- 3,460
- 1,717
Actually quick question. Do the stones scale above Dormammu?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Why isn't Thanos (with all the Stones) 3-A?
- Thread starter ShadeTheNarwhal
- Start date
- Status
- 3,072
- 674
From what was shown, they really shouldn't.
- 103
- 22
- Thread starter
- #43
Individually, no. Together, probably not but there's a small chance that they could.AogiriKira said:
- 3,289
- 2,655
bumb
- 15,385
- 11,239
I agree with 3-A but if nothing else a possible 3-A should be fine.
- 65
- 3
Bump
- 5,434
- 757
As I said destroying the stones left him in a bad state, the only thing damaged when he first snapped was the Gauntlet not himself
- 12,552
- 2,508
Actually, you can see that his arm is damaged after wiping out half of all life.
- 1,714
- 182
Is the complete Infinity Gauntlet superior to Dormammu?
- 15,430
- 5,019
If it wasn't notable with the repeated mention of Dormammu, no one is taking this thread seriously, do you guys really think the stones surviving the big bang is going to be properly discussed here? Someone make another thread and close this one already.
- 31,624
- 5,419
Honestly this isn't the best reasoning. The stones did the same amount of damage even when doing this comparatively lesser feat which is supposedly very weak, namely destroying the stones, so how much damage they do to him isn't related to the feats he does. As for experience, Thanos has clearly studied it for years, and the supposed experience needed to use amounted to about a day or two. Not much of a difference there anyway.DMUA said:
- 8,821
- 9,405
Damn looks like Ironman died for nothing.
- 5,336
- 1,216
bunp
- 24,845
- 6,111
It's still a heavy dissonance between statements and feats, to which actual feats take priority
In fact, Iron Man and the rest, who actually had the gauntlet, and saw it in action, only said it would light up a continent
You could probably argue the feats are casual and not contradictory and such, but it still feels off
I dunno 3-A could be fine
In fact, Iron Man and the rest, who actually had the gauntlet, and saw it in action, only said it would light up a continent
You could probably argue the feats are casual and not contradictory and such, but it still feels off
I dunno 3-A could be fine
- 15,918
- 2,681
I'm honestly perfectly fine with 3-A Thanos, I just think it should be noted on the profile that doing such feat will likely kill Thanos.
- 3,072
- 674
Couldn't the reality stone turn the whole universe into dark matter or something?
- 283
- 20
If I remember correctly, it was only the Nine Realms.InfiniteSped said:
- 3,334
- 1,365
I agree with this.
- 103
- 22
- Thread starter
- #68
Question: If we were to discover that Thanos is truly 3-A, what would we do to add that to the page, since it's such a monumental change? I would imagine we would have to talk to an admin or something, but I just want to double check.
- 14,574
- 5,874
Staff input is a must for basically everything, either big or small changes.
You should move this discussion to a CRT and get staff input from people who knows about the verse and can tell how legit this is.
You should move this discussion to a CRT and get staff input from people who knows about the verse and can tell how legit this is.
- 508
- 345
Timeframe given?
- 103
- 22
- Thread starter
- #71
CRT meaning Content Revision, right? Sorry for the questions, I'm not super knowledgable on the forum part of the site.The Calaca said:
- 14,574
- 5,874
Yes.
I suggest you to take note of what has been said here when you create the CRT to be as specific as possible. You'll have better chances of getting proper input.
I suggest you to take note of what has been said here when you create the CRT to be as specific as possible. You'll have better chances of getting proper input.
- 61,134
- 14,543
Werent the MCU Infinity Stones created from the Big Bang?
- 61,134
- 14,543
"Before creation itself, there were six singularities. Then the universe exploded into existence, and the remnants of these systems were forged into concentrated ingots... Infinity Stones." ―Collector
- 11,484
- 7,685
I agree. There's that statement, the feat of them surviving the Big Bang and it was heavily implied Thanos's final snap was gonna be to do his goal of annihilating the entire universe down to its last atom. Plus it's the comic book adaptation of a weapon that gives you infinite control of nearly all aspects of the universe due to embodying its primordial concepts and is multiversal+ in sheer power. So it's not like it'd be that far fetched to say that even the nerfed movie version is 3-A.
Also it was only having the stones destroy themselves which nearly killed Thanos and he was planning on surviving the initial destruction of the universe in order to create a new one that's grateful to him.
Also it was only having the stones destroy themselves which nearly killed Thanos and he was planning on surviving the initial destruction of the universe in order to create a new one that's grateful to him.
- 11,065
- 13,766
According to the statement the stones were formed from the remnants of the sigularities after the big bang happened. Doesn't mean they can survive the force of the big bang. It's the same as saying Earth can survive the big bang because it was formed from it.
It being a comic book adaptation means nothing. Comic book infinity stones are much powerful.
That would make Thanos who survived the stones being destroyed, Wanda who destroyed a stone and other characters like Thor, Captain Marvel and Doctor Strange 3-A, which would be a huge outlier.
The statement isn't backed by anything, that's why it was rejected.
It being a comic book adaptation means nothing. Comic book infinity stones are much powerful.
That would make Thanos who survived the stones being destroyed, Wanda who destroyed a stone and other characters like Thor, Captain Marvel and Doctor Strange 3-A, which would be a huge outlier.
The statement isn't backed by anything, that's why it was rejected.
- 61,134
- 14,543
- 11,484
- 7,685
My point was that if an adaptation of a cosmic weapon that gives you near limitless control over the universe through embodying its core concepts is being stated to have universal power, there is little reason to doubt it. People are acting all incredulous towards the idea when really it isn't farfetched nor contradicted.
Wanda only destroyed the stone because of the similar power source of her magic. The stones getting destroyed clearly doesn't cause universal destruction, as shown with Wanda destroying it. Thor overpowered a beam of unknown strength which it was confirmed by the Russos that Thanos was just offguard and a screenwriter said that Stormbreaker's dwarven magic was inherently a counter to the stones. Captain Marvel was one shot by a single stone that was using an unknown amount of its strength. Dr. Strange only ever had control of one stone which didn't scale to his physicals. No one physically scales to all the stones. Even then that's outliers for them not proof the stones aren't that powerful.
Wanda only destroyed the stone because of the similar power source of her magic. The stones getting destroyed clearly doesn't cause universal destruction, as shown with Wanda destroying it. Thor overpowered a beam of unknown strength which it was confirmed by the Russos that Thanos was just offguard and a screenwriter said that Stormbreaker's dwarven magic was inherently a counter to the stones. Captain Marvel was one shot by a single stone that was using an unknown amount of its strength. Dr. Strange only ever had control of one stone which didn't scale to his physicals. No one physically scales to all the stones. Even then that's outliers for them not proof the stones aren't that powerful.
- Status
