- 11,055
- 19,445
Pain... you're actively stonewalling the conversation through repeating the same debunked points over and over again to ad nauseam, the scans you've provided don't inherently prove your claim, in actuality, these scans in specific disprove your claim about one of the pillars perceiving the world 250 years ago in a manga style, because she directly doesn't. She literally says "250 years ago.... a world that looked differently than ours does now", with the literal next panel showing her having the "real world" style during that period in time rather than her previous manga style she currently has. This two exact panels actively contradict your interpretations...
No one disagrees with the fact that because of people's unconscious thoughts and perceptions that the world changed from a "real world" art style to a "manga" one. That doesn't prove nor disprove anything, it's useless conjecture. Also those aren't "direct statements", I've thoroughly explained why they have multiple valid interpretations in my previous post. So i'm not going to continually address evidence which I've already addressed previously, especially when said evidence isn't argued for with any conviction.
It doesn't need to say that because the statement doesn't have only one valid interpretation, it has multiple valid interpretations. Which I've provided and explained a plethora of times already. This constant appeal to silence lessens your overall argument Pain, stop doing that.
No one disagrees with the fact that because of people's unconscious thoughts and perceptions that the world changed from a "real world" art style to a "manga" one. That doesn't prove nor disprove anything, it's useless conjecture. Also those aren't "direct statements", I've thoroughly explained why they have multiple valid interpretations in my previous post. So i'm not going to continually address evidence which I've already addressed previously, especially when said evidence isn't argued for with any conviction.
It doesn't need to say that because the statement doesn't have only one valid interpretation, it has multiple valid interpretations. Which I've provided and explained a plethora of times already. This constant appeal to silence lessens your overall argument Pain, stop doing that.