- 14,018
- 14,194
Not all verses can do these, so thats a problem you keep giving "solutions" as if those even can fit their series to begin with lolAgain, how is that a problem at all? It's still a range feat either way, whether it's something that's yeeted or a laser.
Then write a better story mister creative if the others arent great see how far that takes youbecause they lack the creativity/didn't think of it
you didnt see dragon ball entirely if you say its easyIt really is though. It's just timeline shit, don't see how it's complex.
Amd how many got it a mess even trying to be simpleAnd I didn't say everything can be simplified, there are of course things that can't or shouldn't be. But that doesn't man you can't simplify stuff time travel, it can be done.
Nothing is deep about asura wrath from gameplay perspective especially when other games supposedly of same genre do more in that aspectIt's simple yes, most arena beat em ups are, but it's still very wrong to call it mostly cutscenes. Because again, most of the game has you play in arena like areas either clearing hoards or fighting bosses. And even then it still has deeper mechanics, like guage management.
soul games are fantasy eldritch type in theme, which dont follow anything in particular, gow takes from myths of the greek with some liberty on some stuffElden Ring, a Soulsborne game of all things, was able to show off impressive shit like Rahdahn's star/meteor shower and the Elden Beast spewing stardust to fight in a realm with dozens of Erdtrees, in which the Tarnished beats. Shit like this, this can be done, and have Kratos scale to it.
never seen it, but last i checked this verse was rated purely out of statements with just a 7-B feat, till someone shown they werent literal and had no other evidence to support in any capacity, unlike others who get more to themAnd look at Record of Ragnarok and what happened to it.
The same people who claimed goku isnt universal even with a visual feat + statements, yet im suppose to not call them out cuz they ignore lore?And, it seems we've missed the plot here, but I want to reiterate that I don't doubt this stuff, maybe I think its a bit higher than I think it should be, but I don't reject this stuff entirely. I'm here explaining why people reasonably find doubt in the "tell don't show" shit, and why it's a bit lame to bash them when their doubts have justification.
I dont think an author keeps telling you a dude can destroy a galaxy so often to just be a fluke, that it doesnt show a visual its not out of not being true, but simply cant have a way to integrate that in, simply some works dont work like that, not even dragon ball aint destroying their surroundings despite their visuals or claims at times, you simply accept it, you think its false? Prove it instead of throwing the "no visuals not true"