Hello, Armor.
I apologize to bother you for this, but if you can, could you hop in
this thread? Not as a voter, but as a thread moderator.
See, there were these two characters. After a looong time, finally, a winner was voted on. However, then, the person defending the character who lost starts claiming that the match is a stomp, despite such a thing never being mentioned or hinted at before, or even true for that matter, based on the characters present. And now, said person is hold tight n their position that the match is a stomp, and not a decisive one.
For a tl;dr (because the thread is massive, and I won't force you to go through it all): the winner character has better maneuverability, agility and skill feats, and has access to flight, teleport, and a weak regen. The loser character has ways of blocking the winner's attacks effectively for a long time, sound manip, energy projection, as well as restraining her and attacking her with a form of attack/energy the winner has never faced before. The winner only has a x0.54 AP advantage.
I made sure to look up on what is accepted on the wiki, to be certain of what I'm advancing, but a stomp is when someone
can't win, not when they just
won't, correct? (as in, they are unable to effectively use the wincons to win, or they lose due to not using a wincon often or intensely enough. But as long as a wincon exists, even if the likelihood of success is low, then it's not a stomp?)