Here is my argument against/for the OP's summaries.
Upgrading the level of Dumbledore and Voldemort to the level of Grindelwald and higher;
Neutral, but I can see the reason behind this.
1. I'm guessing this part is trying to explain Voldermort's power and why he's below Grindelwald's tier. I do see the premiere about Voldermort being comparable to Grindelwald, but I'll let the supporters speak more on this.
· Upgrading the Credence level to the level of the city and possibly the mountain;
Disagree with the reasons I provided.
2. I'm seeing two different feats for Credence, which I'll comment on each of them.
- Splitting mountain: While the script provides context for the feat, visually identifying it would be helpful in calculating the feat's actual value rather than relying on assumptions.
- Seismic earthquake: Again, visual feats take precedence over scripts, so include a clip of them. While your explanation of seismic earthquakes is correct, energy quantities vary depending on magnitude. There is also the possibility that Credence's "seismic waves" aren't real ones. Just like you said, seismic waves are caused by the natural movement of materials within the Earth, such as volcanic eruptions, landslides, avalanches, and tectonic plates shifting. Credence's earthquake does not appear to fit any of those, and it is caused by magic, which requires a completely different chart.
In general, I cannot see these two feats being city or mountain level. If they were calculated to be 7-B or something, I might reconsider, but this is my stance for the time being.
· Upgrade Dumbledore's level with the addition of 7-B with a creation spell;
7-B Creation is fine, disagree with scaling it to his overall spells.
3. Dumbledore creating an exact replica of Berlin seems like
creation feats. For the feat to qualify as AP, it needs to fulfill all the criteria of a
universal energy system where the energy can be scaled to physical strength. Unfortunately, HP's magic falls under the Limited Energy System, which means Dumbledore's creation feat wouldn't scale to him physically. At best, I could see 7-B via Creation, but it most likely won't scale to his overall spells.
· Adding a postscript to the basic wizard levels is possible a level higher with unconventional and random use of powerful spell forms such as Dancing Feet Spell or Alderton's feat level;
Neutral, these spells were performed in unspecified circumstances and may not be applicable to other spells.
4. It appears that you have compiled a number of feats from various wizards, so I will go over each of them again.
- Mount Vesuvius eruption: It looks like a good feat, but does every single spell scale to this one specific spell that caused a mountain eruption? HP's magic system does not seem to indicate such things.
- Archibald Alderton has no visual confirmation of how he blew it up, so this is just an unqualified feat. Also, he blows up a hamlet, not a town, which is smaller than a village or a town.
- Dedalus Diggle creating shooting stars doesn't have a link to the feat.
- Neither does the tornado creation spell.
· Creating and manipulating pocket dimensions;
Disagree with the room in OoP being a pocket dimension. The dimension in which Dumbledore fought seems fine.
5. First, I would suggest that you put the chapter numbers as the reference, so that everyone could find it easier. Second, there are a few problems with this feat:
- How did you assume that room was a pocket dimension when there is no evidence for it? The planets in the room could just be models, not actual planets.
- If the room was an outerspace dimension, how did Luna and the crew not suffocate from the lack of oxygen? How can they see Uranus up close when the planet is not visible to naked eyes? Do they somehow travel close enough to see it or what?
- How does Luna blow Pluto at someone's face without accidentally hurting her friends from the blast too? And finally, how did the Muggles not notice Uranus being mysteriously blown up?
Altogether, the feat isn't anywhere remotely close to Tier 4. The planets aren't actually planets, the room has no evidence of it being a pocket dimension, and Luna blowing up "Pluto" definitely won't give her Tier 4 either.
· Increasing the range of spells from tens to hundreds of kilometers and increasing the effect of teleportation to several thousand kilometers with the help of portkeys, distortion of space-time using Apparition;
Somewhat agree with this. The range of each spell should be specific; the same is true for teleportation.
1. They have intercontinental portals, which is cool, but it does not seem like something they could use in a normal fight.
2. This probably could give pocket-dimension manipulation or some sort of spatial manipulation.
3. Teleportation via spacetime manipulation? I guess it's fine, but you should specify what its exact limitations are (how far can they teleport, does it consume their energy, can they use it in a straight fight, etc.)
· The relationship between physical characteristics and magical power;
Physical strength and magical power are unrelated for the reasons listed below.
The concept behind scaling HP magic is that magic and physical strength are completely separate entities. Dumbledore can cast an 8-A spell, but he cannot withstand an 8-A attack. He can, however, create an 8-A forcefield to counter the attack. This means that while some spells are scaleable to one another, not all can be equalized for the reasons listed below.
- Limited Energy System: A Limited Energy System is a system in which supernatural or other feats, that are not based on the characters' body strengths, neither scale to physical statistics nor to all other non-physical powers the characters possess. However, certain sets of abilities still scale to each other due to being part of the same system. An example of that might be a character that uses both Chi and Magic to fight, in which case a fireball spell may neither scale to Striking Strength or Durability nor to the strength of Chi blasts that the opponent fires. However, the strength of the fireball spell might still be scaleable to other magic, such as the strength of water spells.
The second reason is that the majority of the spells in HP aren't used for combat. For example, one spell can cause explosions, while another simply disarms the opponent. Of course, there have been instances in which HP characters used non-fatal spells creatively in combat, but the general idea is that each spell is designed for a completely different purpose than simply dueling to death. Scaling an 8-C combustion spell to a spell that has only been used for knocking enemies out non-fatally sounds pretty illogical.
· Upgrading the physical characteristics of Albus to the Credence level;
Weren't most wizards physically as strong as each other? If you are referring to the clip in which they fought, I believe they were both using magic to push each other at the time, so it could not be scaled to their physical stats.
You could see their wands shining, though. I don't think there is evidence to scale Credence's physical strength to Obscure?
· Adding to wizards is the ability to absorb each other's life forces when spells collide;
Neutral, depend on which interprations is correct one.
This has two interprations:
1. They are absorbing each other's power, which will grant them absorption.
2. The battle has left them exhausted because they have used a lot of energy casting spells.
· A small upgrade of the wizards level with the help of the feat of creating a tornado that scattered a thundercloud;
Neutral, I think Dweller debunked this before.
· Scaling Obscure's Power to the rest of the Wizards;
Neutral, there is a lot of evidence that Obscure poses a significant threat to wizards, and it took many people to bring it down, so Obscure's power likely cannot be scaled to individual wizards.
The main point of this argument is that you need to prove that ordinary wizards are capable of similar destructive feats as Credence. If they require more powerful magic to perform such feats, they obviously cannot do so normally, which contradicts the reason they scaled to him in the first place.