That's completely false. This had nothing to do with any separation of the manga and film. I don't where you go that from. These are the raw translations if you
Yess it does, the literal post your linked me is about an original story set between chapter 699 and 700 the "movie version" of Hinata and Naruto's love that wasn't in the original story. theres literally nothing about the novel in any of these
need it.
It's merely talking about Kishi adding stuffs that wasn't in the novel.
no it doesnt, it just says he made them rewrite the initial script dozens of times not that he added stuff after the fact while the film was in production
If you read the novel, tell me if you would find anywhere Where Toneri absorbed Naruto's chakra after their battle. Or tell me anywhere Hinata gave Naruto chakra after his battle with Toneri. YOu would never find it because that was an extra addition Kishi made in the movie. Movie events are different from what the novel
you dont know what he did or didnt add lmao, if you actually followed the film's production then you will know the director and screenwriter also made changes to the story , the entire subplot with Naruto's scarf didnt come from kishimotto. he just agreed to it. The novel is literally written by the same person who wrote the movie, having slight differences doesnt make it non canon, in the same way the anime of boruto having differences from the manga doesnt make it non canon. the only difference is that when contradictions happen you take the source thats higher on the priority list. the issue is there is no contradiction. it's canon deal with it.
wrote.
How's that irrelevant?
Dude. If you know how the green orb works, then it's basic comprehension to understand that anybody that gets in contact with that orb is never at full power immediately after. Does it have to be directly stated for you to know that? I bet you're one of those people who complained that Hinata was unable to walk on the wall without understanding why she couldn't do that.
Because the actual writer for the movie disagrees with you lmao. also no thats not how those orbs work
1. The First Orb made Hinata numb so that they could carry her away which is why she still feels the effects later when she tries walk on the wall, less than a minute later she recovers fine.
2. The Second Orb was used to control her so that she could fight Naruto.
The first and second orb have nothing to do with one another, saying that effects would be the same is headcanon and unlike the first orb, Naruto actually destroys the second one inside hinata,so even assuming the effect duration would be the same as the first is also headcanon.
and Finally they don't immediately destroy the Tenseigan after Naruto saves Hinata lol,theres a scene that inter cuts before we skip ahead (so we have no idea how long it could be) the very fact that Hintata can infuse Hagoromo's chakra with one of her strongest versions of the Gentle fist tells us her chakra control is perfectly fine. saying otherwise is headcanon
Once again, Naruto was extremely fatigued at that moment because he just finished tanking a whole ass bijuudama from Momoshiki. THink about it, if he wasn't weakened, you really think he would have allowed Momoshiki and Kinshiki to take him out of the village?
Naruto wasnt weakened he was knocked out completely, comparing a knocked out Naruto with one thats awake is ridiculous
THe 50% still in Naruto is irrelevant at that moment because Naruto was still physically fatigued.
he wasnt because he can clearly physically fight.
Stop bringing in Momoshiki's scenario by comparing it to Toneri's. THey are completely different circumstances and absorption powers.
the same naruto and the same chakra pool
How's that irrelevant? Toneri absorbed only half of Kurama in Naruto. THe other half was fighting the Hamura golem.
Because Naruto doesnt just have Kurama's chakra inside him. are we going to ignore that naruto has six paths chakra?
Toneri on the other hand absorbed all of Naruto's half Kurama chakra available, leaving Naruto with nothing. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend?
Naruto doesnt just have Kurama's chakra
Stop strawmanning my arguments. I never said Naruto could not break the shinju tree because his chakra was getting extracted. I said he was unable to break the tree because he was still fatigued from the bijuudama he tanked earlier in the village.
this is the same Naruto that can Physically dominate momoshiki.
Except from the fact Naruto was still kneeling down and severely weakened after Toneri stopped absorbing his chakra implying that his chakra was depleted. Seriously, what are you trying to argue here? Are you saying TOneri didn't absorb all of his chakra? I showed you a scan specifically stating that Naruto was getting ALL OF HIS CHAKRA ABSORBED. And seconds later, Toneri finished the job. All you're doing is prolonging this unnecessarily by bringing in half-assed arguments via Momoshiki who has a completely different absorption ability and needed to absorb way more chakra than Toneri needed to.
the fact that you keep bringing up Momoshiki absorbing more chakra while also missing my point. the fact that Naruto had access to more chakra and is physically strong enough to fight and react to people like Fused Momoshiki means that Naruto doesnt require his chakra to be absorbed entirely to be fatigued. because the act itself puts strain on. arguing that he tanked a Bijuu dama is irrelevant because that would only apply to the Naruto that is not awake, not the Naruto that's awake but tied to the tree. we know this because an even weaker Naruto both physically and with chakra reserves has better feats, The Person who one shotted Momoshiki, not only tanked a bijuu dama, had his chakra reserves absorbed for hours , then engaged in a battle where he had to use his kurama avatar, followed by getting his body turned into a kabob via momoshiki's rods. this is the naruto that can one shot momo. and you want me to believe an earlier, physically better and with more chakra reserves wouldnt be able to break the tree that fused momoshiki destroyed with his voice alone?
3. THe official novelization is not only held lesser than the movie in terms of canonicity, but it also had zero involvement from Kishimoto unlike the movie where Kishimoto edited in several new concepts.
Kishi didnt write the script, he supervised and gave ideas and feedback, he approved of the script, and the person who wrote the script wrote the novel so by extension the novel would be using content supervised by kishimotto. the omission of information isnt contradictory it just means the movie has content thats not in the novel, and no matter how much you want to die on this hill, the omission has nothing to do with an entirely separate event earlier in the movie that debunks your headcanon.