• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
Leoduckiscool
Hi Udlmaster! Can you answer these WoD scale questions?
1. Can the Universe contain an infinite number of tellurians because the universe can contain all concepts so tellurians are not an exception because it is described as the concept of reality, am I right?
2. I found evidence that the universe can be found in the cells of a human finger, so does it prove infinite loop when tellurian is contained in the universe and that universe is contained by other tellurian and repeat infinitely?

Udlmaster
Udlmaster
1. Can the Universe contain an infinite number of tellurians because the universe can contain all concepts so tellurians are not an exception because it is described as the concept of reality, am I right?
Click to expand...
In the story, unsure (it's up the the Storyteller), though in terms of VS debating, recursive hierarchies don't really work out since they balloon in tiering and don't really hit and end point. It becomes that diagram of Set theory where Vsause just adds the sum total on top of itself without end and it just goes up and up and up.

I'd probably say that the Universe wouldn't/couldn't contain the Tellurian, as the Tellurian is considered to be a higher order of concepts. It wouldn't make much sense either with the plot line of the verse, since the point is the Universe and the Umbra are split off the the Universe is becoming more and more detached from the Umbra by the Weaver.

I found evidence that the universe can be found in the cells of a human finger, so does it prove infinite loop when tellurian is contained in the universe and that universe is contained by other tellurian and repeat infinitely?
Click to expand...
Theoretically they could, and if a Storyteller decided it to be so, it could be, though the idea of that is that "Everything is complete", that is to say, everything contains all other things, not in the sense that we would be bigger than the universe, but that we have the same "elements" that could be anything else, almost like a fractal.
Leoduckiscool
Leoduckiscool
Thank you so much!, can I ask one more question?, How many layers into 0 does Wod have, infinite layers into 0 or higher?
TWILIGHT-OP
Can u plz give ur input, on my crt it's just revamp profile revision and a speed addon
Plz send help.
1115267431917703188.gif
Wardokman69
Hello, is there a plan to make a profile or key for Yaldabaoth & Mekhane of Trashfire's canon?
Kinda want to see more of 2-A SCP stuffs fr
Saikou_The_Lewd_King
Saikou_The_Lewd_King
Maybe. Idk. If I feel like it.

To be perfectly honest I haven't seen anything truly tierable for these gods in any Trashfire stuff yet so I don't even know if it's possible.
Wardokman69
Wardokman69
The Trashfire canon actually quite developed. I heard it doesn't have noosphere so tier 1 stuff might be wont happen. Maybe. Well, if you're interested. That's it.
Saikou_The_Lewd_King
Saikou_The_Lewd_King
It doesn't matter too much if a canon is developed if it doesn't actually cover much about the Gods themselves. As it turns out most SCP content relating to those big gods is mostly anthropological rather than mythological.

I'll try and check it out in more detail eventually probably, but I can't guarantee that I can get anything out of this.
Greatsage13th
Good day, so any verse that makes use of characters from other works of fiction would be required to be purged or alternatively moved over to FC/OC right?
RandomGuy2345
vsbattles.com

Johnny Test Matchup Thread (Remade)

I told you I was back on my Johnny Test grind! This thread had to be remade, as the last one I made a while back is extremely outdated, and continuing off of that after the recent upgrades will just clog everything up in that thread. After the recent revision, as well as the banger of a match...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Got anyone for this?
RandomGuy2345
vsbattles.com

Johnny Test Matchup Thread (Remade)

I told you I was back on my Johnny Test grind! This thread had to be remade, as the last one I made a while back is extremely outdated, and continuing off of that after the recent upgrades will just clog everything up in that thread. After the recent revision, as well as the banger of a match...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Got anyone for this?
The_King_of_Prudence
I thought of an analogy for your tiering system argument:
Say there's a magical girl with tier 9 feats, and a small animal she can't harm because of some gimmick of her powers. Can we compare their strengths?
ShionAH
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I rolled back his edits and left him a message; I am about to be away for a few hours, and may not be able to instantly reply if this continues. If it does, contact another active staff member and tell them about the situation, including that he has had a warning from me already and ought to be banned accordingly.
AlphaOmegaV1
Hi, I know your busy but I was wondering if you'd be willing to give input on this when you get a chance since I know you get bombarded with these kinds of requests
Mukaddes
Greetings, Lephyr,

Now that you have found Scalem acceptable, we can discuss this more clearly in the future when other discussion topics are opened.

The other admins and most importantly your comments have been accepted together.

