Arguing he outhaxes seems to be easier than arguing he overpowers him. Maybe they can just say Kratos is just too durable or has a lot of endurance and then he can outhaxes Asura. I mean, they had Omni-Man beat Bardock even though they put Bardock thousands of times faster. (Main problem of the matchup was the Sun Disk).
Use helios light on underworld illuminating it which is huge in size and there you go
It doesn't help outside briefly using Icarus' wings and Hermes' footwear, Kratos isn't known to be a very mobile or agile character, good luck convincing normies and even certain other Vs debaters he's climbing upon large monsters, traversing mountains and rowing boats at MFTL to Infinite speeds.
Generally, statements are higher, so I think they win.
I mean they did that for Dragonborn v Undead
Dragonborn vs Undead also had the benefit of having their actual feats not making a difference in the results. Discounting lore would've still ended in the DB winning which is why they brought it up alongside the lore, no matter what the results were clear.
speed arguments this is actually strangely blatant
i always thought he did in those boss battles
im aware but this isn't a game kratos is taking given this is asura we're talking here
asura fought a shit ton of monsters without his arms just after fighting his master form the moon
Base powers still has the immortality neg + absorbing powers
6 months i reckon
Gave an example above
Travel speed =/= reaction speed
I mean there ain't much for super absurd reaction speed on par with Asura with Kratos without looking kinda crazy, most people ain't gonna be accepting that Kratos has literal infinite speed reactions and combat speed because an artbook called the underworld infinite.
Which Kamen Rider is that? Wonder what connections they have to go up against the damn Nahobino.
Well even if it's taken, they could get Asura to the same ballpark if they interpret the Naraka feat a certain way.
