• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Theglassman12
Reaction score
10,899

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hello,
    Can I have your input in this thread?

    Thank you.
    Not sure if you have the power to do it but


    Can you close this thread? Everything's been accepted and applied for a very long time now
    Your evaluation would be appreciated here.
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    I’m not a calc member, ask a calc member for this
    Godsatoshi23
    Godsatoshi23
    Oops, my bad wrong link.
    Can you take a look?
    Hello,

    I know this is not exactly your area, but seeing as you were active in the last few AC threads (including one about the very same topic), do you think you can help this reach a conclusion?

    Thank you.
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    You’re better off asking Calc members for this, they’d be able to come to a conclusion better.
    Hi Glass
    Would an entity with this description (in profile) default to lack the concepts of time and history itself (and thus be immune to abilities based on time and history)? Or need thread for that?

    (NEP nature 1 Aspect 1,2,3: Her true nature is nothingness, which lacks every aspect of reality that God created including soul, thoughts and concepts. She is the beginning and will be the end of them, when she will become all that there is)
    (Age: Inapplicable. Predates the creation of time.
    (Age: Inapplicable. Predates, and created, time.)
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    Not immune, maybe some form of resistance but that would need to be specified. Otherwise this sounds like type 4 acausality.
    Rabbit2002
    Rabbit2002
    Thank. In addition, plot travel and plot manipulation would affect a type 1 AE entity (type 1 concept. They are also omnipresent due to the concept of creation and existence) if the entity does not have acausality on profile? Example: travel the plot to a time when the entity has not become AE type 1 and kill him
    Or something like this
    Also this is pretty much conjecture because again
    X travels through the plot itself. The operates on the narrative scope not just time. So nothing stops their from going to an earlier point in the supernatural series to just Incap John from an earlier point in the series.

    Also just remember that X can just literally end the plot and permanently incap John

    Ending the plot would end reality, existence and the narrative across an above baseline 2-A range and While John and his AE1 would definitely survive the plot nuke….. John would be completely incapacitated because everywhere that we could act is now gone. There is literally nowhere he can operate because everywhere he could operate is now effectively gone and again… NEP does not favors here because he doesn’t lacks plot. Nor does he have feats of operating after the narrative of existence is gone. Since he is a Type 1 concept independent of reality….. he would survive of course….. but no he would be in a world where is no plot to make anything happen. So he would simply just exist unable to do anything. And X would still be there as well as their Acausal 4 plus Plot resistances can allow her to still be active after the end of the plot, narrative, reality and the series itself. So it would a force incon as now X would be in a Plotless world where reality and existence and the narrative don’t exists. And Jack has no feats of operating and/or attacking in a world where no plot exists.
    This is just one possible way to result in incon mind you
    As X still has the valid wincon of just going back to an earlier point in the series and GGing by friending or Incaping Jack
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    If the character lacks any form of Acausality then sure. If not then no.
    Just so you know KingNanaya isn’t the hacker, he also got hacked just like us. By the way, change your VSB Forums and Fandom account passwords the activate 2FA as well because they compormised every saved information they have on your computer. Don’t forget to initiate a full re-installation on your PC.
    got a message from "you" on Discord about some game "you" made. I assume you got hacked, so lmk if you manage to get your account back or if you end up making a new one, so I (and others) can friend you
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    Yeah I’m in the process of fixing this shit, tell everyone to block me
    PrettyFearMachine
    PrettyFearMachine
    looks like others beat me to it.

    do hope it gets fixed
    Hey there, can I please have you evaluate this thread for me when you get the chance? I believe it just needs one more staff approval to be passed. Thanks in advance.

    Hello.
    Can you close this thread?

    It's a stomp.
    BTW if you have 7-As, high-end 6-As, High 6-As, or even 5-Bs since I got Tirion nowadays, that would be great
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    I'd hope so, planning on making them my Magnum Opus on this site before I consider retiring.
    DaReaperMan
    DaReaperMan

    Here's the High 6-A I was on about BTW
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    Hmm, looks interesting, but yeah nothing that I can use right now that's fair comes to mind, I'll let you know when I got someone.
    Transduality type 2 I’m still a bit unsure of, pretty sure we’d need them stated to be above those dual natures, though to answer your question comic, you just need more than one duality mentioned as well as it extending across reality to get type 2, you don’t need a statement that all dualities ever are transcended.
    Hey, Glass, you said something like that. But doesn't Type 2 Transduality transcend all duality systems? So what you're saying here is "transcending all dualities on the plane of reality", but what if there are only 10 dualities in reality?

    I mean, shouldn't it be recognised that all duality systems are included in the verse?

    For example Rimuru. Rimuru transcends all duality systems in the verse, but not all dualities are exist in the verse. The same logic is present in Ergen Verse.
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    If there’s more than one duality that exists and it extends across reality it’s type 2. You don’t need “all dualities” to be spelled out for you to get type 2.
    Georredannea15
    Georredannea15
    Ahhh... I see, so as much as I disagree with that, I'll try my luck again about something for TD2, or open a staff thread to change the requirements for Type 2 Transduality, like with Acausality.

    Anyway, Thanks man

    Ahh I forgot one more thing. When I talked about this with Qawsedf, he said it's Type 1 (Ergen is example for this) so Ergen has Type 1 Transduality. frankly i'm not sure

    I will either make a few characters Type 2 TD or impose this requirement.
    Just curious, how many universes do the 2-C Castlevania people scale to?
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    18 at bare minimum
    Eseseso
    Eseseso
    Ok thx.

