• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
AKM sama

AKM sama

VS Battles Bureaucrat Administrator Human Resources
Waifu Connoisseur
Joined
Last seen
Messages
11,135
Reaction score
14,120

Profile posts Postings About

  • Recently completed 7 years on this wiki! Damn! That's long. I feel old.
    Armorchompy
    Hi, certain real life profiles haven't had their matches section to reflect the forum move. I'm not sure why that is, but Ant told me to contact you about it.
    Arcker123
    Hello, could you kindly review this thread. It is incredibly close to being finished and your input would be greatly appreciated
    BarkB0rk123
    hi i'm a supporter of the hclw verse and recently there is a feat performed that could raise some characters tiers, to whom should i ask to calculate the feat?
    Barkburkb0rk
    i have some problems with my account, my main account is BarkB0rk123 but i can't login here with it.
    And with this accoun't i can't log in into the old vsbattles wiki.
    wat can i do that i can use my main account BarkB0rk123?
    I have tried multiple times to login here but can't...
    Firephoenixearl
    Hoi, AKM could i ask you to check this for a bit as a HR member:


    In that CRT, there are a lot of points left to discuss. 1 of them being "Dante tanks a particle beam". This however only happens in gameplay if the player doesn't dodge the particle beam as in cutscenes (the primary canon of the game) he chooses to put barriers in front of him to block the same attack instead of just getting hit. My issues are:

    1. "Gameplay for any game is always canon" isn't a standard currently however ppl are saying that since other games treat gameplay as canon i have to make a CRT to debunk it all at once (which i personally do not get, as each game has its own circumstances regarding gameplay and should be discussed on a case by case). Do you think i have to make this CRT to include all of them or can this be discussed case by case?

    2. That was only 1 of the things that was being discussed. Because @Theglassman12 did not like that 1 point, he completely closed the thread despite me and other people (glass included) having been discussing other points of the CRT that have no relation to the gameplay thing. Could you check this behavior as closing a CRT cus a staff member doesn't like 1 of the 10 points being discussed doesn't seem like a good reason and feels to me like power abuse.
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    Hey AKM. Mr. Bambu commented on my calc. He said timeframe is iffy but math's alright. Does this count as being accepted?
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    If the timeframe is iffy, you need to create a CRT discussing what could be a better timeframe. If it goes well, then you can apply it.
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    So, I should make a CRT with this feat, asking people if the timeframe works?
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    Yes, and if this feat is fine to apply.
    Dangai_Ichigo
    Uhm, hey how can I change my username?
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    You'll have to change your fandom username for it, and you can only do it once. I'd personally advise against it.
    Warren_Valion
    Hey, could you aid in the endeavor that is this CRT?

    It is a lot of content to review, admittedly, but I put hundreds of hours into it and would appreciate it if you could give it a once over.

    Thank you
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    You weren't kidding when you said that's a lot of stuff to review. You can try pinging other mods and knowledgeable members on the thread itself and I will try to take a look when I get enough free time. I am caught up between several other things atm.
    Warren_Valion
    Warren_Valion
    Yeah. I've been working on this for months, it's my magnum opus.

    I've already contacted numerous other mods, but thanks though.

    And thank you.
    Arc7Kuroi
    You mind re-opening the thread you closed for no reason. Or giving me some sort of explanation... Or am I supposed to blindly accept a staff action that silences open discussion on a public form site?
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    People already gave reasons on the thread and on the RVRT. It is not the first time this was brought up even if you changed the OP later. And tier 2 Naruto isn't happening here. You can go to other open public forum sites if you want to have that discussion.
    Arc7Kuroi
    Arc7Kuroi
    You know there was a discussion rule saying tier 2 Bleach wasn’t happening either, but here I came.

    AFAIK the only banned Naruto discussion is Kaguya’s ETSO. So, so what it’s been discussed before, I haven’t been here before.

    Regarding the compositing, link me the rules so I can ensure it isn’t compositing, but I fixed it to not be compositing. So I fail to see why your “yeah no” justifies closing it.
    ZoroNotZolo
    Yo, could I change my username from "MaverickIsTheHype" to "ZoroNotZolo"? I changed my name in Fandom and wanted to change my name here to match that.
    The_Narrator_of_Narrative
    Hey AKM, I hope I’m not bothering you, but I was recommended to change my username to the one I had previously in the Wiki, I was previously “The_Narrator_of_Narratives” so I was wondering if you couldn’t help me with this =)
    Everything12
    In this Thread, Ant was talking about improving the Immeasurable speed rating to minimise the amount of wrongly given out ratings and CRTs created based off wrong assumptions. I suggest this based on Dragon's post and Ant said I should take it to you.
    SmartSelect_20201129-190909_Brave.jpg
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    It seems there was a misunderstanding. I wasn't planning to revise/remove immeasurable speed. It's a WIP but my concern was only for characters who are a certain speed normally, but get an extra immeasurable rating just because they travel through time.
    ProfessorKukui4Life
    Hey AKM. I saw your recent response in the starry sky thread, but I have an issue with it. I’m messaging you here about it so the thread stays staff only and I don’t have much else right now to add in.

