• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Content Revision Promotion Thread

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Head Bureaucrat
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Messages
168,530
Reaction score
77,292
This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse that the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Notes: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both our regular members and staff, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a too low staff participation to reach a conclusion.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated.

Also, if staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously.

Our staff and regular members should bookmark and regularly use the following two pages in order to make sure that they don't miss any updates to important threads such as this one:


 
Last edited:
I think that's already fine, provided that the evidence and information provided is presented in a clear and easy to understand manner.
 
No I mean, of course it's always fine but say it's a really obscure game I feel like specifying that would be helpful
 
I think that you can probably place such information in the "Notes" sections. Or do you want us to add another section specifically for this purpose?
 
Okay. That is good then.
 
Just a reminder that people can follow a thread by clicking the Follow button at the top instead of commenting.
Though like, if you don't visit the thread often enough it feels like you automatically unfollow it.

Or maybe it's following to many threads.
 
Though like, if you don't visit the thread often enough it feels like you automatically unfollow it.

Or maybe it's following to many threads.
If you press mark as read in the alerts tab above, it ends up messing up the notifications and it won't give you any alerts on that thread unless you actually visit the thread.

Basically I've learn to never press that button. I don't know if that could be the issue you meant, but I've never been unfollowed from a thread at all. In fact I've gotten notifications from threads over a year ago that someone necro'd. Though I imagine it could be a problem for different people.
 
Gluk`oZa Respect Thread
Priority: 2
Verse: Gluk`oZa
Description: Splitting up the current Gluk`oZa profile into two versions (pre-2018 and post-2018), adding missing abilities, in-verse scaling for 10+ characters and two species that can potentially be added to the wiki.
Note: Oleggator mostly agreed with the proposed changes and additions, but we'd need some current staff members.
 
is it fine to specify if a CRT can be evaluated by non-supporters?
Yes it was always fine. All CRTs should be evaluated by neutral parties too to an extent or it runs the risk of one-sided bias when only the supporters are involved.
 
I know that, as I said the specification would be more like "literally nobody knows this verse but me so please check this out even if you have no idea what it is"
 
KIngdom Hearts Conceptual Light/Darkness->Hearts and Nobody NEP

Priority: 1

Verse: Kingdom Hearts

Description: Type 1 Conceptual Manip and NEP for Nobodies, how the conceptual stuff affects the pages will be kept for another CRT.

Notes: The thread is quite inactive and there's mixed thoughts on whether a part of a type 1 concept qualifies as such even if it exists after birth, (staff) input for those knowledgeable in Concept Manip, Nonexistent Physiology or the series are appreciated.
 
I know that, as I said the specification would be more like "literally nobody knows this verse but me so please check this out even if you have no idea what it is"
That kind of thing should be fine to mention in the "Notes" sections.
 
Priority: 1 (Conceptual & Immeasurable)

Verse: Sage Monarch

Description: His tier was agreed upon in another thread, this thread focuses on giving him keys and abilities to implement the new tiers.

Notes: Only those 2 things left to evaluate. Conceptual is in spoiler at the bottom of OP.

Thread.

 
Last edited:
ik this isn't going to get much attention seeing as I've been the only one working on this verse(aside from requested staff help) so I hope this is fine

Priority: 2

Verse: World Trigger

Description: A crt to accept the creation of a new character profile and a blogged calc that would scale to everyone in the verse.
Here's the Thread


Edit: This thread has been taken care of, I appreciate the help.
 
Last edited:
This is just a note that I added the following text at the bottom of the first post of this thread:

"If staff members commit to helping out with a specific thread, they should press the "like"/"thumbs up" button for the related post here, in order to help other staff members keep track of what has not been attended to previously."
 
ik this isn't going to get much attention seeing as I've been the only one working on this verse(aside from requested staff help) so I hope this is fine

Priority: 2

Verse: World Trigger

Description: A crt to accept the creation of a new character profile and a blogged calc that would scale to everyone in the verse.
Here's the Thread
This has been covered already so thanks you guys👌
 
You guys like obscure anime series, right? (Pumpkin Night CRT)

Priority: 2
Verse: Pumpkin Night

Description: A near-complete overhaul of the Naoko Kirino page, including new abilities based on recent information and a few tier changes, and a revision of the Kazuya Makino page, adding some quality of life improvements.

Notes: The Pumpkin Night series has a very low presence on the Wiki with only two pages and only three people in total worthy of one.
 
One of several ongoing Touhou CRTs in need of proper evaluation/acceptance.
Priority: 2
Verse: Touhou Project
Description: Various ability additions for numerous characters, a new character profile (one that is necessary for future profile creations, as a number of currently unlisted characters scale to her), as well as a rework of the current High 3-A/Low 2-C justifications and another infinite speed feat.

EDIT: This thread has been closed, and everything left unevaluated has been moved to this thread.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top