- 2,692
- 952
I personally think Low 6-B is a fine rating for someone like ace, but he's controversial, even for me.So, just to go back to Ace, do you think that Ace is roughly over half as strong as Whitebeard is?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I personally think Low 6-B is a fine rating for someone like ace, but he's controversial, even for me.So, just to go back to Ace, do you think that Ace is roughly over half as strong as Whitebeard is?
Yes, i don't agree with 6C Yonkou, but that does not change that simply because a character can amp non-amped forms are never using full power, it could be the full power of that transformation.Don't we actually accept those as strength amplifiers though? He may hit them with all the strength he can in G2, but the cap for G4 is higher, no?
This is the reverse of my previous statement.So, just to go back to Ace, do you think that Ace is roughly over half as strong as Whitebeard is?
Which you shot me down for.Ace's calc is 1/20,000th what his peers scale to. I doubt it would be safe to scale someone strong enough to be a commander 1/20,000th of the others.
You can't be 1/20,000th of someone and match them, that's an issue.
Feats and statements that are valid.This is the reverse of my previous statement.
Which you shot me down for.
We don't scale off of what we think Damage, we scale off of feats.
And sometimes implications can be valid.Feats and statements that are valid.
So that wouldn't the their actual full power?Yes, i don't agree with 6C Yonkou, but that does not change that simply because a character can amp non-amped forms are never using full power, it could be the full power of that transformation.
Which you shot me down for.
We don't scale off of what we think Damage, we scale off of feats.
The full power of their whole arsenal? No.So that wouldn't the their actual full power?
You're acting like in a 3 day long battle, WB wouldn't use his Gura gura on roger, when he used it on oden to oneshot him.Except when lack of feats exist it seems, then you just say "Roger must be equal to Whitebeard's strongest quake seen in the series."
Which is where all of the 6-B Striking Strength is derived from.
If you want consistency and supporting feats from a man who's dying on a rescue mission then go ask Oda in an SBS to send another flashback of WB making Tsunamis. Roger was stated to be his equal and he fought him for 3 days. It doesn't matter if you think it seems wrong, it's a valid feat and there's no valid reason to downgrade it except the Argument from belief that this thread is full of.Except when lack of feats exist it seems, then you just say "Roger must be equal to Whitebeard's strongest quake seen in the series."
I can name god knows how many verses who do this, who scale striking and such off of their strongest feat.Which is where all of the 6-B Striking Strength is derived from.
Whitebeard using it on him doesn't mean his striking strength scales. At best it means his durability scales.You're acting like in a 3 day long battle, WB wouldn't use his Gura gura on roger, when he used it on oden to oneshot him.
Roger doesn't have a devil fruit, he would definitely scale with striking strength, they literally clashed with their blades lmao.Whitebeard using it on him doesn't mean his striking strength scales. At best it means his durability scales.
Roger and Whitebeard have been shown to be equals, they wouldn't be equals if Roger wasn't able to match Whitebeard with the Gura Gura.Whitebeard using it on him doesn't mean his striking strength scales. At best it means his durability scales.
What does them clashing blades have to do with the Gura Gura fruit?Roger doesn't have a devil fruit, he would definitely scale with striking strength, they literally clashed with their blades lmao.
Because WB had to have used it, and knowing Roger's arsenal, his own striking strength would scale to it.What does them clashing blades have to do with the Gura Gura fruit?
WB's AP = Roger's APWhat does them clashing blades have to do with the Gura Gura fruit?
Off-topic, can you send a list to me somewhere other than this thread? I can give you my discord for that if you want.I can name god knows how many verses who do this, who scale striking and such off of their strongest feat.
You're asking questions that I don't even know how to answer.KingTempest; so if Whitebeard used his Striking Strength + his Gura Gura at the same time, wouldn't he be twice as strong as Roger?
Well, 6-B Yonko are probably fine for the moment, but I am not sure about the rest.Plus we're going off topic. The majority of this thread, agrees with scaling admirals to 6-B, and most of it also agrees with commanders too. @Antvasima What are your thoughts at the moment?
I think at LEAST admirals should be 6-B, but the rest can be debated.Well, 6-B Yonko are probably fine, but I am not sure about the rest.
ExactlyQuestion for those who disagree with Admirals scaling.
If Akainu pulled off better feats than WB (High 6-B type feats) and WB scaled to him.
Would we say WB scaled to Akainu's feat and downgrade Akainu?
Nobody had this energy when Akainu and Luffy were buddies in 7-A+, but since it's Admirals and Whitebeard, all hell breaks loose.
Thank you for informing us MitchThis needs to be said because it’s probably relevant, just was informed that my cloud calc has some issues with it, so yeah, it will be nuked again probably to even lower levels of Tier 7, which is all I’m gonna say
Talking = 6-B. Hitting something = low 7-bDidn't both Whitebeard and Blackbeard's gura gura no mi activate just by them talking? Yet we're acting like it's questionable that Whitebeard would use his fruit against Roger in their 3 day long battle...
