• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Dereck03 said:
@Dalesean027 have you checked that the changes were legit applied? If so then i'll do so.
Click to expand...
I'll just go ahead and say the use of the calc is fine for that thread so it has CGM approval behind it and is actually accepted for a change but aside from that he needs to actually link the calc on profile and the verse page, as well as find a new justification for this profile as we don't use blocking attacks as justification for LS so this shouldn't apply to this profile
 
Dalesean027 said:
I'll just go ahead and say the use of the calc is fine for that thread so it has CGM approval behind it and is actually accepted for a change but aside from that he needs to actually link the calc on profile and the verse page, as well as find a new justification for this profile as we don't use blocking attacks as justification for LS so this shouldn't apply to this profile
Click to expand...
Hanma is superior to 50 percent and 70 percent Taiju
 
Didn't a user link multiple threads of HollowVanity to prove just how consistently he's been spamming them?
 
KLOL506 said:
Didn't a user link multiple threads of HollowVanity to prove just how consistently he's been spamming them?
Click to expand...
How is making a thread considered spamming, I literally didn't even know that the thread thing was a rule but by the time I knew I already made all my threads ? I shouldn't be punished for this.
 
Syncornize said:
hi, I didn't think I had to reduce myself to this. I apologize for writing this here, but the more staff who know what is going on the better.
Some Tokyo Revengers supporters are going over the limit.

Currently there are open 6 threads or maybe more on this verse. Another one has been opened and they all have at least 2 common points that are being discussed in each thread. It is becoming impossible to make small revisions. Some supporters do not realize that they are being too pushy and sometimes unkind. I don't have the desire and time to discuss the same points every time in 10 different threads with the problem that an argument may pass as valid when it is not.

I apologize again for the problem ( I probably shouldn't even write it here and I apologize again for that). I am throwing at you but I have no power except to ask you for help. I hope you can intervene by handling this or closing some threads, this one in particular makes no sense for now.

THREADS: (I list them in order of opening)
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
Click to expand...
KLOL506 said:
Didn't a user link multiple threads of HollowVanity to prove just how consistently he's been spamming them?
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
HollowVanity said:
How is making a thread considered spamming, I literally didn't even know that the thread thing was a rule but by the time I knew I already made all my threads ? I shouldn't be punished for this.
Click to expand...
Up to three active content revision threads can be open for any verse. If three active content revision threads are in progress, the community must conclude one before creating a new one.
  • Marvel Comics and DC Comics are exempt from this rule to accommodate their continuous flow of large amounts of story material. Thus, they may have a maximum of six active threads open simultaneously. This exception also applies to extremely popular verses like Dragon Ball, to be granted on a case-by-case basis.
  • If a recent content revision thread is unambiguously ill-considered and of poor quality, please ask a thread moderator or administrator to close it to provide room for more alternatives.
  • Content Revision threads become inactive after remaining idle for at least one month.
    A member may have up to four active content revision threads active at once, no more than two of which can be about the same verse.
    Click to expand...
Click to expand...
More than three content revisions in a short duration is considered spam.
 
Last edited:
StrymULTRA said:
they're attempting to make multiple rules against the Bill Cipher threads
Click to expand...
I must clarify that the Bill CRT is only reminding that the potential problems exist. If you look clearly, you would find that they are not against Bill threads. It is an attempt to address the general problems in VS Battles Wiki. I would like to answer of the two CRTs if there is some misunderstanding on these CRT.

For the https://vsbattles.com/threads/reque...-revisions-overlaping-minor-revisions.158692/, many have made major revisions such as profile revision and such CRT may unknowingly conflicted with an ongoing minor revision. This CRT is an attempt to solve such conflict
StrymULTRA said:
A thing I noticed now is that the user made a spite thread against Bill after the Death Battle episode.
Click to expand...
Actually, I found that they have connections and they had Tier 4 key. That's all.
StrymULTRA said:
especially after they've openly complained about him getting Tier 2 stats twice.
Click to expand...
The complaints are posted in Death Battle General Discussion Thread, a place to discuss Death Battle. The comments in Death Battle General Discussion Thread and a CRT is different. In DBGDT, the comments are focusing on opinions regarding Death Battle Team's analysis. In CRT, the comments are analysis of the certain CRT's content. They are different things and I took different approaches when commenting in different threads.
 
