- 61,177
- 14,747
So your first day back from being banned ant the first thing you decide to do is ignore how powerscaling works and flat out ignore feats and accuse us of making up scaling just because you dont like them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the profiles shown don't provide the sufficient evidence or logical scaling, you do need to ask what people were thinking in changing profiles without any checking.WeeklyBattles said:So your first day back from being banned ant the first thing you decide to do is ignore how powerscaling works and flat out ignore feats and accuse us of making up scaling just because you dont like them
They don't have sufficient evidence or scaling given that you have provided zero evidence for it and completely skipped the topic before making the changes.WeeklyBattles said:Except they do have sufficient evidence and logical scaling, as evidenced by the threads that hashed out said evidence and scaling and the people who have agreed that said evidence and scaling is sufficient
You ignoring the numerous feats the characters have =/= they have no feats.
I'd love to since the scaling and lack of evidence suggests that most people didn't actually read through and double check anything Weekly posted and so allowed him to make give unsupported ratings and bad scaling.Rocker1189 said:Man, doing this over 2 discussion pages was such fun, lets do it again!
That's a lot of things you're saying up above, but it isn't evidence for any of the champions I've mentioned above. I've asked for it twice now, not sure why you're so keen on ignoring it.WeeklyBattles said:That's awfully presumptuous of you to say Regis
Frankly pretty unsubstantiated as well given the extensive conversations and debates that were had between everyone who worked on setting the scaling straight
Though i guess its to be expected of you to simply handwave the opinions of everyone who agrees with something you choose to not agree with
When there are a lot of problems with the scaling and little evidence to support that scaling, did you or anyone else really think that there wouldn't be problems, especially after how the edits were done? Especially given the changes to characters with zero scaling?Assaltwaffle said:What happened to the nigh-universal subsonic scaling?
How did this restart??
Having gone through all the posts, they both fanned the flames a lot. I think it's pretty unfair for you and Matt to ignore Weekly's part in it.Assaltwaffle said:>So staff members are fine when they act like that?
Pushing it with this. I'm tired of dealing with this garbage attitude and the only reason the ban wasn't permanent was to give you a chance to reform your actions. If you have no intention of changing let's go ahead and skip straight to the point and reinstate that ban.
Post Summary |
Regis: This makes little sense. Weekly: That is how scaling works. Regis: Apparently this WoG statement is something to ignore. Weekly: Your first day back you ignore how power scaling works and accuse us of making up scaling just because you don't like them. Regis: You need to ask what people were thinking in changing profiles without any checking. Weekly: Except they do have evidence, you're ignoring feats. Regis: You have provided zero evidence. Rocker: Sarcastic comment. Regis: Most people didn't double check anything, Weekly have unsupported ratings and bad scaling. Rocker: Sarcasm and "you won't be satisfied". Weekly: That's presumptuous and handwaving, you're just choosing not to agree with it. Regis: You're saying a lot but not giving evidence, really shows off the objective standards applied to the verse. Weekly: You haven't posted evidence, you just don't like the ratings. Regis: You haven't posted evidence, you're attacking me for pointing out mistakes. Weekly: You haven't pointed out any mistakes. Regis: Why do you like being a terrible editor of this wiki. Assalt: How did this restart? Friendly: Regis has a point, these few characters shouldn't scale. Regis: Did you or anyone else really think that there wouldn't be problems? |
It was really stressful to go through these discussions with Weekly, but I think his toxicity in DMs was also driven by his stress over these revisions in general, and was nonexistent in our discussions about other verses.Assaltwaffle said:We have had long discussion with Friendly and Agnaa, both of who had many disagreements. Never did we have to grind to a halt because of the toxicity of a user. You can disagree and debate without making progress impossible because of the never ending insults, condescension, and irrelevant fallacies.
Non-canon material means that she doesn't scale.WeeklyBattles said:Lissandra outpaced quinn, yes she scales
Fodder from nearly every faction have reacted to champs with subsonicfeats yes they scale
So is there a response?RegisNex1232 said:So is there a response to the various points I've raised earlier, from Lissandra not scaling to Quinn to the lack of fodder feats and showings that support nigh universal scaling?
Being pre 2017 and not added on Universe makes it non-canon as per Riot. Unlike people here or on LoL Wiki, they have the final say in deciding what is canon, and Journey into the Freljord does not meet their criteria given out in the link above. What you are suggesting is that we ignore Riot just for this case, despite using Riot WoG in several profiles.WeeklyBattles said:Journey into the freljord is 100% canon, nothing whatsoever is contradictory about it, it being old does not make it non-canon
Ive already shown the feats numerous times in the past two threads
Sorry, I was heading out and read this pretty fast. You have my full apology for improperly representing you.Agnaa said:I had all-caps, italicized, and bolded text of me saying that Weekly's remarks aren't equal. I don't appreciate you making this comment in light of that.