    Not like any 2-C can actually fight them what with all the hax they have.
    I'm curious Glass, for example:

    A character is "The order that creates order" with the order being laws and concept (sound familiar?) and if the character dies temporarily, the world's order is destroyed and the world is perish. And the bastard killed him, so can an ordinary resistance to concept manipulation/destruction keep me alive? Or do we need something like "concept of concepts" or abstractness layers?

    Same thing but here that bastard kills Order's type 3 concept itself, Order outperforms the one I mentioned above (to the point where it's just cog to its wheel)? Still a normal resistance to conceptual manipulation and I'll be fine?
    Rabbit2002
    Rabbit2002
    So the parts about infinite magical power or amplifying magic to infinity, if literally, don't convert to any layers (because it's undefined)? Even if it has shown to be stuffed with magical power that can penetrate resistance, or is the entire scan above nothing implying resistance even a single layer?
    Also, I have some questions about Power Nullification
    1/ If Power Nullification has shown abstract existence/incorporate negation, can resistance with normal Power Nullification (or Resistance Negation/Immortality negation) against it? Or does it need feat to resist that
    2/ Power Nullification works on baseline hax which can negate hax with more layered magnitude by default (layers are even infinite) ? If not, is there any connection between them (for example, I have power nullification that penetrates 5 layers of resistance, so I can affect abilities with potency of 5 layers? What about 6,7... even infinite layers then?
    3/ Does Powernull with conceptual source affect information manipulation type 2 or Plot Manipulation, and vice versa?
    4/ Does being "Concept of concepts of concepts" or something similar and crazy make it harder for you to interact with normal concept manipulation (and Plot Manipulation/Information manipulation type 2 if they affect normal concepts) ?
    5/ Is Resistance to Text Manipulation and Data Manipulation necessary if these abilities affect physical reality, or do you just need to resist Information manipulation type 2/Reality Warping ?
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    None of the scans really mention that’s the resistances increase infinitely, just that he’s growing stronger infinitely, which is just a stat amp at best.

    That’s just NPI, nothing about it means more layers.

    Your phrasing this question weird so idk what you’re arguing here.

    Not really as that’s far more esoteric and would need evidence to affect the plot and info, otherwise it would a NLF.

    You’d still just be concepts at the end of the day, at best that’s just a stronger concept, which wouldn’t bypass those hax if they can affect concepts.

    Don’t know what you mean by necessary, can you elaborate?
    Rabbit2002
    Rabbit2002
    Regarding the second part: If I have Power Nullification, but I only disable abilities with potency baseline, what about abilities with multi-layer intensity? I mean baseline Power Nullification can disable layered hax no matter how many layers ?
    Regarding the last part : think of it like DBH's Time Scrolls (or Some book from MGK), do I need text manipulation resistance to deal with scroll edits and destruction?
    And Data Manipulation, it's like this. Is it possible to resist it with information manipulation type 2 (as well as interact it As long as i can interact with information type 2?) ?

    Her body also began to turn into a huge amount of data. These data flowed and violently impacted, and actually wiped out all the data of some kind of virus. Finally, Suddenly, Lou Baiyue's cultivation broke through the trillion realm with ease, not as difficult as when Chen Qi and others were promoted.

    This is a common reason, because their research is much more profound than that of Chen Qi.

    "Then I will start to be promoted." Wen Hong seemed to have some insight: "The doom is like this. According to the principle, the life that appears in this world is just data. Countless data, gathered together, is the soul and body. Those catastrophes are all data, data erodes us, and when we die, we are disturbed by a certain law. Life is just the law of data flow. "
    That really doesn’t refute what I was saying in the first place.

    Did anyone say he had a time limit to say sorry? Because none of us said that. We said that he should say sorry to Raven, but he didn’t, and instead just let someone else do it for him. It could’ve been an hour or a whole day, if he had just apologized to her for what he said then we wouldn’t be this upfront about his behavior.
    It seemed like y'all were imposing a time limit. He'd already been warned for it, and said "my bad, didn't realise that was a rule".

    Despite that, 36 minutes after the infringing post, KLOL said that he may need a stricter punishment since he should've apologised.

    Dread saying, 49 minutes after the infringing post, "he still did not apologize?!?"

    You saying, 56 minutes after the infringing post, that he's just not apologising.

    They're not phrased like "Hmm maybe it's bad, guess we'll see if he still hasn't apologised a day from now", they're phrased like since he didn't apologise within one hour that he'll never apologise, and so a harsher punishment is needed.
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    Do you understand what is wrong with him literally saying" I didn't know that making creepy comments to people at random is a bad idea" is? Because that should be common sense to anyone who goes into a public forum discussing with folks who might not like comments like these in the first place.

    So you didn't actually pay attention to the comment he sent to Dread about how he wants someone else to make an apology for him, it's one thing if he just didn't respond at all due to not being online at the time, it's a whole nother thing entirely to respond and just tell someone else to do it for him as it just shows any lack of manners whatsoever.

    I'm not continuing this conversation with you beyond this Agnaa because if you fail to see the issue here then idk what else to tell you.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Do you understand what is wrong with him literally saying" I didn't know that making creepy comments to people at random is a bad idea" is? Because that should be common sense to anyone who goes into a public forum discussing with folks who might not like comments like these in the first place.

    He said he saw it as a joke and came from another public forum where "jokes" like that were common, which seems plausible to me.

    So you didn't actually pay attention to the comment he sent to Dread about how he wants someone else to make an apology for him, it's one thing if he just didn't respond at all due to not being online at the time, it's a whole nother thing entirely to respond and just tell someone else to do it for him as it just shows any lack of manners whatsoever.


    I did and I already explained to you why I think that's not what happened.

    I'd understand if you explained why you disagree with that reason, but this is the second time you've just repeated it without engaging with my reasoning, which feels bad.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top