Both cases should be included as long as they aren't retconned (by deletion or otherwise) or contradicted.
Bruh the two condition that i say is literally contradicted with each other, how can something is both cases
You are not understanding. I'm saying it applies to both, limited events and deleted content, not that they are equal.
The distinction of 1.0 and 2.0 is purely a global release thing. For mainland China it was just a overhaul update like any other update.
So the information deleted it's still recognized in some way? Cuz otherwise, you might have a problem.
Yes one of the bosses that was stated to bypass time by his movement still does it in game so they do reference those with visuals which I think is a fair game.
Yeah I'm okay with that. Just kinda puzzled what statement would make everything valid but we will see about it, but yes if there are things alluding to those then they would be good. My point is stuff that existed but now nothing points to them shouldn't be taken into account.
Also please bring proof of all that. I would consider it good for the DMC supporters as they can dump all stuff here to have them in future crt.
That would lend credence, indeed.
That's not a tall order at all. Literally, "this story is continued" or "a character that appeared there it's here", to give the most basic of examples.
You mean we still can use the content (not limited events) that already being deleted as far as that content not contradict with the canon?
And is referenced in some way from what I got, not just not contradicted.
But it being deleted. Why even we use that?
...because it's referenced. Thus, it still exists in-verse.
We'll provide it then. Just wait for Sevil to come online.
Reference just for if it exist, if it not then just why??? No if it already being deleted it not exist anymore in verse unless it limited time event or in previous version of the verse
Like, literally scan for every single thing? Now that's a tall order. I would disagree with that out the simple fact: No fiction will ever truly do that. But likely other staff members would disagree with me here.
I guess put me on neutral until then.
Umm if it's referenced it still exists. Like if before there was a battle with Dark Lord wtf and the game changes but there is still a Dark Lord WTF and the game portrays him in basically the same way then the information from the past can be used.
Eventually scans will refer to multiple stuff which would make many things canon again. My problem is taking some stuff as canon and other stuff that are not referenced anywhere themselves basically gaining free entry because if some stuff are canon then it would be (to my mind logically faulty) natural to make nearly everything canon. Basically take the most conservative approach in this topic where only stuff with proof become canon again. But we can see how other people feel about this. Would you be of the opinion that this issue should be tackled in a staff discussion thread to have a precedent and a stable guideline for it?
I literally brought you an example of things literally deleted. Like, the Living RPG is gone, dead. It is not maintained, nor upholded, nor anything of the sort by WotC (and in fact, information of it isn't supposed to be readily distributed, from what I've heard in certain d&d forums).
Then that content which has been referenced is valid to use. The other content that hasn't been referenced can't be valid to use because for all intents and purposes it doesn't exist except in some webby SSD.
Yeah then just a content of "battle with dark lord" that we cannot use, because just it that being deleted. I talking about something that literally being deleted, why we use that?
Then those characters are fine. Ideally they would have the same story. Is the game nearly out?
That’s asking for too much, there is no reason for the devs to reference everything since they will be under the impression that the content is still valid by referencing parts of it.
It's not that complicated of an issue to warrant a staff discussion. We simply won't use "General WTH". GGs.
Nevan was shown in a cutscene, same as before, and Pluto was still fighting with his spear like before. It said it was coming soon, but no date was given.
How is the content valid if it's being deleted? It's not limited event stuff, if it was then even a small reference unlocks a lot of content. If it was main story stuff though then the approach is much more conservative because those were all basic stuff that are now deleted.
But what if Dark Lord Wtf has fought the General, but this is not shown anywhere? Do we only make the stuff canon that have no relation to Wth? Basically how much does one character make canon everything connected to it without that other stuff being referenced in some way, except existing in the old version to the character's story.
I wouldn't disagree. And yeah, asking a scan for literally every single thing is just borderline insanity.
That's the point. In this example, "General WTH" literally is not mentioned to ever exist anymore. That's a valid retconned case.
Holmes’s creation.
Yeah, that's my belief as well.
I'm proud of him.
Yeah if an event he participated in especially if he spearheaded is referenced he can be considered canon except if something was changed enough to exclude his involvement. Also if something Dark Lord Wtf does points to Wth then he can also be considered valid like some move that we know Wth did in the past.