Mariogoods said:
I must clarify that the Bill CRT is only reminding that the potential problems exist. If you look clearly, you would find that they are not against Bill threads. It is an attempt to address the general problems in VS Battles Wiki. I would like to answer of the two CRTs if there is some misunderstanding on these CRT.
Click to expand...
Both of these threads in particular seem to target the Bill CRTs and were using those as basis, so it definitely raises suspicion in my eyes.
Mariogoods said:
Actually, I found that they have connections and they had Tier 4 key. That's all.
Click to expand...
It was instantly closed for a reason.
Mariogoods said:
The complaints are posted in Death Battle General Discussion Thread, a place to discuss Death Battle. The comments in Death Battle General Discussion Thread and a CRT is different. In DBGDT, the comments are focusing on opinions regarding Death Battle Team's analysis. In CRT, the comments are analysis of the certain CRT's content. They are different things and I took different approaches when commenting in different threads.
Click to expand...
My guy, you literally called both of these CRTs wank, it's definitely what I define as complaining somewhere.

I definitely don't think you made these threads in a good faith at all.
 
StrymULTRA said:
It was instantly closed for a reason.
Click to expand...
It is closed per my request after Bill loses Tier 4 rating.
StrymULTRA said:
Both of these threads in particular seem to target the Bill CRTs and were using those as basis, so it definitely raises suspicion in my eyes.
Click to expand...
These threads only remind me that there are general and potential problems exist. And the purpose of such CRTs are to solve such problems in CRT.

For https://vsbattles.com/threads/reque...-revisions-overlaping-minor-revisions.158692/, I hope that there are more staff comments because it is to solve the major revision overlapping minor revisions. If said major revision is accepted, then what about said minor revision? And the CRT is an attempt to discuss the solution of such problem.

For the cool-down period, it is based on the consideration that people could factor recent Death Battle's verdict too much when doing CRT and therefore harm to the credibility of the CRT. It could potential reduce the heated off-CRT arguments, reduce the potential CRT wars and leave time to prepare more constructive CRTs (because rushed CRT may have less quality). It is unexpected for me that this has been discussed before.
 
Mariogoods said:
It is closed per my request after Bill loses Tier 4 rating.
Click to expand...
Proof? Because the 1st Bill CRT was made the 14th September and applied the 18th, your VS Thread instead was made the 11th.
Mariogoods said:
For https://vsbattles.com/threads/reque...-revisions-overlaping-minor-revisions.158692/, I hope that there are more staff comments because it is to solve the major revision overlapping minor revisions. If said major revision is accepted, then what about said minor revision? And the CRT is an attempt to discuss the solution of such problem.
Click to expand...
The Bill threads which were "overlapped" were simply never finished due to lack of staff members in both, so what was exactly wrong in making a big CRT which incorporates them? Same with TOH ones, the Intelligence thread was basically a dead thread at that point.
Mariogoods said:
For the cool-down period, it is based on the consideration that people could factor recent Death Battle's verdict too much when doing CRT and therefore harm to the credibility of the CRT. It could potential reduce the heated off-CRT arguments, reduce the potential CRT wars and leave time to prepare more constructive CRTs (because rushed CRT may have less quality). It is unexpected for me that this has been discussed before.
Click to expand...
Which was clearly an attempt to stop the 2-A Bill CRT, as it was one of the main things you complained about also in that CRT.
 
StrymULTRA said:
Proof? Because the 1st Bill CRT was made the 14th September and applied the 18th, your VS Thread instead was made the 11th.
Click to expand...
vsbattles.com

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

1. Can the following pages be unlocked so we can apply the changes: Done. And 2. Am I allowed to create a template page (similar to Son Goku's) for Arfoire? I am asking simply because we are creating a second profile for her that pertains to her appearance in Sisters VS Sisters, and we have a...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
It is after my personal reevaluation of both profiles after the CRT.