Can you turn off commenting so I don't have to bother replying to anyone?

vsbattles.com

Viego and Pantheon scale

Yes, please calm down. Things do tend to move very slowly around here, as we need to make all the necessary precise and well-considered preparations for each revision, so they are applied in coherent and well-structured manners and our wiki pages are not messed up. For example, I had to help...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Robo432343
vsbattles.com

Wizard101 6D

I was looking at the Wizard101 blog and it talks about the cosmology being 2-A when it was actually Low 1-C all this time. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Zenkaibattery1/Wizard101_level_of_2-A And Grandfather Spider's profile says this: "However, even all of this is stated to be an...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
🙏
JustANormalLemon
Howdy, I'm Lemon, Lemon the Lemon and... wrong verse, any way feel free to ignore this mensage but there is a verse on the wiki full of bad profiles and me and the other supporters of the verse made a radical decision that need aproval of staff to happen, would You do this for this verse who always come back? Yes, It's FNAF
JustANormalLemon
Howdy, I'm Lemon, Lemon the Lemon and... wrong verse, any way feel free to ignore this mensage but there is a verse on the wiki full of bad profiles and me and the other supporters of the verse made a radical decision that need aproval and action of a adm to happen, would You do this for this verse who always come back? Yes, It's FNAF
JustANormalLemon
Howdy, I'm Lemon, Lemon the Lemon and... wrong verse, any way feel free to ignore this mensage but there is a verse on the wiki full of bad profiles and me and the other supporters of the verse made a radical decision that need aproval staff to happen, would You do this for this verse who always come back? Yes, It's FNAF
TWILIGHT-OP
Can u plz give ur input on my PROFILE REVAMP for a character
vsbattles.com

REVAMP PROFILE FOR WANG LING

SO I HAVE THIS IN MY MIND FOR SO LONG THAT HIS CURRENT VERSION PROFILE LOOKS VERY TERRIBLE AND I WANTED TO MAKE HIS PROFILE LOOK GOOD SO I CREATED A SANDBOX HERE IS HIS ORIGINNAL PROFILE WHAT ITS LOOK'S RIGHT NOW AND HERE IS THIS NEW REVAMP SANDBOX...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
TWILIGHT-OP
Hello got sir, would u like to give ur input on PROFILE REVAMP plz

vsbattles.com

REVAMP PROFILE FOR WANG LING

SO I HAVE THIS IN MY MIND FOR SO LONG THAT HIS CURRENT VERSION PROFILE LOOKS VERY TERRIBLE AND I WANTED TO MAKE HIS PROFILE LOOK GOOD SO I CREATED A SANDBOX HERE IS HIS ORIGINNAL PROFILE WHAT ITS LOOK'S RIGHT NOW AND HERE IS THIS NEW REVAMP SANDBOX...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Dereck03
Okay, first I apologize for the use of the word "lame" since as I mentioned I am not the best with the use of English terms since it is not my primary language.

So answer me what I questioned you on, where did I even say I didn't read the thread.
  • Like
Reactions: DarkGrath
View previous comments…
Dereck03
Dereck03
Okay, thanks for the response and for accepting the apology, regarding this.
This was after having been repeatedly questioned on whether you had read the blog, giving an evasive answer each time. Being directly asked on how much of the evidence you had read, including whether you had read the blog, and stating the clear list of what you had read (without the blog being included in your list) is an admission that, at that point in time, you had not read the blog. The actively evasive phrasing does not change this fact.
Click to expand...
Reading the OP, means reading all the proposed evidence, I know that there are many staffs who simply agree sometimes just skim reading, but I am not one of them as I take my evaluation role very seriously and it shows in the amount of people daily asking for my evaluation. It is not an evasive answer as for me, my answer was very concrete, and I myself clarified having read the blog in this thread, same information + scans. I hope this clarifies that I did read everything that was proposed.

And I wanted to denote that simply agreeing with someone else's argument does not invalidate your vote, which is what is happening in this thread.

I believe it is a necessity for our wiki to function to its best capacity that staff members with evaluation rights give content revision threads adequate consideration, and I do not believe adequacy was demonstrated here.
Click to expand...
Here I do not agree, I am not perfect, but when you have those 2 questioning the validation of my votes every time is annoying, I gave many advices to stop, because not only to me, but to the votes of maverick and dalesan. And maybe you know this but I used to be just a Content Moderator and even then I was asked for a lot of evaluations on a daily basis and I did it and still had too many people questioning and invalidating my vote until I hit rock bottom here and decided to stop giving evaluations, so I get a thorn every time someone tries to invalidate my vote with nonsense excuses and obviously I will never insult them or anything, I will simply ask them to stop because it is annoying.

To sum it up, the accusation made that I did not read the thread, evidence, blog and all was baseless as I came from the same thread where the blog was accepted and took the time to read all the evidence.
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
I myself clarified having read the blog in this thread, same information + scans. I hope this clarifies that I did read everything that was proposed.
Click to expand...
Very well, then. Evidently, this was a misunderstanding. I apologise for any needless stress.
Dereck03
Dereck03
Okay, no problem and again I apologize for saying "lame" to you, it was just a misuse of words + stress by seeing too much criticalism towards me.
Back
Top