1-A questions

[Vyfourthaccount]

1st: How do platonism 1-A scaling works in general? Does it vary widely in tiers depending on the concept? Plus is it still applicable for 1-A in vsbattle?

2nd: is set theory stuff still applicable for 1-A?

3rd: and how does beyond dimensional 1-A stuff works now?

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

Forgot the categories hold on

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

I can't delete my own threads sigh

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Do you want this deleted, or do you want categories added?

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

Do you want this deleted, or do you want categories added?

Categories pls

 

[Mr. Bambu]

You'll have to specify which ones.

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

You'll have to specify which ones.

Ehh beyond dimensional, platonic Concepts, outerversal and set theory

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

bump

 

[Phoenks]

How do platonism 1-A scaling works in general? Does it vary widely in tiers depending on the concept? Plus is it still applicable for 1-A in vsbattle?

Plato's forms, if followed sufficiently, would be 1-A (At the very least), since they exist in a higher reality as perfect, eternal, and unchanging archetypes beyond space and time that our (lower) reality is just an imitation of.

A series just having platonic concepts/forms doesn't make it 1-A though. Requires further context and still must abide by tiering standards.

The Form of Good on the other hand would be Tier 0 if properly depicted, since it illuminates all other forms (qualities) in the world. Essentially acting as the ultimate reason behind everything.

2nd: is set theory stuff still applicable for 1-A?

Conventional Set Theory ends at Low 1-A.

3rd: and how does beyond dimensional 1-A stuff works now?

I would recommend reading the tiering system pages that explain it.

1-A is basically when something exceeds the compositional makeup of the prior tiers. Something that can't be reached by stacking any degree of lower existence upon itself.


So like you can multiply spatial objects infinitely to reach into higher and higher dimensions, that sorta thing would never allow you to reach a 1-A being since they are utterly beyond spatial composition. To the point that it might as well be fictitious/nonexistent to them.

 

[Vyfourthaccount]

Plato's forms, if followed sufficiently, would be 1-A (At the very least), since they exist in a higher reality as perfect, eternal, and unchanging archetypes beyond space and time that our (lower) reality is just an imitation of.

A series just having platonic concepts/forms doesn't make it 1-A though. Requires further context and still must abide by tiering standards.

The Form of Good on the other hand would be Tier 0 if properly depicted, since it illuminates all other forms (qualities) in the world. Essentially acting as the ultimate reason behind everything.




Conventional Set Theory ends at Low 1-A.



I would recommend reading the tiering system pages that explain it.

1-A is basically when something exceeds the compositional makeup of the prior tiers. Something that can't be reached by stacking any degree of lower existence upon itself.


So like you can multiply spatial objects infinitely to reach into higher and higher dimensions, that sorta thing would never allow you to reach a 1-A being since they are utterly beyond spatial composition. To the point that it might as well be fictitious/nonexistent to them.

Ohhh now I understand!, thank you tho

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

.
The Form of Good on the other hand would be Tier 0 if properly depicted, since it illuminates all other forms (qualities) in the world. Essentially acting as the ultimate reason behind everything.

The surprise never stop coming new hop of tier 0 . tbh cant imagine a verse making it to tier 0 with the form of good because they would need perfect platonic .