This as well. The energy wasnt the same when every top tier and g4 luffy was high 7a. So what's the real issue?Also another thing. @Antvasima @Damage3245
What's wrong with people like ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals scaling to 6-B like the yonkos? They were LITERALLY just High 7-A, the yonkos were, and so were ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals. They were ALL High 7-A. So please tell me, what's wrong then? If anything whitebeard was CLOSER to the others when he was High 7-A, and here we're proposing 26 teratons against 14. Which is a HUGE difference, compared to what they were once they were High 7-A. It's just a bit weird how CLOSE they were once they were High 7-A, and there's nothing said about it, not to mention that it's huge lowball, specifically from damage. The difference in their 6-B's, is BIGGER than their differences, when they were HIGH 7-A. I just find it unfair how there's nothing wrong when they're closer at High 7-A, but at 6-B it's a huge problem. I also believe we should settle this quickly, because so far there hasn't been an argument to debunk admirals NOT being 6-B, except "it's inconsistent" but NO ONE said this when they were all High 7-A, with commanders, and yonkos, which is beyond unfair.
Exactly, the logic of "weird" and "too close" makes ZERO sense, when they were EVEN closer when all of them were High 7-A.This as well. The energy wasnt the same when every top tier and g4 luffy was high 7a. So what's the real issue?
Multipliers without statements can't be used, you know that.KingTempest; so if Whitebeard used his Striking Strength + his Gura Gura at the same time, wouldn't he be twice as strong as Roger?
Great point. The original sticking point was that only Whitebeard had 6-B feat - which could arguably be limited to just him and Roger because they are the absolute God Tiers, but if Blackbeard also has a similar accepted feat then there is no reason not to scale the other Yonko and the Admirals to himAlso another thing. @Antvasima (this is meant for damage, I just want you to see this and give me your thoughts) @Damage3245
What's wrong with people like ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals scaling to 6-B like the yonkos? They were LITERALLY just High 7-A, the yonkos were, and so were ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals. They were ALL High 7-A. So please tell me, what's wrong then? If anything whitebeard was CLOSER to the others when he was High 7-A, and here we're proposing 26 teratons against 14. Which is a HUGE difference, compared to what they were once they were High 7-A. It's just a bit weird how CLOSE they were once they were High 7-A, and there's nothing said about it, not to mention that it's huge lowball, specifically from damage. The difference in their 6-B's, is BIGGER than their differences, when they were HIGH 7-A. I just find it unfair how there's nothing wrong when they're closer at High 7-A, but at 6-B it's a huge problem. I also believe we should settle this quickly, because so far there hasn't been an argument to debunk admirals NOT being 6-B, except "it's inconsistent" but NO ONE said this when they were all High 7-A, with commanders, and yonkos, which is beyond unfair. Damage this is directed towards you bro. Your logic is just unfair/flawed with this case, it's very hypocritical, that you don't mind an Almost NONE difference (1.1 gigatons) when admirals/commanders were possibly High 7-A, and yonko were at least High 7-A, which is essentially the same thing, since they're BOTH essentially 1.1 gigatons, but then when they're 6-B, they have a 12 teratons difference, and you don't buy it, despite it being an ACTUAL difference. It's pretty flawed man, with all due respect. You're talking about being more consistent/safe, when you had no problem with the previous High 7-A ratings, DESPITE THE FACT, that they're WAYYY more inconsistent, than what WE'RE proposing. I'm just getting the feeling that you're downgrading/lowballing for literally no reason, especially now that I showed you this. So giving the inconsistency reason Damage, would not be fair to say.
Also another thing. @Antvasima (this is meant for damage, I just want you to see this and give me your thoughts) @Damage3245
What's wrong with people like ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals scaling to 6-B like the yonkos? They were LITERALLY just High 7-A, the yonkos were, and so were ace/marco/jozu, and the admirals. They were ALL High 7-A. So please tell me, what's wrong then? If anything whitebeard was CLOSER to the others when he was High 7-A, and here we're proposing 26 teratons against 14. Which is a HUGE difference, compared to what they were once they were High 7-A. It's just a bit weird how CLOSE they were once they were High 7-A, and there's nothing said about it, not to mention that it's huge lowball, specifically from damage. The difference in their 6-B's, is BIGGER than their differences, when they were HIGH 7-A. I just find it unfair how there's nothing wrong when they're closer at High 7-A, but at 6-B it's a huge problem. I also believe we should settle this quickly, because so far there hasn't been an argument to debunk admirals NOT being 6-B, except "it's inconsistent" but NO ONE said this when they were all High 7-A, with commanders, and yonkos, which is beyond unfair. Damage this is directed towards you bro. Your logic is just unfair/flawed with this case, it's very hypocritical, that you don't mind an Almost NONE difference (1.1 gigatons) when admirals/commanders were possibly High 7-A, and yonko were at least High 7-A, which is essentially the same thing, since they're BOTH essentially 1.1 gigatons, but then when they're 6-B, they have a 12 teratons difference, and you don't buy it, despite it being an ACTUAL difference. It's pretty flawed man, with all due respect. You're talking about being more consistent/safe, when you had no problem with the previous High 7-A ratings, DESPITE THE FACT, that they're WAYYY more inconsistent, than what WE'RE proposing. I'm just getting the feeling that you're downgrading/lowballing for literally no reason, especially now that I showed you this. So giving the inconsistency reason Damage, would not be fair to say.
You don't need to apologize. I obviously wasn't going to suggest we bump them down to 7-A.Well, if the 6-C calculation is out of the picture, I suppose that 6-B seems more appropriate than 7-A. My apologies Damage.
Should be fine now I'm assuming?Akainu
Aokiji
Kizaru
Rayleigh
Benn Beckman
Marco
Jozu
Ace
Also, I said pre gura BB would backscale from hurting Ace in weak spots.