Mentioning it here as to not derail the thread:
What Deagon is questioning is a standards thing, not a verse thing. If a verse has "multiple realities", would it truly be Type 1 concepts. He is unsure on the standards there, as the pages are admittedly kinda ambivalent about it. That's why he's asking the experts about it.
What Deagon is questioning is a standards thing, not a verse thing. If a verse has "multiple realities", would it truly be Type 1 concepts. He is unsure on the standards there, as the pages are admittedly kinda ambivalent about it. That's why he's asking the experts about it.