2A (Possibly L1C) Devil May Cry - A relevant closer to a CRT

[Deagonx]

I'm referring to the space that contains them... Regardless I'm about to make a thread about that topic now.

Yes, but the space that contains them simply being "infinite" isn't 2-A. It would need to either contain an infinite amount of universes or there would need to be a direct indication that it could contain an infinite amount. There isn't any and the OP isn't even alleging that there is, aside from using Low 1-C arguments.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

That would make it Low 1-C.

You'd still need uncountable infinite or evidence of dimensional superiority to get that, no?

 

[LordGriffin1000]

Yes, but the space that contains them simply being "infinite" isn't 2-A. It would need to either contain an infinite amount of universes or there would need to be a direct indication that it could contain an infinite amount. There isn't any and the OP isn't even alleging that there is, aside from using Low 1-C arguments.

Which is why I'm made this thread, because apparently people are getting 2-A using that logic

 

[CloverDragon03]

That would make it Low 1-C.

Then I'm a little lost admittedly, because I then can't really see where 2-A is coming from

 

[Deagonx]

Then I'm a little lost admittedly, because I then can't really see where 2-A is coming from

It isn't coming from anywhere. He is arguing that it doesn't contain infinite universes, but it could, and his justification for that is simply a previously rejected argument for Low 1-C:

Is there any direct evidence that the number of realms is itself infinite? If not, how would it be 2-A?

I'm focusing on the structure and capacity of the Demon World rather than the actual count of realms within it.

I don't see how any of those things demonstrate that the DW is capable of containing infinite universes within it.

The "Demon World" is depicted to be "infinite" as a "container", a structure, in relative to a 4th dimensional construct being treated as insignificant in comparison to it. This is clearly a hint towards it's 2A (Multiverse+) capacity at the very least.

That's why I'm saying the proposal is a bit farcical. We can't rationally pass a 2-A upgrade where the OP is freely admitting that there is no evidence for 2-A whatsoever, and that his rationale for 2-A is textbook Low 1-C.

 

[SuperSonicTL]

It isn't coming from anywhere. He is arguing that it doesn't contain infinite universes, but it could, and his justification for that is simply a previously rejected argument for Low 1-C:

Soo what you suggest here?

That's why I'm saying the proposal is a bit farcical. We can't rationally pass a 2-A upgrade where the OP is freely admitting that there is no evidence for 2-A whatsoever, and that his rationale for 2-A is textbook Low 1-C.

Given the context, I'd obviously assume it would rationalize both those tiers simultaneously whatsoever. Am I wrong?

It in itself is infinite and sees an L2C structure as finite line.

 

[Deagonx]

Given the context, I'd obviously assume it would rationalize both those tiers simultaneously whatsoever. Am I wrong?

Yes, you are wrong.

It is true that a Low 1-C structure could contain an infinite amount of 4-D universes, but it's not logical to say that this makes anything 2-A. It'd be like saying a character is star level because they are galaxy level, because galaxies contain lots of stars. It's automatic that a high tier encompasses the lower tiers.

It in itself is infinite and sees an L2C structure as finite line.

This is an argument for Low 1-C, and notably, it is an argument that has been rejected before.

That doesn't mean that you can't propose it again, but it isn't an argument for 2-A and you would need to make it clear that you want to re-argue the "ray of light" scan as a justification for Low 1-C.

 

[SuperSonicTL]

Yes, you are wrong.

It is true that a Low 1-C structure could contain an infinite amount of 4-D universes, but it's not logical to say that this makes anything 2-A. It'd be like saying a character is star level because they are galaxy level, because galaxies contain lots of stars. It's automatic that a high tier encompasses the lower tiers.

I actually agree with this except the context here is slightly different then one could assume under normal occasions.

This is an argument for Low 1-C, and notably, it is an argument that has been rejected before.

That doesn't mean that you can't propose it again, but it isn't an argument for 2-A and you would need to make it clear that you want to re-argue the "ray of light" scan as a justification for Low 1-C.

Ultima recently basically said it could mean L1C too and also pointed he didn't read the blog. He just pointed it out on normal occasion instead of looking deep into the context.

 

[Ryu-Strongest-Fighter-in-Universe]

Im Agree
You can count me for being agree on dmc upgrading to 2-A and low 1-C

 

[Tarikari]

Is this still active?

 

[Huesito88]

Is this still active?

Yes

 

[SuperSonicTL]

Is this still active?

I've some things to discuss here before I conclude it but after my exams are over.

In truth, the situation is much more different then just any space that contains space-time continuums within it, mainly according to certain implications for higher dimensional framework due to an interesting comparison that focuses on both quality and quantity of the outer and inner realms soo I need to go through it carefully how to interpret it as and if the wiki actually allows it or not.

 

[Firestorm808]

At least 2-B, likely 2-A

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Still disagree with that

 

[Ryu-Strongest-Fighter-in-Universe]

But im agree with both 2-A and low 1-C
I have my reasons

 

[SuperSonicTL]

Anyway just to be sure, we should probably refrain from talking here, atleast till this revision thread is finished.