• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

I'm doing this again: Fire Dragon vs Dragon of Wrath

Yeah, that's my first time hearing people say it was mistranslation. What was the original wording? Cause I'm pretty sure people pulled up Manga scans with it saying the same thing.
 
I remember the conversation an someone brought up manga scans and the hell word wasn't there.
 
Malikobama brought up the fact that unless it can be proven, there's literally 0 reason to take Atlas' comment at face value even if it wasn't a mistranslation.

Because at the end of the day, he can call it whatever he wants, but the contested point is that Zancrow's flame is not like a normal fire. Neither is Hellblaze. If it's just flames with a cool name and no actual difference, how does that have any relevance and stop Natsu from eating them like normal?

THAT is a False Equivalence because both have Hell in their name.
 
LSirLancelotDuLacl said:
Malikobama brought up the fact that unless it can be proven, there's literally 0 reason to take Atlas' comment at face value even if it wasn't a mistranslation.
Because at the end of the day, he can call it whatever he wants, but the contested point is that Zancrow's flame is not like a normal fire. Neither is Hellblaze. If it's just flames with a cool name and no actual difference, how does that have any relevance and stop Natsu from eating them like normal?

THAT is a False Equivalence because both have Hell in their name.
That is a false equivalence becasue both have hell in their name?

You are continuously imagine that natsu cant absrob mel hellfire becasue it black as zancriw flame.
 
From the 1st chapter, so we are going to ignore it?
20181003 175901 rmedited
If you can prove that Natsu cant eat hellfire with valid logic or a demon flame has divine power like god flame then Mel take Mel

Otherwise

  • Natsu is immune to flame
  • can't be hurt by his own flame
  • static amplification
  • enhance sense to predict an opponent move
  • FC type attack is not new for me
  • can use his flame in different way(like using it behing his hand to enhance his physical state)
 
Natsu could eat Atlas who's flames burn magic, there's no difference between them and hellfire. He did it with no difficulty too.
 
He first used in-story wise the ability when he got liz sword, which was during the fight with dale.

He in a flashback used it with the dragon handle some 10ish years ago while being unsealed to wound ban

It should still be viable for him to use it, seeing that random red demons have access to it and when he first used it against dale he was still sealed and we know he can channel it through the dragon handle from the flashback when he was unsealed.

Done while being sealed and armed with a random weapon -> yes Done with the dragon handle while being unsealed -> yes Ergo: doing it with the dragon handle while being sealed -> yes Additional intel: inferior red demons do it too without any weapon or incantation
 
Hasn't he only used it twice sealed, out of the many fights he has had in this form? There's like a 20% or even less chance he'll use it.
 
We don't count how many times a character has used anabaility on relation to how many fights he has been in only to determine whether or not he would use it. Not when it's a regular bread and butter ability that is - exceptions of course are always a possibility.

As for meliodas, it was his very first move once he got Liz sword back and during the entire fight with Hendrickson/gilthunder/Vivian he worked for a moment for when he could use it most perfectly for the maximum of result.

It's a perfectly IC move set for meliodas.
 
Even without Liz's sword?

You're adressing that he did it once he got the sword but this Meliodas doesn't have it.
 
I have explained why meliodas being able to use hellfire while being sealed and with just the dragon handle is a logical conclusion just some posts above.

He has done it while being sealed and with Liz sword He has done it while being unsealed with the dragon handle -> he can do it both, channeling through the dragon handle and having enough power to do it while being sealed
 
But we're talking about his in character likeliness to use hellfire during the dragon handle sealed form. What he did with Liz's sword doesn't apply.
 
Meliodas probably wouldn't use it on someone obviously (obvious due to Natsu coating himself in fire all the time) fire resistant like Natsu.


Any way, Meliodas FRA and the fact that Natsu doesn't seem to have very much stamina in this form.
 
Delta3000 said:
Meliodas probably wouldn't use it on someone obviously (obvious due to Natsu coating himself in fire all the time) fire resistant like Natsu.


Any way, Meliodas FRA and the fact that Natsu doesn't seem to have very much stamina in this form.
There is no reason above
 
@dragon emperour23.

Well when he fought Mard he ran out of magic about 5 seconds after activating his dragon force. additionally none of his powered up forms seem to last very long any way.
 
Back
Top