- 2,103
- 300
you talking about the G1 blogs calc for it? or? Just asking cause I can link it if that is what your talking about
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dante's Immeasurable justifications
- Thread starter Ningenron
- Start date
- 2,406
- 1,320
No, it was an old VSBW blog.
- 13,084
- 2,761
Alright then post it
Im completely disagree. Please count me as a disagree vote
- 2,406
- 1,320
Hey everyone. So sorry for the delay, I've had real life commitments.
Here is the old calculation blog for Mundus expanding his space.
The arguments about it being a universe or not are because at the time it was solely based on what Kamiya had said without all the additional proof. And the promised "proof" that it wasn't a universe consisted of examples of Kamiya trolling on Twitter. We're only looking at the speed measurements here.
Here is the old calculation blog for Mundus expanding his space.
The arguments about it being a universe or not are because at the time it was solely based on what Kamiya had said without all the additional proof. And the promised "proof" that it wasn't a universe consisted of examples of Kamiya trolling on Twitter. We're only looking at the speed measurements here.
- 13,084
- 2,761
So the Billion value?
- 2,406
- 1,320
The billion value is for the stars we see and the standard night sky. The quadrillion value is for the observable universe. Given that it is described as a universe, the observable universe measurement is probably reasonable too.
- 511
- 467
Huh? Didn't knew someone already did the calc over the expension part.
- 2,406
- 1,320
Ages ago. Buried during the dark times...
- 511
- 467
Dead chat ahh environment
- 2,406
- 1,320
Here is the old calculation blog for Mundus expanding his space.
Basically the time is 2.2 seconds, so the distance is the key to the different measurements.
The different measurements that are relevant here are:
234 billion C for the most distant visible star in the real-life night sky
667 quadrillion C for the observable universe
We know that it is a universe, so the observable universe is more of a bare minimum here.
It is referred to as infinitely expanding and a universe, so infinite is a valid suggestion here, but let's start with these numbers instead of focusing on that.
Basically the time is 2.2 seconds, so the distance is the key to the different measurements.
The different measurements that are relevant here are:
234 billion C for the most distant visible star in the real-life night sky
667 quadrillion C for the observable universe
We know that it is a universe, so the observable universe is more of a bare minimum here.
It is referred to as infinitely expanding and a universe, so infinite is a valid suggestion here, but let's start with these numbers instead of focusing on that.
Last edited:
BitestDust
He/Him- 74
- 27
Wow, the discussions are still going strong here. Have you come to any conclusions?
- 13,084
- 2,761
We need staff
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,725
- 14,124
- 2,406
- 1,320
Repost:
Here is the old calculation blog for Mundus expanding his space.
Basically the time is 2.2 seconds, so the distance is the key to the different measurements.
The different measurements that are relevant here are:
234 billion C for the most distant visible star in the real-life night sky
667 quadrillion C for the observable universe
We know that it is a universe, so the observable universe is more of a minimum here.
Here is the old calculation blog for Mundus expanding his space.
Basically the time is 2.2 seconds, so the distance is the key to the different measurements.
The different measurements that are relevant here are:
234 billion C for the most distant visible star in the real-life night sky
667 quadrillion C for the observable universe
We know that it is a universe, so the observable universe is more of a minimum here.
Palito266
He/Him- 261
- 156
I think the 234 Billion C result seems more likely. We know that it's expanding because of this statement right here, so the diameter of the Mundus Universe may not be the same diameter as our universe (since ours has been expanding for far longer). Assuming the most distant visible star should be fine since we don't know exactly the speed of expansion, and neither we know the diameter as I've said. And also stars can be visible in the cutscenes.
Last edited:
- 5,292
- 3,426
On the question of a new mftl+ or infinite classification, wouldn't a new crt be better? This one looks kind dead. Unless there are just a few votes missing for some side.
- 13,084
- 2,761
I think a new crt would be better (I already tried calling some staff again regarding the potential MFTL+ replacement and they still didn't respond)
- 1,379
- 958
Either way, what is the current conclusion?
- 13,084
- 2,761
The removal has enough votes to proceed just people arguing and now are proposing something for a replacement MFTL+ feat for the current speed rating
- 511
- 467
For this one, we need to get a solid quantifiable speed rating for the verse. This infinite to immeasurable stuff can be handled later.
Soo the most likely preferable approach is to create another CRT that focuses on finite speed after applying this immeadiately. It's already pretty cluttered from the debunk shenanigans in terms of vote and frankly no one cares at this point.
The real question is who would make it?
Soo the most likely preferable approach is to create another CRT that focuses on finite speed after applying this immeadiately. It's already pretty cluttered from the debunk shenanigans in terms of vote and frankly no one cares at this point.
The real question is who would make it?
- 1,379
- 958
Alright, So the infinite and immeasurable speed has been debunked, WHile the finite speed replacement takes place in another CRT?
If so will it be replaced with the previous speed or temporary use "unknown"?
- 511
- 467
Label it unknown for now imo. The speed of the verse is all over the place after this.
- 13,084
- 2,761
Unknown looks good for now. Will you make the new MFTL+ thread or will someone else?
- 511
- 467
I'll deal with immeasurable & infinite stuff as I got some interesting cases on my research I wanna keep in secret for now.
Someone of you should make finite speed CRT imo.
I still didn't convince with the debunks.
We can argue about it, probably when i had its time
We can argue about it, probably when i had its time
