- 14,947
- 1,823
I did.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Naruto: "Possible" LS Reactions for God Tiers + Night Guy Stuff
- Thread starter TheFinalOrder
- Start date
- Status
- 11,051
- 10,410
"irrefutable argumentation."
Ok dude, stop with your fanfics. Every single thread you begins with disgusting behavior and speaks things as if he had an authority on the subject. This is over, you failed to refute TFO's arguments but your arrogance prevents you admit it. It's not hard to notice that you have a bias against Naruto, you deny this is the same as pretending that your disgusting behavior does not exist
Ok dude, stop with your fanfics. Every single thread you begins with disgusting behavior and speaks things as if he had an authority on the subject. This is over, you failed to refute TFO's arguments but your arrogance prevents you admit it. It's not hard to notice that you have a bias against Naruto, you deny this is the same as pretending that your disgusting behavior does not exist
- 14,947
- 1,823
He just claims his points as "irrefutable" and non has proven him wrong as if he is the decider on those things lol.
- 1,461
- 764
@M3X
Non-falsifiable claims are, demonstrably, irrefutably null and void in argumentation. I don't see a problem with claiming that to be true, much the same as someone claiming 2+2=4 would do the same.
This is derailing the entire thread to simply assault me, however, and is severely unappreciated.
Non-falsifiable claims are, demonstrably, irrefutably null and void in argumentation. I don't see a problem with claiming that to be true, much the same as someone claiming 2+2=4 would do the same.
This is derailing the entire thread to simply assault me, however, and is severely unappreciated.
- 14,947
- 1,823
Mhm keep believing that.Xulrev said:
This is assault? Next level victimhood. Also I thought you said you were not here to feel appreciated.
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #207
Resorting to extreme exaggeration? Seriously? Childish much?Xulrev said:
- 9,524
- 1,789
That's an appeal to authorityBlackeJan said:
You're saying that since they are scientists and we are not we are automatically wrong for saying something that is dissimilar to what you are putting out.
Even though science still doesn't support your points but thats another problem
- 14,947
- 1,823
That's an appeal to authority
You're saying that since they are scientists and we are not we are automatically wrong for saying something that is dissimilar to what you are putting out.
Even though science still doesn't support your points but thats another problem
Actually it does. And an appeal to authority certainly works when it is battle boarders Vs scientists.
You're saying that since they are scientists and we are not we are automatically wrong for saying something that is dissimilar to what you are putting out.
Even though science still doesn't support your points but thats another problem
Actually it does. And an appeal to authority certainly works when it is battle boarders Vs scientists.
- 1,866
- 332
Go ahead and explain why the link is legit in your own words instead of saying its correct since it's a scientific link.
- 9,725
- 8,479
Welcome to the world of HST threads everyone. If you wish to exit and save your brain-cells I suggest you do so.
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #214
@Everyone
Just ignore xulrev. Points have been made, scans posted, arguments made and refuted. From here on, whoever reads the thread will be able to decide.
"He's" begining to shift his goal points as everything he's said since steping in this thread has been steadily debunked, which is....ironic to say the least considering what he's accusing me of, but whatever. Just ignore it.
Just ignore xulrev. Points have been made, scans posted, arguments made and refuted. From here on, whoever reads the thread will be able to decide.
"He's" begining to shift his goal points as everything he's said since steping in this thread has been steadily debunked, which is....ironic to say the least considering what he's accusing me of, but whatever. Just ignore it.
- 8,018
- 1,323
That's an appeal to authority
You're saying that since they are scientists and we are not we are automatically wrong for saying something that is dissimilar to what you are putting out.
Even though science still doesn't support your points but thats another problem
Exactly my point lol. How u gonna disagree with scientist that went to find this stuff? of course yur goin to be wrong when I don't even have a 10% grasp on what they know and discaoveres so yes u would be wrong and it would be laughable to someone who disagrees on scientists that know ALOT MORE then u do
You're saying that since they are scientists and we are not we are automatically wrong for saying something that is dissimilar to what you are putting out.
