existence, so it should be fundamental...
It's about cm 1
If there is a Conceptual manipulation type 1 independent concept vs Conceptual manipuation type 1 transcendent concept
Which one is supperior? Or it just same thing?
And i have ever heard that cm 1 transcendent one can interact with acausality type 5, is that true?
I've seen many people claim that concept manip doesn't work on those with high-godly regen. However, it should still kill them, no? Since it can kill them (and they come back from it of course), doesn't that mean that they don't resist concept manipulation? Wouldn't it be possible for the person...
Hello, I would like to ask a question regarding CM type 1 and possible powernull
1. How does a character qualified for getting CM type 1 and what feats do they need to demonstrate in order to get that?
2. If character A is 3D with 5D smurf hax while character B is 5D being that capable of...
rather a simple one
They are basically wedges that define concepts and gave birth to them
for example, they define what makes fire fire and what makes it different from water, a deeper example is they define what are the difference between life and death thus these concepts can exist, a more...
Hello All,
The topic of this discussion is in regards to how we treat conceptual manipulation and is sort of stemming from the current JjK hax revisions thread, and this incomplete thread discussing some of the concepts I am touching upon today.
Essentially, we don't really have an avenue...
If a character/or object are said to created everything in existance (myths, creatures, stories, science, technology, and human civilization, etc) does it mean said character/or object predates creation? If so, what level of Conceptual Manipulation would it be?
I still can't really understand transduality, duality, kinds of entities like Nep 2 , conceptual manipulation, conceptual types, causal systems,Why can space and time be called duality?Why is time also a concept? Is space also a concept? The concept of time is included in what type of...
I lied, this won't be simple at all, rather I expect it to be pretty controversial.
Essentially, I'm proposing that Yhwach gets one of the following;
Possibly Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2)
Something else that might be suggested in the comments
The reasoning itself is rather simple really...