2-B MCU Thor & Thanos: WoG Proofs

[Lloydblitzed]

You mean like the worthless Word of God that can't be used? Yeah we'll get right on that mate!

WOG is only irrelevant when the series contradicts it...

 

[DaReaperMan]

WOG is only irrelevant when the series contradicts it...

No. Word of God is irrelevant when the series doesn't support it either.

You wanna argue with Mr. 40K Message no-life about how site rules work?

 

[Planck69]

WOG is only irrelevant when the series contradicts it...

It still needs to hold up to canon information, Reaper is right about that. So far, this is a Tier 2 upgrade to people whose upper-end feats and in-universe statements are Tier 6/5.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

WOG is only irrelevant when the series contradicts it...

Yeah, WoG is only used if it has support in verse or provides a solid explanation to an in verse question that required more context. However, if the author says something random that has nothing backing it in the canon story, it can be ignored as our rules state.

Regardless, it seems this is rejected by majority of members and staff. I mentioned my thoughts already regarding the statements, some are fine, others are irrelevant (like the time stone stuff on Dormammu). But if we don't always use these sources especially if they don't have in verse support than I concede that they aren't going to help considering the large buff.

 

[Adem_Warlock69]

The IG is currently Low 1-C, the WoG just gives Thanos more leverage to actually scale to that

 

[Lloydblitzed]

The IG is currently Low 1-C, the WoG just gives Thanos more leverage to actually scale to that

Well how about we add the WOG to Thanos or the IG profile then, since 2-B is useless now

 

[LordGriffin1000]

Most of the other points either violate discussion rules made from prior CRTs on this verse (Lengthy discussions I should add), or they straight up have no idea how site standards work. IDK why we're entertaining this in the first place after all this.

I didn't know this.

 

[Georredannea15]

WOG is only irrelevant when the series contradicts it...

Lmao no. It should also be supported by contexts, statements and feats in the verse. Otherwise they are useless

 

[Qawsedf234]

Regardless, it seems this is rejected by majority of members and staff

In that case I'll close it