Oh boy... even with Elizio's warning, this will inevitably develop into one of
those threads, huh? We're just falling deeper into the rabbit hole...
If you simply don’t want to or are simply not interested in reading, then you can say so. Why try to covertly pretend that the thread is very long and massive, and you get tired of reading it. It is obvious that based on these conclusions we can conclude that there is no interest in this thread
Pretend that this thread is massive?
Pretend? Blud... this whole OP is 3,500 words long. If printed out in
MLA format, that's a 14 page long document! And we wonder why all the admins dip literally 5 seconds after being tagged to these threads.
Reading it tells you what changes is needed. The way it’s structured is just implemented some tiering change with the information given by the thread. In some aspect it’s the same so feel free to skim through the parts but the whole thread needs to be read.
Not wanting to as I stated is a matter of preference. If you don’t want to then don’t. It’s almost like you guys are trying to say you’re forced into this thread. Simply ignore if you don’t have anything to say about the actual thread which I believe you haven’t fully read.
My brother in Christ, the amount of info genuinely relevant to this CRT isn't large. If striking information is likely to get lost on people, it's your responsibility to present it in a concise manner. No one's disagreeing out of ignorance, but because they've assessed the information differently than you have. This is becoming commonplace. Several times in your response to my breakdown to this CRT, I noticed you left comments that amounted to "why do you act like your interpretation is the correct one," trying to imply that I'm being conceited in my approach (ironically, every time I interpret one of these posts, I go out of my way to provide scans and in-depth explanations as to why I believe my interpretations are reliable). On the contrary, several times in the past weeks, I've written preambles trying to help and explain how you could better format some of your arguments and make them more presentable, only for my suggestions to be lost on deaf ears and for me to be met with spite.
This reached a tipping point on the Vertigo CRT, I noticed. Deagon started calling you out for making your CRT so long, especially when the information diverging from the current cosmology was minimal. You kept acting haughty, ignoring his suggestions, until Ant also found this problematic, and had to reject it on the spot to frighten you into cleaning it up. Seriously... in the previous CRT, you were complaining that my arguments were "so bad" and the staff only sided with my reasoning because it was better formatted and articulated, but I don't take that as an insult. Is it supposed to be everyone else's fault that every time someone says "I'm confused as to what you're proposing," rather than clarifying yourself, you insist that people should figure it out? If you genuinely can't make your arguments presentable unless something drastic happens like
Ant saying on the spot that he'd willingly reject the CRT if it doesn't articulate the changes it seeks to propose (you know,
the bare minimum to expect from a CRT), I don't know what to tell you. Just so we're clear, you
are aware that making a large proposal is not mutually exclusive with making your points presentable, right?
A number of times throughout your recent CRT's, people have asked you in honest-to-god good faith to clarify some basic points, and you responded with spite and relentless dismissal of their concerns.
Please, just cease this "if people want clarification, they should go back and read the text better" arrogance. The staff are busy people with jobs and lives. You can't create a CRT, admittedly include loads of information that's not relevant, bury the actual changes amid mountains of texts, then complain that "the staff only sided with me because my counters were better presented." Presentability is integral to persuasion, stop acting like it's anyone else's responsibility to make your CRT persuasive enough and just organize your points better.
