• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
17,606

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Sorry for bothering you Can I get permission to comment on this crt


    thread has been made.
    Sorry to bother you, but if you have time, could you give section 5.1 of my blog a glance?
    Hi can you look at this pls

    sorry to bother you, but from this thread, i don't exactly know how to write the explanation for the blog, would you mind give me some ideas, references example, tbh, it is confusing, thank you very much, it is for DBH/XV anyway
    • Like
    Reactions: Khanhba01
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I'd include DT's quote
    Depends on context, but possibly yes. Although that hinges on the word time travel.

    Like, fundamentally you could say that you have one timeline that spans multiversal space. In the beginning, that space is empty. Then you rewrite the past so that 3 universes already existed in the space (which is the same as creating 3 timelines). So you rewrite the timeline of the multiversal space.
    Then you do the same again to add 5 more.

    Technically, you could say you only spawned several more multiverse spanning timelines. Like, now a empty multiverse spanning timeline, a multiverse spanning timeline with 3 universes and a multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes exist. The total number of timelines is only 11.
    If you are able to travel between multiverse spanning timelines, you would also be able to switch back from the multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes to the one without any universes/timelines.

    However, if you do that specifically via time travel, then that could be a good indicator that you are actually dealing with an additional time dimension. Because that indicates that the progression of the creation of timelines is done within a (presumably continuous) flow of time and that time wouldn't be that of the regular past where those universes always existed.
    And the the FAQ page

    Q: How do temporal dimensions impact on tiering?​

    A: The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinite points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

    This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two temporal dimensions (instead of just one) comprises a higher temporal axis that spans regular temporal dimensions that the entirety of 4-dimensional spacetimes, or equivalents to it are serviced by (This is similar to how the time dimension in a 4-dimensional spacetime continuum spans uncountably infinite 3-dimensional snapshots of the universe), qualifying it for Low 1-C. Unless fiction shows otherwise, a different multiversal temporal dimension spanning universes that themselves have their own time dimensions as well (not the same multiversal time dimension that services many Universes and is shared by them), or even a single universe with two active temporal dimensions, qualifies. The same applies to three or more temporal dimensions.
    Then since you know the verse better than I do, just give the following justifications:
    • The timelines are separate from one another. In other words its not a branching timeline but a bunch of separate timelines
    • When time travelling you make your own specific timeline rather than branching out a previous timeline
    • Showcase that if one timeline is erased another timeline is unaffected
    Then with the above say "Since Dragon Ball fulfills the above standards, each overarching timeline should be considered to have a different temporal dimension. Which would fit the criteria for a Low 1-C Hyper Timeline" or something like that.
    Hi Qawsedf, you've been actively involved in this thread.

    A different thread has now been opened for Ben10 and one of its foundations is still the same, 5-D space beyond.

    But there weren't enough votes, so I'm going to ask you to open this up again , because Space Beyond's downgrade from 5-D will also affect the new upgrade thread
    Hello, good morning from Brazil!
    Don't know who else to call, can you take a look on this thread? The discussion became very circular
    Hello

    Cab you check this thread, please?

    Uh, can u give your input on this thread?
    I will like to comment on this thread, if you do not mind.
    Can I get permission to make a post here?

    • Like
    Reactions: LuffyRuffy46307
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    To avoid clutter I would ask that if you're both on the same side of the debate to work together to make a singular large comment, rather than two separate comments that would cover the same idea.

    But yeah you two can make (up to) three comments if you feel like you can add to the debate..
    BasedNecoScaler69
    BasedNecoScaler69
    My bad, didnt see the fact it was a staff discussion, i got linked to it over discord and it just went straight to the post.
    Can i recieve permission to comment? Also, restore my earlier comment with the images.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    If I restore your post it will count as one of your three comments.

    But sure. Though like with the other two I would suggest to take your time with posting.
    Howdy, I'm Lemon, Lemon the Lemon and... wrong verse, any way feel free to ignore this mensage but there is a verse on the wiki full of bad profiles and me and the other supporters of the verse made a radical decision that need aproval and action of staff to happen, would You do this for this verse who always come back? Yes, It's FNAF
    Hey Qawsed, my thread is lacking staff input...
    Hey, could you please check out this thread?
    I know you probably aren't a supporter but at the same time I'd like your honest opinion
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I can't give permanent participation approval rules wise:
    • Only staff members with evaluation rights can authorize regular members to participate in Staff Discussion threads. Thread Moderators are able to grant permission for a single post at a time, whereas administrators can give permission for up to three. Bureaucrats are the only staff members that are allowed to give indefinite posting rights for a particular staff thread. If a staff member with evaluation rights determines that a regular member has misused their granted privileges, these can be removed.
    But if you want to make (up to) three comments go ahead I guess.
    🙏
    Quick question: can a CRT be accepted from 3 staff agrees, 1 neutral, and 1 disagree?
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    If it comes to an impass it can. Though the three staff agreements probably should be reissued after whatever debate happened is finished.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    What's your comment?
    TheShape03
    TheShape03
    I'll just leave a comment with the scans/arguments I have on the subject of Space Beyond and the Timestream (summarized), then I'll leave the rest in the hands of the staff because I heard the standards for Low 1-C are different now. No need for me to comment on the thread, I could send the summarized arguments to you here, then if you think that qualifies for Low 1-C then you could comment on it yourself on the thread.

    The commentary is basically evidence that there are infinite universes in Space Beyond, and evidence that universes are infinite in size with infinite dimensions. Space Beyond is larger than those infinite 2-A structures, and within the Timestream, Space Beyond and everything else as something infinitesimal.

    I'm not sure if that currently means any of those structures are Low 1-C but I think it's worth a try.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I think you should be good to comment then.
    859680447395135498.gif

    Sry to disturb , but would u mind checking my crt , plz 🙏
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top