For the whole things, it'll be better for me to leave the staff members to judge.
 
StrymULTRA said:
So, about these...
Click to expand...
I don't think MarioGoods did anything wrong, at least not intentionally, though FireSwordHero telling people to "Go F themselves" is not appropriate here.

As for HollowVanity, while there is no IP Address overlap and thus no real hard evidence of them being the same, but it is common for those to have VPNs to get around that. Or people will different IP Addresses if they either move houses or replace routers and such. So it doesn't rule out the possibility outright, but harder evidence is needed to point to them being the same. Though I agree the vandalism is a rule violation that action may need to be taken regardless.
 
Mariogoods doesn't mean any harm, yes, and HollowVanity's edits were allowed this time as far as I recall.
 
vsbattles.com

Justice for Tokyo Revengers.

@Deagonx @Dalesean027 Would either of you be willing to handle it please? Still at work currently In that case, someone (not me) should either quote or link the relevant arguments and counter arguments. TR already has a bad rep Having a 7 page CRT full of the same arguments won't make it...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Reporting @HollowVanity for a constant disrespectful behaviour on the thread despite being warned multiple times, and at the end, ignoring the warning by simply telling others to go outside. And also provoking staff members by calling them biased for simply not evaluating TR threads for a good rational reasons.
 
ImmortalDread said:
vsbattles.com

Justice for Tokyo Revengers.

@Deagonx @Dalesean027 Would either of you be willing to handle it please? Still at work currently In that case, someone (not me) should either quote or link the relevant arguments and counter arguments. TR already has a bad rep Having a 7 page CRT full of the same arguments won't make it...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Reporting @HollowVanity for a constant disrespectful behaviour on the thread despite being warned multiple times, and at the end, ignoring the warning by simply telling others to go outside.
Click to expand...
Yeah lad, reporting me for saying you need to go outside after I made a harmless joke and you acted as if I disrespected someone, I hate when ppl take shit like that seriously and make a fuss about it. Its a light hearted joke in a not so serious thread.
 
 
Dereck03 said:
Reporting @HollowVanity for their behaivor in this thread.
  1. First warned by Deagon about his behavior in the thread. and then later procced to make fun of him.
  2. Called Lonkitt a biased for simply rejecting an evaluation in the thread which i simply deleted the comment cos of the disrespectful comment
  3. He continued trolling with more comments that I have already deleted.
  4. I gave him an official warning regarding all their behaivor
  5. Then came to my wall to call me cringe
Click to expand...
lad, you're chronically online if you think "Please translate to english" is making fun of him

I WAS JOKING, HE SAID "I'd give my honest opinion with absolutely no bias" so I thought it would be funny to joke about him being biased

My troll was saying "go outside if you think that I'm disrespecting him"

cringe isn't that deep, please stop taking shiz like that so srs 🤦‍♂️
 
 
Here @HollowVanity said @Dalesean027 was trying to downgrade TR and stuff like that (he said the same thing about me right before too).

EDIT: Also... Wasn't Mysticarnage (Vapourrrr) banned for the same reason or something similar? + I want to mention that when @HollowVanity entered the community another account (@DekuGlazer) has been added as TR supporter, his discord name is dekusolos, as you can see in his profile on the wiki, Hollow also commented in a MHA thread time ago but I can't find it.... Anyway @DekuGlazer has 0 edit and I only see him commenting like 2 times, I don't know if both are Vapourrr sockets and he made 2 accounts for idk hiding it somehow, Hollow and Vapourrrr have equal behavior and disrespect towards the staff, not sure here, but I thought it was worth to mention.
 
Last edited:
I agree with a permanent ban; regardless of whether or not he is a sock of Vapourr; which I see more reasons pointing to him being the same guy than not, he has been getting reported way too many times in a row and was being consistently hostile. Also death threats are generally permaban worthy. But all things considered, I support a permanent ban.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
Dereck03
Dereck03
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
711
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top