Even though science still doesn't support your points but thats another problem
Exactly my point lol. How u gonna disagree with scientist that went to find this stuff? of course yur goin to be wrong when I don't even have a 10% grasp on what they know and discaoveres so yes u would be wrong and it would be laughable to someone who disagrees on scientists that know ALOT MORE then u do
- 14,947
- 1,823
He essentially wants people to get annoyed so he can do the whole 'gotcha you can't debunk me clearly this thread meeds to be closed" like he just attempted in my sekizo thread.
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #217
Ok...people can actually read and comprehend you know. I'm not stupid and neither is anyone else, your "holier than thou" act is what is amusing and might as well be John Cena as we can see right through it, sure, believe what you will.Xulrev said:
- 8,136
- 2,156
I don't think you all should try and assume a motive here...
- 14,947
- 1,823
I would not if he did not just pull that crap in my thread. And then try to do exactly the same thing again. If that is his debating style then he can do something about it because frankly it is annoying as ****.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:
- 1,461
- 764
It's an interesting tactic you're all taking when I've been re-asserting my exact same points, yet when it's convenient, attempts are being made at simply attempting to ignore the damning argumentation since it's simpler than actually engaging.
I bring up non-falsifiable claims being inadmissable, and suddenly the entire thread derails to overcorrect for an inability to engage that point.
It's amazing how the threat of reporting never came to fruition, side note.
I bring up non-falsifiable claims being inadmissable, and suddenly the entire thread derails to overcorrect for an inability to engage that point.
It's amazing how the threat of reporting never came to fruition, side note.
- 14,947
- 1,823
language
It's the internet.
It's the internet.
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #229
Taken Straight from The wiki's AP post, which has Additional Terms that're used for Speed As well:
*"Possibly - Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should also be indeterminate"
As the possibility exists and DT chose not to disregard the posibility when asked, Xulrev's argument can be disregarded. Simple. Will not address this again.
.
*"Possibly - Should be used to list a hypothetical statistic for a character, but inconclusive due to lack of feats or viable power-scaling. Probability of said hypothetical statistic should also be indeterminate"
As the possibility exists and DT chose not to disregard the posibility when asked, Xulrev's argument can be disregarded. Simple. Will not address this again.
.
- 829
- 168
Stop the hostilities, please. It does no good to anyone (especially those who lose their composure) and I am proof of that!
Come out, take a breath, leave the thread for a while.
Particularly ... I believe that a "Possible" would be of good size, but others believe that not. It's part of the process! Let others give their opinions.
Come out, take a breath, leave the thread for a while.
Particularly ... I believe that a "Possible" would be of good size, but others believe that not. It's part of the process! Let others give their opinions.
- 903
- 142
- 1,461
- 764
@TheFinalOrder
The issue is where you fail to grasp how a non-falsifiable claim being utilized for a 'Possibly' rating makes your idea fail apart.
For the exact same, unmitigated rationale you put forth Madara is Possibly lightspeed, I can put forth Madara is Possibly Zeus himself from Mythology. You cannot debunk that since it occurred offscreen when he fought Might Guy, of course. So it should be added, obviously, if yours is to be added.
Hopefully this helps you see how nonsensical the assertion is.
The issue is where you fail to grasp how a non-falsifiable claim being utilized for a 'Possibly' rating makes your idea fail apart.
For the exact same, unmitigated rationale you put forth Madara is Possibly lightspeed, I can put forth Madara is Possibly Zeus himself from Mythology. You cannot debunk that since it occurred offscreen when he fought Might Guy, of course. So it should be added, obviously, if yours is to be added.
Hopefully this helps you see how nonsensical the assertion is.
- 14,947
- 1,823
Nice strawman you got there truly puts your point across.Sekkonds. said:
- 8,018
- 1,323
R u saying I'm doing such thing? cause I'm not and I'm sayig the truth when u don't know much about the topic that a scientist who knows more about then u. That's like saying that yur teacher is wrong cause she tells u 2+2=4 yet u think the answer is 5 and u just started learning on how to countXulrev said:
- Status
Similar threads
