- 36
- 10
If we establish a collection of concepts as universal truths/objectives, these concepts have the following nature:
Now, if we remove a concept from a single worldview, does it qualify as type 1?
What about several worldviews or more than one/wider interpretation?
Is it possible to destroy all variations of a concept, including inert ones, in the truest sense? so one layer above?
What about destroying unmanifested concepts? 2 layer?
If we have a character that abolishes the entire "conceptual settings" mentioned above, how many layers would there be?
- They must influence one or more worldviews/realities, depending on their interpretation.
- Each interpretation is working on a fundamentally different framework.
- In a narrow interpretation, we cannot expand or extrapolate beyond what is defined. For example, the concept of chaos has several interpretations.
- One worldview describes chaos as the disorder and uncertainty in quantum states—no more, no less.
- Chaos as an all-encompassing primordial essence that constitutes other concepts and realities.
- The second worldview can replicate the first interpretation, but we cannot expand the first one unless we modify it first.
- Unmanifested concepts are stateless and eternal.
- Concepts that we can interpret but don't influence reality are described as "inert concepts."
- Destroying concepts just pushes them into the "inert concept" category.
Now, if we remove a concept from a single worldview, does it qualify as type 1?
What about several worldviews or more than one/wider interpretation?
Is it possible to destroy all variations of a concept, including inert ones, in the truest sense? so one layer above?
What about destroying unmanifested concepts? 2 layer?
If we have a character that abolishes the entire "conceptual settings" mentioned above, how many layers would there be?
