This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I agree with calling it Notable Matchups.
Let me know if there are any issues with AWB. Anyway, I think this change should not be very difficult to handle.
I am deeply saddened to get this news. I always knew a day will come when the great man will pass away but I never thought it will be so sudden, so soon, and that it will hurt this much. This man has touched the lives of so many people around the world, it's crazy. If you are here and reading...
Hi everybody!
On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrator: @Dereck03
Thread Moderator: @AbaddonTheDisappointment
Calc Group Members: @Chariot190 and @SunDaGamer
These are well...
Hi everybody!
On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrators: @DarkGrath
Content Moderators: @Catzlaflame, @ImmortalDread and @GarrixianXD
Thread Moderator: @Propellus
Calc Group...
I think everybody is on the same page regarding the wiki policies.
And I agree that things like veto shouldn't be a thing in verse-specific CRTs.
Verse-specific discussion rules like the ones listed here should be decided by the agreement of staff and community...
Hi everybody! How's it going?
It's THAT time again. On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrators: @Agnaa and @Just_a_Random_Butler
Content Moderators: @Therefir and...
Content Moderators are well-versed with site standards as they specialize in a very important aspect of the site, i.e. the pages. It's not a simple job. It's justified that they get a say in site-standards. Thread evaluation is just one pillar of the site, while page maintenance is equally...
I think General Discussions already works for this. You can create threads there regarding such discussions. It is not really needed. But if majority of the people want it, it doesn't do any harm either.
We lowball by default unless sufficient evidence/backing is present to go any higher. Especially in these cases we need to be more strict. Agnaa has answered this above satisfactorily. We shouldn't make higher assumptions/interpretations than the minimum viable one.
I am in agreement with DT here. I have always been on the side of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". For such a high tier, I don't think simple statements are sufficient. The context should be provided in detail for us to ascertain if it exactly matches our requirements. Not...
The draft looks okay to me. One point that can be added there is that in case of works that have already been officially translated, we don't claim that the TH team is more skilled than the official translators but there might be some errors that the TH team can help clarify given enough...
Guys, as Celestial Pegasus said, our off-site rules are pretty clear on this:
Off-site behavior is usually irrelevant except in cases of:
Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was...
Hi everybody!
I hope everyone is doing fine in life! On behalf of all the bureaucrats, I bring you another batch of staff promotions after getting input from most of our current staff members.
Administrators: @Crabwhale
Content Moderators: @Marvel_Champion_07
Thread Moderator...
Anyway, that's going on a different tangent. This thread is not about staff position requirements or making a change to it. The thread was about whether we can speed up the CRTs by letting normal users evaluate threads. I think many staff members have already rejected the idea so it should...
It's not a new system. It has been like this for years. Content mods are chosen because they are good with maintaining standards on pages. What we look for while selecting a candidate for, say, content mod position, are these requirements. None of these requirements include the part where they...
The current system might not be perfect, nothing is. Sure it can cause delay and there might be problems here and there but it is currently the best option we have. The suggested approach may speed things up a bit but also sacrifice a level of reliability in the process.
Many times what some...