• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Remove all forms of flight from Yang Xiao Long's profile

Status
Not open for further replies.
WeeklyBattles said:
Ricsi-viragosi said:
That is a lot of consecutive errors one after another, being consistent with each other...
Click to expand...
This unironically summs up a lot of the action scenes in the first two volumes of RWBY
Click to expand...
Do you mean ironically? Also he's very clearly being sarcastic, "multiple inter-consistent errors" aren't errors.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
No, i mean unironically.
Click to expand...
Well your grammar is way off, since he was being sarcastic and didn't mean what he said. This would be textbook irony, but let's not get into that. Focus on the questions we're asking about Yang.
 
Iv already answered them

And im not going to prove a negative. If you seriously want a WoG statemnt that Yang cannot fly you are free to ask the people who work on RWBY yourself but i am not going to go out of my way like that just to prove she cant do something
 
Kingofwolves999 said:
None of those errors are as egregious as "we forgot to put whole trees there to show Yang bounces off of them, but did put them there when we show her... bounce off of them."

Prove it's an animation error, if you would be so kind.
Click to expand...
Except you see the leaves shoot up from the trees shes jumping off of
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Iv already answered them
And im not going to prove a negative. If you seriously want a WoG statemnt that Yang cannot fly you are free to ask the people who work on RWBY yourself but i am not going to go out of my way like that just to prove she cant do something
Click to expand...
If a positive supported with evidence, you are required to provide proof for the negative in order to render the evidence in question invalid. Otherwise you fail to disprove the positive, and their point still stands.
 
A positive with evidence has not been provided. Ask them yourself. Iwill not be responding to this question again and have also reported your behavior in this thread to the admins.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
https://youtu.be/DinvarKwS1U?t=188

https://youtu.be/-p4iS_p3b8E?t=174
Click to expand...
Neither of those prove it..?

The first clip:

  • Is from a point where she should already have the raw AP to do it.
  • She specifically planned to do land, not stay mid air.
The second clip is her trying to get away from the grimm and then to shoot them from mid air. At no point does she try to change the direction she moves, or to stay in air.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
A positive with evidence has not been provided. Ask them yourself. Iwill not be responding to this question again and have also reported your behavior in this thread to the admins.
Click to expand...
I showed you three times it happens on screen, and it's later shown that she can do it with her semblance.

So if she did it without her semblance, and later with her semblance... you can't just accept the latter but call the former an error.
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
I showed you three times it happens on screen, and it's later shown that she can do it with her semblance.

So if she did it without her semblance, and later with her semblance... you can't just accept the latter but call the former an error.
Click to expand...
You kinda can seeing as her semblance increases the power of her shots
 
WeeklyBattles said:
You kinda can seeing as her semblance increases the power of her shots
Click to expand...
So what?

She is shown propelling herself with her shots before and after her semblance. You can't disregard the first nad accept the latter.
 
Man, people in Hell must be having a full on ski trip with Weekly so vehemently trying to downgrade RWBY. You truly never know what you will wake up to. Who knows, maybe Ionliosite will start liking MhA too ƒÖé
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
So what?

She is shown propelling herself with her shots before and after her semblance. You can't disregard the first nad accept the latter.
Click to expand...
The only time she has shown to not need somethin to propel off of is with her semblance
 
WeeklyBattles said:
The only time she has shown to not need somethin to propel off of is with her semblance
Click to expand...
...And the scans I gave.

And she punches back to propel herself forward a lot mid battle, including her trailer, just not midair.

So we know her gaunlets had enough power to push her several meters even before the series began chronologically.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
A positive with evidence has not been provided. Ask them yourself. Iwill not be responding to this question again and have also reported your behavior in this thread to the admins.
Click to expand...
If you're not bluffing, what site rule did I break by calling you out for your fallacious arguments?
 
WeeklyBattles said:
A positive with evidence has not been provided. Ask them yourself. Iwill not be responding to this question again and have also reported your behavior in this thread to the admins.
Click to expand...
Can you please tell me what here is worthy of being reported?

Because flaunting threats like that is a no-go. You had disagreements with people and arguments on the daily that last until you decide to quit. You have not been warned for how aggressive you can get, and neither have I.

Being confrontational is not a reason to report someone, so what rule was broken?
 
Jokes aside tough, I would actually like to hear some rule or the kind being broken here. If it's slipping my mind, that's fine, but baseless threats is extremely unbecoming of a content moderator, and the main reason for a good part of infamy of the wiki.

It's certainly not something you can throw out there and expect nothing to come of it.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Ricsi you know full well that i havebeen reported dozens of times
Click to expand...
Yes, but not by other moderators. We had people reporting barney, the profile, for not being tier 0.

You and I are held to a higher standard, and the very first thing that was requested of me was to promise to not abuse my position or to not become a mod at all.
 
Nico-v11 said:
That she was literally flying in Vol 1 without her semblance and Weekly refuses to acknowledge the obvious truth of the situation.
Click to expand...
Let's not aggravate stuff further, eh?

As of now, he failed to give proper proof for his calims, so I am relatively certain that if anyone actually reads through the thread they'll agree.

For now, I want an explaination for Weekly's threat.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Because she wasnt. Ive already explained she was bouncing off the trees below her
Click to expand...
I gave you three images where she visibly doesn't.

There is one time where the leaf effect is thrown in, and honestly, why would they put it into that one explosion and leave it out of all the others?
 
Kingofwolves999 said:
LOL you think you're going to get banned because Weekly is threatening you? He's being a bully, nothing anyone has said is getting them banned. If anything; he should be penalized for making someone submit to his stance by threatening them with a ban.
Click to expand...
Again, for now let's not acuse please.

I will ask him for an explaination of why he believed the comments here were worthy of being reported.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
All of the pictures you posted had leaf effects thrown in immediately after, watch it in slow motion if you have to
Click to expand...
I have. There weren't.

There were over six explosions there. Screenshot the leaf effects for each one, please.
 
If he can declare a thread a stomp and get an admin to close it without evidence, I imagine he can have me punished for my very clear hostility toward him on this wiki.
 
@Ricsi fair I'll calm down.

In vol 1 ch 8 we also see that she is capable of propelling herself in an upward motion with her gauntlets.

She was not propelling herself via trees as we saw explosions being the major propellant. What would be the point of indicating explosions in the show if not to show that she is capable of launching herself hundreds of feet through the air with them?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

CurrySenpai
The Great Remnant Quest to Downgrade RWBY [Part 1]
7 8 9
Replies
328
Views
16K
Dalesean027
Dalesean027
Wokistan
Yang vs Xiao
Replies
26
Views
2K
First_Witch
First_Witch
Hagane_no_Saiyajin
Sunny Dragon vs Flying Dragon
Replies
23
Views
2K
RedReaper616
RedReaper616
CurrySenpai
  • Locked
The Black Swordsman vs. Yang (Rematch)
6 7 8
Replies
307
Views
13K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
  • Locked
RWBY 2024 CRT Part 1: Maiden Scaling
2 3 4
Replies
135
Views
5K
Cire
Back
Top