-
Propellus CloverDragon03 Propellus wrote on CloverDragon03's profile.
Can you check this calc out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reading the OP, means reading all the proposed evidence, I know that there are many staffs who simply agree sometimes just skim reading, but I am not one of them as I take my evaluation role very seriously and it shows in the amount of people daily asking for my evaluation. It is not an evasive answer as for me, my answer was very concrete, and I myself clarified having read the blog in this thread, same information + scans. I hope this clarifies that I did read everything that was proposed.This was after having been repeatedly questioned on whether you had read the blog, giving an evasive answer each time. Being directly asked on how much of the evidence you had read, including whether you had read the blog, and stating the clear list of what you had read (without the blog being included in your list) is an admission that, at that point in time, you had not read the blog. The actively evasive phrasing does not change this fact.
Here I do not agree, I am not perfect, but when you have those 2 questioning the validation of my votes every time is annoying, I gave many advices to stop, because not only to me, but to the votes of maverick and dalesan. And maybe you know this but I used to be just a Content Moderator and even then I was asked for a lot of evaluations on a daily basis and I did it and still had too many people questioning and invalidating my vote until I hit rock bottom here and decided to stop giving evaluations, so I get a thorn every time someone tries to invalidate my vote with nonsense excuses and obviously I will never insult them or anything, I will simply ask them to stop because it is annoying.I believe it is a necessity for our wiki to function to its best capacity that staff members with evaluation rights give content revision threads adequate consideration, and I do not believe adequacy was demonstrated here.
What that scaling mechanics is? What would make it so different? Just out of curiosity, really. Im not gonna debate about One PieceIdk why you guys love to bring up other verses and then be completely wrong about their damn scaling mechanics. It's embarassing atp. Just stick with 1 verse
The main purpose of this forum is to discuss how to properly index the statistics of characters from a wide variety of different fictional franchises.