    AKM sama said:
    I agree with this. Not every starry visual effect should automatically be considered as real stars just because "if it looks like a duck it must be a duck". A blatant example of this would be Toppo using the destruction energy that gave the world of void a clear starry sky effect, but it was basically just a void. Any such feat should be scrutinized according to the above points.
    Click to expand...
    The only thing from Matts argument I don’t agree with is not taking every starry feat first as automatically real stars. In order for us to deny the legitimacy of the stars, we need to first be given a reason to think they aren’t real stars. Otherwise, we take a leap in logic that unnecessarily goes against the Occams Razor. Outer space, black background, white dots come. What’s the first impressions we reasonably get? That they are stars. Something else needs to come up to suggest aren’t real stars.

    The Toppo example isn’t a real fair comparison to this since, in his case, things do come up and suggest his feat doesn’t produce real stars. You yourself admit this:

    Reason: It’s in a void. A void isn’t a normal universe, dimension or reality, which clearly means the Wov doesn’t have an outer space environment that normally houses real stars. And we know there’s no literal outer space since everyone not named Zen’o, the GoDs or Angels wouldn't have survived in the tournament without air.

    Since it happened in a void, the feat automatically axed itself as being real stars, which of course means we won’t accept it. The example in itself isn’t wrong at all.

    I just don’t agree that we need a reason to consider the stars real first. What should be first is a reason to not consider them real.
    • Like
    Reactions: KLOL506 and 00potato
    View previous comments…
    ProfessorKukui4Life
    ProfessorKukui4Life
    "What is that explanation? We have been given zero explanation."

    I gave this explanation in my original message:

    "Reason: It’s in a void. A void isn’t a normal universe, dimension or reality, which clearly means the Wov doesn’t have an outer space environment that normally houses real stars. And we know there’s no literal outer space since everyone not named Zen’o, the GoDs or Angels wouldn't have survived in the tournament without air."

    And in in the reply section:

    "Basically, my point is this:

    Character A creates reality -> Reality displays starry background -> Nothing in the scene says its fake -> We take it as real by default

    Character B creates reality -> Reality displays starry background -> The scene suggests its fake because conflicting evidence is present within the feat itself -> We reject the feat

    In Toppos case, he is Character B."
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    Reason: It’s in a void. A void isn’t a normal universe, dimension or reality, which clearly means the Wov doesn’t have an outer space environment that normally houses real stars. And we know there’s no literal outer space since everyone not named Zen’o, the GoDs or Angels wouldn't have survived in the tournament without air.
    Click to expand...
    You see, we don't know that. All we know is that there is air surrounding the ring and in the general area. GP is a reality warper and it is completely okay for him to make something like this possible when he can make it so that everybody feels their home planet's gravity and nobody could fly. So the idea that GP filled the entire void with air and there is no outer space environment far far away doesn't hold up.
    ProfessorKukui4Life
    ProfessorKukui4Life
    The air point I can see what your saying and agree with being possible, but not the outer space one. The World of Void isn't initially a universe or reality in the first place but just a blank voided area, we even see this when they first enter it for the tournament.
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    I think they had registered previously with the same name as Yuruginai so I could approve that account instead. They can contact me on my wall if they want to have their email address changed too.
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    Da_Lunge_Fish
    The problem is, he already deleted his old account.
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    I can still make it so he can use his Yuruginai account. Just tell him to contact me on the wiki message wall and I'll talk to him directly regarding it.
    SSJRyu1
    Hey. So about calcing the Roshi moon feat. Kep actually did this calculation a while back for me when I asked him to. I get the same results btw when I do it out.
    vsbattles.fandom.com

    Kepekley23

    vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

    So if your looking for a calc instead of just moon level here is one. The timeframe he thought was reasonable for dispersal, not even factoring in reaching the moon was 20 seconds for the 2 pages, which I think is conservative given it was in the heat of battle against Oozaru.

    You may want to do a calc thread separately after using the feat is concluded, or include this in the current discussion, I am not sure.
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    While I think 20-30 seconds is a reasonable low-end timeframe for this, but the main point of contention was whether to assume the moon got exploded or simply vaporized. This probably needs to be discussed as its own topic, yes.
    SSJRyu1
    SSJRyu1
    Fair enough. Yeah I could see how that could be up for debate. I think if the calc were done separately that could be good, just apply the feat itself and then think about speed and a more specific output after. BTW I can think of a few relevant points to bring up when deciding that so id like to be part of the discussion when deciding to use either vaporization or dispersal and the speed of the blast.
    AKM sama
    AKM sama
    Sure. You are welcome to contribute.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top