If you simply don’t want to or are simply not interested in reading, then you can say so. Why try to covertly pretend that the thread is very long and massive, and you get tired of reading it. It is obvious that based on these conclusions we can conclude that there is no interest in this thread
If it’s only convenient to think so, then of course. But in reality, even one author may not maintain consistency in his work, let alone multiple authors
It's not simply because "it’s only convenient to think so", but because we've provided real evidence.
Dragon Ball Super canonically a continuation of Zet, but has a lot of contradictions in the plot and inconsistencies with cosmology. So the evidence of canonicity is nothing more than conditional evidence, necessary only to somehow connect certain events.
I have no intention of entertaining such poor complaints. Dragon Ball's contradictions are minor enough to not really affect that much; SCP's 3125 is 5D in a metaphorical sense only.
So insignificant that their cosmology is completely different from the previous one. So insignificant that the character who was previously weaker than Buu suddenly became stronger than all the Z fighters. How insignificant that characters who should have existed in previous seasons were accidentally introduced in the new one and should have been told about them a long time ago. Or should I remind you that the universe could have been destroyed in Zet, but this is something incredible in Super?
Quite a convenient position, just to justify the mistake of an author whose vision of the character is different from other authors
If you're going to continue to complain using complaints with next to no basis, just stop. I will report you if you continue derailing.
Pretend that this thread is massive? Pretend? Blud... this whole OP is 3,500 words long. If printed out in MLA format, that's a 14 page long document! And we wonder why all the admins dip literally 5 seconds after being tagged to these threads.
My brother in Christ, the amount of info genuinely relevant to this CRT isn't large. If striking information is likely to get lost on people, it's your responsibility to present it in a concise manner. No one's disagreeing out of ignorance, but because they've assessed the information differently than you have. This is becoming commonplace. Several times in your response to my breakdown to this CRT, I noticed you left comments that amounted to "why do you act like your interpretation is the correct one," trying to imply that I'm being conceited in my approach (ironically, every time I interpret one of these posts, I go out of my way to provide scans and in-depth explanations as to why I believe my interpretations are reliable). On the contrary, several times in the past weeks, I've written preambles trying to help and explain how you could better format some of your arguments and make them more presentable, only for my suggestions to be lost on deaf ears and for me to be met with spite.
Please, just cease this "if people want clarification, they should go back and read the text better" arrogance. The staff are busy people with jobs and lives. You can't create a CRT, admittedly include loads of information that's not relevant, bury the actual changes amid mountains of texts, then complain that "the staff only sided with me because my counters were better presented." Presentability is integral to persuasion, stop acting like it's anyone else's responsibility to make your CRT persuasive enough and just organize your points better.
Everything is relative. If we resolve one thing while turning a blind eye to the same contradiction in the other, it will not be very good. I have a completely calm conversation without aggression, and ask legitimate questions, so I don’t see the point in such unfounded anger
The problem is that no characters currently scale to this infinite multiverse because the iteration of the multiverse was different in those time periods, as was the cosmology. Darkseid, Barbatos, Perpetua, Mandrakk were all there during the New 52 iteration of the multiverse and then doesn't scale to the infinite multiverse in Dark Crisis: Big Bang
Where did this infinite MULTIVERSE come from?
Dark Crisis: Big Bang.
Literally,I mean the cosmology not those characters…
Cosmologies also apply. I said in another thread that a side note should be made that at the end of Dark Crisis, the Orrery and the Pre-Crisis Multiverse merged, becoming 2-A. This would only upgrade the characters and realms who scale to this new iteration of reality based on context.
I'm currently doing a crt about the combined works of various authors who have all worked together throughout the 21st century to construct the DC cosmology (I.e. Grant Morrison, Scott Snyder, James Tynion IV, and Joshua Williamson with the help of other writers like Geoff Johns)
Actually,the above is what I want to say. Apart from the possibility that Spectre v4 may have infinite layers of dreams, I personally think that in order to upgrade, it is necessary to study “crisis cosmology” and more content in the future…I'm currently doing a crt about the combined works of various authors who have all worked together throughout the 21st century to construct the DC cosmology (I.e. Grant Morrison, Scott Snyder, James Tynion IV, and Joshua Williamson with the help of other writers like Geoff Johns)
Higher tiers for this "crisis cosmology" is still possible.
Anyway, I would greatly appreciate it if we could drop this for now and get back to the topic of this thread please.
More
It would be interesting to look at the evidence that proves that ALL AUTHORS will not contradict themselves. Especially those who write Grappler Bаki
I never said the authors wouldn't contradict themselves, I said the nature of those franchises can canonically account for those contradictions.
You need detail and well-reasoned arguments, which, as far as I can tell based on the response this thread's received, you don't have. It's as simple as that.
You've already asked this question, and I don't know how to satisfactorily answer it for you.
But it still doesn't make sense to me. I mean, I get that multiple authors and writers have taken different approaches on the Overvoid, but if that's the case, shouldn't it be more of a composite of all the different interpretations made from them if it holds all the stories together?
Please open a separate thread for this, we are deviating from the purpose of CRT.
Okay, I will. You open to joining me on it?
My agitation is perfectly founded when you're derailing. We are not "turning a blind eye" to those contradictions, we've resolved them.
It makes sense to me that the wiki divides DC into writers and cosmologies. However, it doesn't seem fair unless you do this for every verse.
This complaint has already been made and has been rejected. Stop derailing.
Jeez, sorry...
I just said that this issue should be discussed under a different thread. He asked for my opinion and I gave my opinion. Since when are opinions questioned? This is my personal opinion, and I have not made it official, you cannot interfere with it. You're constantly making statements that will tense the atmosphere, so don't do that.
