Urgh, do i really need?
I don't remember this rule please show me it exists. Otherwise FRAing and leaving it at that would be dead and we would have versus threads with people quoting stuff or giving long-winded explanations on their choice of victor.
I mean, given that the arguments that youre FRAing have been thoroughly debunkd it is pretty obvious that you are not reading, this isnt a matter of opinion its kinda just fact
Thank you very much I really appreciate the support even if it's one person.
vsbattles.fandom.com
I think the other arguments make more sense. it's subjective.
It is a subjective saying which one is above which. it is indeed an opinion.
why is it not considered standard equipment? and why is her Aura 8-A? it doesn't say anything about 8-A aura when I looked
my glasses broke
If Person 1 makes Argument A, then Person 2 makes Argument B that addresses the flaws of Argument A, then people say "Person 2 FRA", that makes sense
Versus Thread Rules
The VS Battles Wiki is mainly a site that attempts to index the statistics of characters across many different fictional franchises. However, as the site name implies, we also allow our members to pit fictional characters against each other in hypothetical matchups for entertainment purposes...
"The winner will be determined by the side having better constructive arguments, rather than one word/one sentence votes, which will be disregarded."
Such as? Thus far no one has been able to provide a reason for Kirito winning that hasnt been debunked by at least three people
MrKerf literally made a reply with the reasonings we’ve been using and even politely added some new ones. IDK what to tell you man.
My guy. There is no other argument. You are literally agreeing with something that does not exist.
vsbattles.fandom.com
we really should not.
And i reposted the reasoning debunking them. The fact that he had the balls to claim that Kirit was more skilled even after everyone proved that to be false really shows how much he's ben paying attention
1. The problem with this in VS battles is that we're supposed to be using information taken directly from their verses and pages on this wiki. There's really no way we can insert our own opinions into these debates. It's not like we're arguing about which ice cream flavor is better. If Character A has done more impressive feats compared to Character B, as well as has more abilities that can directly address B, then Character A wins via basic logic. No opinions here
why? Kirito's page says he lost against Yang. Why would we remove it?
it says it can be used to block attacks from stronger characters. it's defensive. I agree. But where does it say 8-A anywhere?My guy. There is no other argument. You are literally agreeing with something that does not exist.
Aura (RWBY)
Aura is a core ability in RWBY, a manifestation of the soul, a life force that runs through every living creature on Remnant, whether they are a meager shopkeep or a renowned knight[1]. Aura is the manifestation of one's soul in RWBY and can be used for a wide range of abilities. The specific...
Reposting this. Her aura is 8-A
Subsonic travel speed, Supersonic+ combat and reaction speed (Fights at speeds where players that could see Flashing Penetrator would only see a blur)
Weekly, I am barely arguing on this point out of respect for others, but for me RWBY skill level was always on the level of the wet napkin. Showings suck.
Put on profile the upper limit of Burn, then talk. Right now, both are upscale via their own means.
Weekly, predicting monster whilst surrounded on level 1, meaning upscaled significantly is more then barely reacting to OMG a kick.
It would. It can bypass system rules, so it can certainly bypass Aura. I am pretty sure it even was able to bypass Invulnerability.
Legit i really do love how neither character underwent any revision since that thread was made, he straight up just remade the fight because he wanted Kirito to win and got his friends to FRA train the thread before any RWBY supporters could show up lmao
No, I'm not gonna remove that one I'm saying if THIS one gets added because earlier Weekly said he would just send it to the VSremoval thread if it passed.
Because he would have an W under the same conditions
Please do not refer to me with male pronouns kindly.
Apologies.
bold accusation
Its less about RWBY and more that i genuinely hate this site's current VS thread culture of 'if we FRA train the thread in favor of one character then the arguments dont matter'. Yall cant see that youre wrong so youre just falling back on numbers when you have no argument. That irritates the **** out of me. Its less about who actually wins via a debate now and just which character is more liked.
bro
Tuff tiddies, that's not our problem
Aaaand that's enough.
They are not debatable. They have been debunked. Multiple times. Just becuase you dont want to accept it does not mean its false.
They were directly debunked by me, Weekly, and at least 2 others who's names I do not want to destroy my eyesight staring at a screen to search for
you say as you destroy your eyesight staring at a screen
